总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D
节点 n15
Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。
| 运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。 | 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D |
|---|---|
| 父节点 | (种子,没有父节点) |
| 子节点 | n19 |
| 操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。 | 草稿 |
| 状态 | 已打分 |
| 分数 | 搜索目标分 49.05 · X3 49.05 |
| 审查 | 未审查 |
| 用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。 | 27 分 |
| 程序版本 | c05a67757a314a2778d35aff4b369148d6ad245d (programs.git) |
方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。
来自 programs.git c05a67757a:solution/METHOD.md
Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。
METHOD
方法族与机制(family: generative_latent,按 PLAN)
- HVG 2000(各输入阶段都覆盖的基因,按合并方差选);标准化后进 VAE:enc 2000(+2 阶段 one-hot)→256→64→z(20),dec 20→64→256→2000,Gaussian 似然,KL 权重 0.005(PLAN 的 0.1 使潜空间塌缩,||dz||≈0.001,机制失效;实测降到 0.005 后 ||dz||≈0.41),Adam 1e-3,batch 256,100 epochs,CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。
- 转移:Z(E8.75 类) 与 Z(E9.0 类) 之间 POT
ot.sinkhorn(reg=0.1,代价按中位数归一,每阶段 ≤3000 细胞);δ_i = 重心映射 − z0_i;对每个末阶段细胞取 k=15 个最近源细胞,softmax(−d²/h)(h=中位 k 距)加权平均 δ 得 dz_j。z_pred = z_last + scale·dz,scale 默认常数 1.0(auto 模式=时间差之比 clip[0,2],X3 上为 2.0,实测略差)。 - 解码后处理(PLAN 步骤 7 的修改,实测必要):直接把解码值写回会摧毁表达纹理(cell_state 8.9、covariation 8.4,总 28.0,远低于 copy_last)。改为 (a) 每个 HVG 基因把解码值的秩映射到末阶段该基因的经验分位数(恢复稀疏与边缘分布),(b) 与末阶段真实值按 γ=0.5 线性混合(纯解码 γ=1 时 covariation 48 但 cell_state 35;混合把 cell_state 拉到 68,代价是 covariation 降到 28.6)。clamp ≥0。
- 单输入退路:无转移,输出=该阶段 encode-decode(自编码对照),符合 PLAN 步骤 8。
- 视图无关:只用时间差与数据;seed 确定(np.random.default_rng(seed)、torch.manual_seed(seed),纯 CPU)。
机制生效证据
[mech]日志:||dz|| mean=0.4097,within-population CV=0.337 > 0.3(PLAN 证据标准 1):位移确实随细胞潜位置变化,不是每型常数。- 机制开/关对照(同一程序
--transition-scale 0vs 默认,X3 A 半,seed 0):- 关(scale=0,纯解码无 QM 时):28.0;关+QM+γ1 未单测;
- 开:scale=1, γ=1, QM:42.98;scale=2, γ=1, QM:42.02;scale=1, γ=0.5, QM(默认):48.92。
- scale=0 与 scale>0 输出不同(dz≠0),机制在跑;转移主要改变 covariation/de_recovery 方向(de_recovery 44.9→41.7,direction 49.8→49.1),而 QM+γ 混合主要修复 cell_state。
- 输出零值率/库大小:nnz/cell 2273 vs 输入 1974(混合使部分零被填),在格式检查内合规。
验证与未验证
- 已验证:X3 视图(E8.75+E9.0→E9.5)vec-check 通过,5 次 vec-score(28.0 / 42.0 / 43.0 / 48.9 / 48.9-默认复现同哈希)。默认输出与打分过的 g05 配置逐位相同。
- 未验证:final(E8.5+E9.5→E10.5)与 proxy 视图未跑分(本节点只挂 X3 尺子);代码路径对单输入(proxy)有退路、对大细胞数有 cap(train 10k/阶段、OT 3k/阶段、kNN 分块),但耗时只在 X3(~3.5k 细胞,1–1.5 min)实测。γ、kl、scale 只做了粗网格,B 半与多 seed 未测。
- 生物学知识来源:未使用禁窗(9.5<E≤13.5)或保留阶段的任何测量信息;方法只依赖视图内输入阶段数据与通用 ML 组件,无外部先验写入。
下一步
γ=0.5 的线性混合牺牲了 covariation(48→28.6);更优方向是用潜位移做"真实细胞选择/组成调制"(对 z_pred 取最近真实末阶段细胞)而非数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把解码 dz 投回基因空间做保稀疏位移(与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合)。
调研员的计划
| 名称 | Gaussian VAE latent transition for E9.5→E10.5 prediction |
|---|---|
| 动机 | Draft of generative_latent family. Current best (node 10, rank3=60.07) uses displacement-based methods; covariation (44.24) and direction (51.05) remain weak. A VAE decoder could produce correlated gene expression changes that displacement methods miss. Node 6 (ot_cfm draft) failed, so this is the second generative attempt. No prior generative_latent node exists in the tree. |
| 做法 | 1) HVG selection: top 2000 genes by variance across all input cells (both stages). 2) Gaussian VAE (data is log1p(CP10k), no counts): encoder 2000→256→64→z_dim(20), decoder 20→64→256→2000, Gaussian likelihood, KL weight 0.1, Adam lr=1e-3, batch=256, 150 epochs (~3 min on GPU). Stage covariate concatenated to encoder input (one-hot). 3) Encode all cells to latent z. 4) State-dependent transition: for each cell type present in both stages, compute per-cell displacement in latent space using kNN-weighted local regression: for E9.5 cell j, find k=15 nearest E9.5 neighbors; for each neighbor i, find its nearest E8.5 partner via OT (POT sinkhorn, reg=0.1, top 2000 HVG, ≤2000 cells/type); displacement δ_i = z(E9.5 partner) − z(E8.5 partner); dz_j = weighted mean of δ_i with softmax(−dist) weights. This makes dz depend on local latent position, not just type mean. 5) Prediction: z_pred = z_E9.5 + scale·dz, where scale = (target_interval/input_interval) clipped to [0,2], default 1.0. 6) Decode z_pred → predicted HVG expression. 7) Output: predicted HVGs replace originals; non-HVG genes keep E9.5 values (preserve sparsity). Apply max(0, ·) clamp. 8) Single-stage fallback: if only one input … |
| 风险 | 1) Decoder reconstruction worse than copy_last (VAE smoothing): Engineer must check zero-transition control first; if it drops >2 points below copy_last, increase hidden dims or reduce latent dim to 10. 2) kNN-OT displacement collapses to per-type constant if within-type variance is small: check std of ||dz|| within each type; if CV < 0.1, mechanism is effectively constant shift. 3) Training time: 150 epochs on ~4000 cells × 2000 genes should be <3 min GPU; set hard 5-min timeout. 4) Dense HVG output destroys sparsity pattern: mitigated by only replacing HVG genes. 5) With only 2 snapshots, transition direction is weakly identified (k030); keep scale conservative. 6) POT sinkhorn may be slow for large types: cap at 2000 cells/type. |
代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。
对比:这个提交的上一版(种子程序:相对空仓库)。改动的文件:solution/EXECUTION.json +1 −0、solution/METHOD.md +30 −0、solution/run.py +299 −0
diff --git a/solution/EXECUTION.json b/solution/EXECUTION.jsonnew file mode 100644index 0000000..9d5125c--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/EXECUTION.json@@ -0,0 +1 @@+{"gpu": false}diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..7a5a1c5--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@+Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。+# METHOD+++## 方法族与机制(family: generative_latent,按 PLAN)++- HVG 2000(各输入阶段都覆盖的基因,按合并方差选);标准化后进 VAE:enc 2000(+2 阶段 one-hot)→256→64→z(20),dec 20→64→256→2000,Gaussian 似然,KL 权重 **0.005**(PLAN 的 0.1 使潜空间塌缩,||dz||≈0.001,机制失效;实测降到 0.005 后 ||dz||≈0.41),Adam 1e-3,batch 256,100 epochs,CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。+- 转移:Z(E8.75 类) 与 Z(E9.0 类) 之间 POT `ot.sinkhorn`(reg=0.1,代价按中位数归一,每阶段 ≤3000 细胞);δ_i = 重心映射 − z0_i;对每个末阶段细胞取 k=15 个最近源细胞,softmax(−d²/h)(h=中位 k 距)加权平均 δ 得 dz_j。z_pred = z_last + scale·dz,scale 默认常数 1.0(auto 模式=时间差之比 clip[0,2],X3 上为 2.0,实测略差)。+- 解码后处理(PLAN 步骤 7 的修改,实测必要):直接把解码值写回会摧毁表达纹理(cell_state 8.9、covariation 8.4,总 28.0,远低于 copy_last)。改为 (a) 每个 HVG 基因把解码值的秩映射到末阶段该基因的经验分位数(恢复稀疏与边缘分布),(b) 与末阶段真实值按 γ=0.5 线性混合(纯解码 γ=1 时 covariation 48 但 cell_state 35;混合把 cell_state 拉到 68,代价是 covariation 降到 28.6)。clamp ≥0。+- 单输入退路:无转移,输出=该阶段 encode-decode(自编码对照),符合 PLAN 步骤 8。+- 视图无关:只用时间差与数据;seed 确定(np.random.default_rng(seed)、torch.manual_seed(seed),纯 CPU)。++## 机制生效证据++- `[mech]` 日志:||dz|| mean=0.4097,**within-population CV=0.337 > 0.3**(PLAN 证据标准 1):位移确实随细胞潜位置变化,不是每型常数。+- 机制开/关对照(同一程序 `--transition-scale 0` vs 默认,X3 A 半,seed 0):+ - 关(scale=0,纯解码无 QM 时):28.0;关+QM+γ1 未单测;+ - 开:scale=1, γ=1, QM:42.98;scale=2, γ=1, QM:42.02;**scale=1, γ=0.5, QM(默认):48.92**。+ - scale=0 与 scale>0 输出不同(dz≠0),机制在跑;转移主要改变 covariation/de_recovery 方向(de_recovery 44.9→41.7,direction 49.8→49.1),而 QM+γ 混合主要修复 cell_state。+- 输出零值率/库大小:nnz/cell 2273 vs 输入 1974(混合使部分零被填),在格式检查内合规。++## 验证与未验证++- 已验证:X3 视图(E8.75+E9.0→E9.5)vec-check 通过,5 次 vec-score(28.0 / 42.0 / 43.0 / 48.9 / 48.9-默认复现同哈希)。默认输出与打分过的 g05 配置逐位相同。+- 未验证:final(E8.5+E9.5→E10.5)与 proxy 视图未跑分(本节点只挂 X3 尺子);代码路径对单输入(proxy)有退路、对大细胞数有 cap(train 10k/阶段、OT 3k/阶段、kNN 分块),但耗时只在 X3(~3.5k 细胞,1–1.5 min)实测。γ、kl、scale 只做了粗网格,B 半与多 seed 未测。+- 生物学知识来源:未使用禁窗(9.5<E≤13.5)或保留阶段的任何测量信息;方法只依赖视图内输入阶段数据与通用 ML 组件,无外部先验写入。++## 下一步++γ=0.5 的线性混合牺牲了 covariation(48→28.6);更优方向是用潜位移做"真实细胞选择/组成调制"(对 z_pred 取最近真实末阶段细胞)而非数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把解码 dz 投回基因空间做保稀疏位移(与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合)。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..33b0567--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@+"""Gaussian VAE latent transition (family: generative_latent).++Train a small Gaussian VAE on HVGs of the input stage(s), couple the last two+input stages with entropic OT in latent space, build a per-cell displacement+field by kNN-weighted local regression over the source stage's displacements,+extrapolate the last stage's latents toward the target and decode. Non-HVG+genes keep the last stage's values. Single-input fallback: autoencode the only+input stage (no transition). Everything is computed from the view; only time+DIFFERENCES are used, so the program is view/time-shift invariant.+"""+from __future__ import annotations++import argparse+import json+from pathlib import Path++import numpy as np+from scipy import sparse+++# ---------------------------------------------------------------- data view++def load_manifest(view: Path) -> dict:+ return json.loads((view / "manifest.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))+++def panel_genes(view: Path, manifest: dict) -> list[str]:+ text = (view / manifest["genes_file"]).read_text(encoding="utf-8")+ return [ln.strip() for ln in text.splitlines() if ln.strip()]+++def covered_mask(view: Path, entry: dict, genes: list[str]) -> np.ndarray:+ if entry.get("genes_file"):+ text = (view / entry["genes_file"]).read_text(encoding="utf-8")+ have = {ln.strip() for ln in text.splitlines() if ln.strip()}+ return np.fromiter((g in have for g in genes), dtype=bool, count=len(genes))+ return np.ones(len(genes), dtype=bool)+++def read_input(view: Path, entry: dict, genes: list[str]) -> sparse.csr_matrix:+ """CSR float32 on the panel in panel order (self-contained; no src dep)."""+ import anndata as ad++ a = ad.read_h5ad(view / entry["path"])+ names = [str(g) for g in a.var_names]+ X = a.X+ X = X.tocsr() if sparse.issparse(X) else sparse.csr_matrix(np.asarray(X))+ X = X.astype(np.float32)+ if names == genes:+ return X.tocsr()+ pos = {g: i for i, g in enumerate(names)}+ cols = np.array([pos.get(g, -1) for g in genes], dtype=np.int64)+ keep = cols >= 0+ sub = X.tocsc()[:, cols[keep]].tocsc()+ keep_idx = np.flatnonzero(keep)+ per_col = np.zeros(len(genes), dtype=np.int64)+ per_col[keep_idx] = np.diff(sub.indptr)+ indptr = np.concatenate([[0], np.cumsum(per_col)])+ full = sparse.csc_matrix((sub.data, sub.indices, indptr), shape=(X.shape[0], len(genes)))+ return full.tocsr()+++# ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VAE++def make_vae(d_total: int, d_in: int, latent: int):+ import torch.nn as nn++ class VAE(nn.Module):+ def __init__(self):+ super().__init__()+ self.enc = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(d_total, 256), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(256, 64), nn.ReLU())+ self.mu = nn.Linear(64, latent)+ self.logvar = nn.Linear(64, latent)+ self.dec = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(latent, 64), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(64, 256), nn.ReLU(),+ nn.Linear(256, d_in))++ def forward(self, x):+ h = self.enc(x)+ return self.mu(h), self.logvar(h).clamp(-8.0, 2.0)++ return VAE()+++def train_vae(Xh: np.ndarray, cov: np.ndarray | None, latent: int, kl: float,+ epochs: int, seed: int):+ import torch++ torch.manual_seed(seed)+ torch.set_num_threads(4)+ d_in = Xh.shape[1]+ d_total = d_in + (0 if cov is None else cov.shape[1])+ model = make_vae(d_total, d_in, latent)+ opt = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3)+ X = torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Xh, dtype=np.float32))+ if cov is not None:+ X = torch.cat([X, torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(cov, dtype=np.float32))], dim=1)+ n = X.shape[0]+ g = torch.Generator().manual_seed(seed)+ bs = 256+ model.train()+ for _ in range(epochs):+ perm = torch.randperm(n, generator=g)+ for i in range(0, n, bs):+ xb = X[perm[i:i + bs]]+ mu, logvar = model(xb)+ z = mu + torch.randn_like(mu) * torch.exp(0.5 * logvar)+ rec = model.dec(z)+ mse = ((rec - xb[:, :d_in]) ** 2).mean()+ kll = (-0.5 * (1 + logvar - mu.pow(2) - logvar.exp())).sum(-1).mean()+ loss = mse + kl * kll+ opt.zero_grad()+ loss.backward()+ opt.step()+ model.eval()+ return model, d_in+++def encode_mean(model, d_in: int, Xh: np.ndarray, cov: np.ndarray | None) -> np.ndarray:+ import torch++ with torch.no_grad():+ X = torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Xh, dtype=np.float32))+ if cov is not None:+ X = torch.cat([X, torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(cov, dtype=np.float32))], dim=1)+ mu, _ = model(X)+ return mu.numpy().astype(np.float64)+++def decode(model, Z: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:+ import torch++ with torch.no_grad():+ return model.dec(torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Z, dtype=np.float32))).numpy()+++# --------------------------------------------------------------------- main++def main(argv=None):+ ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()+ ap.add_argument("--data", required=True)+ ap.add_argument("--out", required=True)+ ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, required=True)+ ap.add_argument("--hvg", type=int, default=2000)+ ap.add_argument("--latent", type=int, default=20)+ ap.add_argument("--kl", type=float, default=0.005)+ ap.add_argument("--epochs", type=int, default=100)+ ap.add_argument("--quantile-match", type=int, default=1)+ ap.add_argument("--k", type=int, default=15)+ ap.add_argument("--ot-reg", type=float, default=0.1)+ ap.add_argument("--ot-cap", type=int, default=3000)+ ap.add_argument("--train-cap", type=int, default=10000)+ ap.add_argument("--transition-scale", type=float, default=1.0,+ help="-1: auto = clip(dt_target/dt_input, 0, 2); 0 disables the mechanism (control)")+ ap.add_argument("--no-covariate", action="store_true")+ ap.add_argument("--blend-gamma", type=float, default=0.5,+ help="HVG output = (1-g)*last-stage real values + g*quantile-matched decode")+ args = ap.parse_args(argv)++ view = Path(args.data)+ man = load_manifest(view)+ genes = panel_genes(view, man)+ rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)++ inputs = sorted(man["inputs"], key=lambda e: e["time"])+ masks = [covered_mask(view, e, genes) for e in inputs]+ Xs = [read_input(view, e, genes) for e in inputs]++ n_last = Xs[-1].shape[0]+ n_out = int(np.clip(n_last, man["min_cells"], man["max_cells"]))+ rows_out = np.sort(rng.choice(n_last, size=n_out, replace=n_out > n_last))++ # HVGs among genes covered by every input stage+ cov_all = np.logical_and.reduce(masks)+ var_tot = np.zeros(len(genes), dtype=np.float64)+ for X in Xs:+ Xc = X[:, cov_all]+ m = np.asarray(Xc.mean(axis=0)).ravel()+ m2 = np.asarray(Xc.multiply(Xc).mean(axis=0)).ravel()+ var_tot[cov_all] += np.maximum(m2 - m * m, 0)+ cand = np.flatnonzero(cov_all)+ order = cand[np.argsort(-var_tot[cand], kind="stable")]+ hvg = np.sort(order[: args.hvg])++ # standardisation stats over all input cells+ S = sparse.vstack([X[:, hvg] for X in Xs]).tocsr()+ mu_g = np.asarray(S.mean(axis=0)).ravel().astype(np.float64)+ sd_g = np.sqrt(np.maximum(np.asarray(S.multiply(S).mean(axis=0)).ravel() - mu_g ** 2, 0))+ sd_g[sd_g < 1e-6] = 1.0+ del S++ A = [np.asarray(X[:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32) for X in Xs]+ A = [((D - mu_g) / sd_g).astype(np.float32) for D in A]+ use_cov = not args.no_covariate+ n_st = len(A)++ def cov_of(si: int, n: int) -> np.ndarray | None:+ if not use_cov:+ return None+ c = np.zeros((n, n_st), dtype=np.float32)+ c[:, si] = 1.0+ return c++ # train (cap cells per stage)+ train_parts, cov_parts = [], []+ for si, D in enumerate(A):+ n = D.shape[0]+ idx = np.arange(n) if n <= args.train_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n, args.train_cap, replace=False))+ train_parts.append(D[idx])+ cov_parts.append(cov_of(si, len(idx)))+ Xt = np.vstack(train_parts)+ covt = np.vstack([c for c in cov_parts if c is not None]) if use_cov else None+ model, d_in = train_vae(Xt, covt, args.latent, args.kl, args.epochs, args.seed)+ del Xt, covt, train_parts, cov_parts++ Z = [encode_mean(model, d_in, D, cov_of(si, D.shape[0])) for si, D in enumerate(A)]++ scale = args.transition_scale+ if scale < 0:+ if n_st >= 2:+ dt_in = inputs[-1]["time"] - inputs[0]["time"]+ dt_tg = man["target"]["time"] - inputs[-1]["time"]+ scale = float(np.clip(dt_tg / dt_in, 0.0, 2.0)) if dt_in > 0 else 1.0+ else:+ scale = 0.0++ # ---- latent displacement field (needs >=2 stages and scale > 0)+ dz_out = None+ if n_st >= 2 and scale > 0:+ import ot++ Z0f, Z1f = Z[-2], Z[-1]+ n0, n1 = Z0f.shape[0], Z1f.shape[0]+ i0 = np.arange(n0) if n0 <= args.ot_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n0, args.ot_cap, replace=False))+ i1 = np.arange(n1) if n1 <= args.ot_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n1, args.ot_cap, replace=False))+ P0, P1 = Z0f[i0], Z1f[i1]+ M = ((P0[:, None, :] - P1[None, :, :]) ** 2).sum(-1)+ M /= max(np.median(M), 1e-8)+ a = np.full(len(i0), 1.0 / len(i0))+ b = np.full(len(i1), 1.0 / len(i1))+ Pi = ot.sinkhorn(a, b, M, args.ot_reg, numItermax=300, stopThr=1e-8)+ Pi = np.nan_to_num(Pi, nan=0.0, posinf=0.0, neginf=0.0)+ rs = Pi.sum(axis=1, keepdims=True)+ rs[rs <= 0] = 1.0+ delta = (Pi / rs) @ P1 - P0 # per-source-cell displacement+ # kNN-weighted local regression: dz for every last-stage cell (chunked)+ dz_all = np.zeros_like(Z1f)+ k = min(args.k, len(i0))+ for s in range(0, n1, 1024):+ Zq = Z1f[s:s + 1024]+ d2 = ((Zq[:, None, :] - P0[None, :, :]) ** 2).sum(-1)+ knn = np.argpartition(d2, k - 1, axis=1)[:, :k]+ dk = np.take_along_axis(d2, knn, axis=1)+ h = max(np.median(dk[:, -1]), 1e-8)+ w = np.exp(-dk / h)+ w /= w.sum(axis=1, keepdims=True)+ dz_all[s:s + 1024] = np.einsum("ij,ijk->ik", w, delta[knn])+ dz_out = dz_all[rows_out]+ nrm = np.linalg.norm(dz_all, axis=1)+ print(f"[mech] ||dz|| mean={nrm.mean():.4f} cv={nrm.std() / max(nrm.mean(), 1e-9):.4f} "+ f"scale={scale:.3f} ||delta||={np.linalg.norm(delta, axis=1).mean():.4f}", flush=True)++ # ---- predict latents for output cells, decode+ Zp = Z[-1][rows_out].copy()+ if dz_out is not None:+ Zp += scale * dz_out+ Dp = decode(model, Zp.astype(np.float32)) * sd_g + mu_g+ Dp[~np.isfinite(Dp)] = 0.0+ if args.quantile_match:+ # per-gene quantile match: map decoded ranks onto the last stage's+ # empirical marginal (restores sparsity / value distribution per gene)+ E = np.asarray(Xs[-1][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32) # n_last x hvg+ E.sort(axis=0)+ q = (np.argsort(np.argsort(Dp, axis=0), axis=0).astype(np.float64) + 0.5) / Dp.shape[0]+ idx = np.minimum((q * E.shape[0]).astype(np.int64), E.shape[0] - 1)+ Dp = np.take_along_axis(E, idx, axis=0).astype(np.float32)+ del E+ np.maximum(Dp, 0.0, out=Dp)+ Dp[Dp < 0.01] = 0.0++ # ---- assemble full-panel output: last stage's values, HVGs blended+ Xout = Xs[-1][rows_out].toarray().astype(np.float32)+ g = float(np.clip(args.blend_gamma, 0.0, 1.0))+ if g > 0:+ Xout[:, hvg] = (1.0 - g) * Xout[:, hvg] + g * Dp+ Xout[~np.isfinite(Xout)] = 0.0++ import anndata as ad+ import pandas as pd+ adata = ad.AnnData(X=sparse.csr_matrix(Xout),+ obs=pd.DataFrame(index=[f"c{i}" for i in range(Xout.shape[0])]),+ var=pd.DataFrame(index=list(genes)))+ adata.X.eliminate_zeros()+ adata.write_h5ad(args.out)+ print(f"[out] {adata.shape} nnz/cell={adata.X.nnz / adata.shape[0]:.0f} "+ f"input nnz/cell={Xs[-1].nnz / n_last:.0f}", flush=True)+++if __name__ == "__main__":+ main()
调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。
用到的知识库条目
| 编号 | 标题 | 出处 |
|---|---|---|
| k035 | Latent generative models offline: scVI (scvi-tools) and diffusion/flow generators (scDiffusion, CFGen) | 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 (scVI); 10.1038/s41587-021-01206-w (scvi-tools); 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae518 (scDiffusion); arXiv:2407.11734 (CFGen) |
| k030 | Why latent world models (JEPA/OPF) are not a T1 starting point | notes/competition/03_solution_landscape.md |
| k032 | Neural ODE population dynamics from snapshots: TrajectoryNet, PRESCIENT, MIOFlow, scNODE | arXiv:2002.04461 (TrajectoryNet); 10.1038/s41467-021-23518-w (PRESCIENT); arXiv:2206.14928 (MIOFlow); 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae393 (scNODE) |
分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。
| 改了什么 | 新建 generative_latent 方案:HVG2000 上训练 Gaussian VAE(kl=0.005, latent=20, CPU),末两输入阶段潜码做 entropic-OT 耦合 + kNN(k=15) 局部回归得逐细胞位移 dz,外推解码后按基因分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布,再以 γ=0.5 与末阶段真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。 |
|---|---|
| 各组分数的变化 | cell_state:变好:68.25 vs 50.07(+18.18,主要来自 QM+γ=0.5 与真实值混合,非潜位移本身) covariation:变坏:28.78 vs 52.52(-23.74,PLAN 期望该组变好,实际大幅恶化) de_recovery:变坏:42.11 vs 51.38(-9.27,远超 T1 约 2 分噪声) direction:噪声内:49.19 vs 49.14(+0.05) |
| family_id | generative_latent |
| 假设是否成立 | 否 |
| 经验 |
|
| mechanism_active | 是 |
| 下一步建议 |
|
对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。
只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。
分析员
| 角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。 | 分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。 | 3 |
| 工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。 | 共 2 次:bash 1、write 1 |
| 用时 | 不到 1 分 |
| token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。 | 输入 11,208 · 输出 1,112 · 思考 702 |
| 任务(第一行) | 分析节点 n15 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | ANALYSIS.json written |
| 原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/analyst.jsonl 8 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/analyst.stderr |
工程师
| 角色 | 工程师 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 21 |
| 工具调用 | 共 25 次:bash 21、write 4 |
| 用时 | 23 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 52,875 · 输出 13,414 · 思考 13,062 |
| 任务(第一行) | 按计划修改程序:Gaussian VAE latent transition for E9.5→E10.5 prediction |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | 完成。draft 了 generative_latent 家族:Gaussian VAE 潜空间 + entropic-OT 耦合 + kNN 局部回归逐细胞位移(||dz|| CV=0.337,机制非恒定),解码后按基因分位数匹配回真实边缘分布,再以 γ=0.5 与末阶段真实值混合。 查分(X3 A 半,5/20 次):机制关 28.0 → 纯解码+QM 42.0/43.0 → 默认(γ=0.5, scale=1, kl=0.005)**48.92**(cell_state 68.1, direction 49.2, de_recovery 42.1, covariation 28.6),vec-check 通过,默认输出与打分文件同哈希。 下一步最值得试:用潜位移做真实细胞选择/组成调制(对 z_pred 取最近真实细胞)替代数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把潜位移投回基因空间做保稀疏位移,与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合。 |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/engineer.jsonl 109 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/engineer.stderr |
调研员
| 角色 | 调研员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 1 |
| 工具调用 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 10,891 · 输出 1,162 · 思考 2,950 |
| 任务(第一行) | 为节点 n15(草稿,父节点 nNone)写改进计划 PLAN.json,思路 generative_latent |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | lls × 2000 genes should be <3 min GPU; set hard 5-min timeout. 4) Dense HVG output destroys sparsity pattern: mitigated by only replacing HVG genes. 5) With only 2 snapshots, transition direction is weakly identified (k030); keep scale conservative. 6) POT sinkhorn may be slow for large types: cap at 2000 cells/type.", "family_id": "generative_latent", "mechanism": "Gaussian VAE learns a 20-dim latent representation of input cells; a kNN-weighted local regression in latent space produces per-cell displacement vectors that depend on each cell's latent position (not just its type label), then the decoder maps displaced latents back to correlated gene expression.", "vs_constant_shift": "Per-type constant shift adds the same vector to every cell of a type. Here, dz varies within a type based on the cell's latent coordinates and its local neighborhood's observed E8.5→E9.5 displacements. Two cells of the same type at different latent positions receive different dz vectors. The decoder also produces correlated multi-gene changes rather than independent per-gene offsets.", "mechanism_evidence": "1) Report within-type coefficient of variation of ||dz||: if >0.3, displacement is genuinely cell-state-dependent. 2) Report per-group scores separately for zero-transition vs full-transition: covariation and de_recovery should improve with transition if the decoder captures gene correlations. 3) Report zero-value rate and library-size distribution of output vs input. 4) Report reconstruction MSE of zero-transition control vs copy_last to verify decoder quality.", "mechanism_off_control": "Set --transition-scale 0 (or equivalently skip the displacement step): the program encodes E9.5 cells to latent z and immediately decodes back without any shift. Expected: output ≈ input (autoencoding), scores should be within 2 points of copy_last. If zero-transition output is identical to full-transition output (scale>0), the transition mechanism is not running.", "sources": [] } ``` |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/researcher.jsonl 5 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/researcher.stderr |