Virtual Embryo Challenge更新于 10-03 18:47(北京时间) / 每 5 分钟更新

总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D

节点 n15

Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。

运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D
父节点(种子,没有父节点)
子节点n19
操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。草稿
状态已打分
分数搜索目标分 49.05 · X3 49.05
审查未审查
用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。27 分
程序版本c05a67757a314a2778d35aff4b369148d6ad245d (programs.git)

方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。

来自 programs.git c05a67757a:solution/METHOD.md

Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。

METHOD

方法族与机制(family: generative_latent,按 PLAN)

  • HVG 2000(各输入阶段都覆盖的基因,按合并方差选);标准化后进 VAE:enc 2000(+2 阶段 one-hot)→256→64→z(20),dec 20→64→256→2000,Gaussian 似然,KL 权重 0.005(PLAN 的 0.1 使潜空间塌缩,||dz||≈0.001,机制失效;实测降到 0.005 后 ||dz||≈0.41),Adam 1e-3,batch 256,100 epochs,CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。
  • 转移:Z(E8.75 类) 与 Z(E9.0 类) 之间 POT ot.sinkhorn(reg=0.1,代价按中位数归一,每阶段 ≤3000 细胞);δ_i = 重心映射 − z0_i;对每个末阶段细胞取 k=15 个最近源细胞,softmax(−d²/h)(h=中位 k 距)加权平均 δ 得 dz_j。z_pred = z_last + scale·dz,scale 默认常数 1.0(auto 模式=时间差之比 clip[0,2],X3 上为 2.0,实测略差)。
  • 解码后处理(PLAN 步骤 7 的修改,实测必要):直接把解码值写回会摧毁表达纹理(cell_state 8.9、covariation 8.4,总 28.0,远低于 copy_last)。改为 (a) 每个 HVG 基因把解码值的秩映射到末阶段该基因的经验分位数(恢复稀疏与边缘分布),(b) 与末阶段真实值按 γ=0.5 线性混合(纯解码 γ=1 时 covariation 48 但 cell_state 35;混合把 cell_state 拉到 68,代价是 covariation 降到 28.6)。clamp ≥0。
  • 单输入退路:无转移,输出=该阶段 encode-decode(自编码对照),符合 PLAN 步骤 8。
  • 视图无关:只用时间差与数据;seed 确定(np.random.default_rng(seed)、torch.manual_seed(seed),纯 CPU)。

机制生效证据

  • [mech] 日志:||dz|| mean=0.4097,within-population CV=0.337 > 0.3(PLAN 证据标准 1):位移确实随细胞潜位置变化,不是每型常数。
  • 机制开/关对照(同一程序 --transition-scale 0 vs 默认,X3 A 半,seed 0):
    • 关(scale=0,纯解码无 QM 时):28.0;关+QM+γ1 未单测;
    • 开:scale=1, γ=1, QM:42.98;scale=2, γ=1, QM:42.02;scale=1, γ=0.5, QM(默认):48.92。
    • scale=0 与 scale>0 输出不同(dz≠0),机制在跑;转移主要改变 covariation/de_recovery 方向(de_recovery 44.9→41.7,direction 49.8→49.1),而 QM+γ 混合主要修复 cell_state。
  • 输出零值率/库大小:nnz/cell 2273 vs 输入 1974(混合使部分零被填),在格式检查内合规。

验证与未验证

  • 已验证:X3 视图(E8.75+E9.0→E9.5)vec-check 通过,5 次 vec-score(28.0 / 42.0 / 43.0 / 48.9 / 48.9-默认复现同哈希)。默认输出与打分过的 g05 配置逐位相同。
  • 未验证:final(E8.5+E9.5→E10.5)与 proxy 视图未跑分(本节点只挂 X3 尺子);代码路径对单输入(proxy)有退路、对大细胞数有 cap(train 10k/阶段、OT 3k/阶段、kNN 分块),但耗时只在 X3(~3.5k 细胞,1–1.5 min)实测。γ、kl、scale 只做了粗网格,B 半与多 seed 未测。
  • 生物学知识来源:未使用禁窗(9.5<E≤13.5)或保留阶段的任何测量信息;方法只依赖视图内输入阶段数据与通用 ML 组件,无外部先验写入。

下一步

γ=0.5 的线性混合牺牲了 covariation(48→28.6);更优方向是用潜位移做"真实细胞选择/组成调制"(对 z_pred 取最近真实末阶段细胞)而非数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把解码 dz 投回基因空间做保稀疏位移(与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合)。

调研员的计划

名称Gaussian VAE latent transition for E9.5→E10.5 prediction
动机Draft of generative_latent family. Current best (node 10, rank3=60.07) uses displacement-based methods; covariation (44.24) and direction (51.05) remain weak. A VAE decoder could produce correlated gene expression changes that displacement methods miss. Node 6 (ot_cfm draft) failed, so this is the second generative attempt. No prior generative_latent node exists in the tree.
做法1) HVG selection: top 2000 genes by variance across all input cells (both stages). 2) Gaussian VAE (data is log1p(CP10k), no counts): encoder 2000→256→64→z_dim(20), decoder 20→64→256→2000, Gaussian likelihood, KL weight 0.1, Adam lr=1e-3, batch=256, 150 epochs (~3 min on GPU). Stage covariate concatenated to encoder input (one-hot). 3) Encode all cells to latent z. 4) State-dependent transition: for each cell type present in both stages, compute per-cell displacement in latent space using kNN-weighted local regression: for E9.5 cell j, find k=15 nearest E9.5 neighbors; for each neighbor i, find its nearest E8.5 partner via OT (POT sinkhorn, reg=0.1, top 2000 HVG, ≤2000 cells/type); displacement δ_i = z(E9.5 partner) − z(E8.5 partner); dz_j = weighted mean of δ_i with softmax(−dist) weights. This makes dz depend on local latent position, not just type mean. 5) Prediction: z_pred = z_E9.5 + scale·dz, where scale = (target_interval/input_interval) clipped to [0,2], default 1.0. 6) Decode z_pred → predicted HVG expression. 7) Output: predicted HVGs replace originals; non-HVG genes keep E9.5 values (preserve sparsity). Apply max(0, ·) clamp. 8) Single-stage fallback: if only one input …
风险1) Decoder reconstruction worse than copy_last (VAE smoothing): Engineer must check zero-transition control first; if it drops >2 points below copy_last, increase hidden dims or reduce latent dim to 10. 2) kNN-OT displacement collapses to per-type constant if within-type variance is small: check std of ||dz|| within each type; if CV < 0.1, mechanism is effectively constant shift. 3) Training time: 150 epochs on ~4000 cells × 2000 genes should be <3 min GPU; set hard 5-min timeout. 4) Dense HVG output destroys sparsity pattern: mitigated by only replacing HVG genes. 5) With only 2 snapshots, transition direction is weakly identified (k030); keep scale conservative. 6) POT sinkhorn may be slow for large types: cap at 2000 cells/type.

代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。

对比:这个提交的上一版(种子程序:相对空仓库)。改动的文件:solution/EXECUTION.json +1 −0、solution/METHOD.md +30 −0、solution/run.py +299 −0

diff --git a/solution/EXECUTION.json b/solution/EXECUTION.jsonnew file mode 100644index 0000000..9d5125c--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/EXECUTION.json@@ -0,0 +1 @@+{"gpu": false}diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..7a5a1c5--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@+Gaussian VAE 潜空间转移:两输入阶段潜码 entropic-OT 耦合+kNN 局部回归得逐细胞位移,外推末阶段潜码解码,HVG 分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布后以 γ=0.5 与真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。+# METHOD+++## 方法族与机制(family: generative_latent,按 PLAN)++- HVG 2000(各输入阶段都覆盖的基因,按合并方差选);标准化后进 VAE:enc 2000(+2 阶段 one-hot)→256→64→z(20),dec 20→64→256→2000,Gaussian 似然,KL 权重 **0.005**(PLAN 的 0.1 使潜空间塌缩,||dz||≈0.001,机制失效;实测降到 0.005 后 ||dz||≈0.41),Adam 1e-3,batch 256,100 epochs,CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。+- 转移:Z(E8.75 类) 与 Z(E9.0 类) 之间 POT `ot.sinkhorn`(reg=0.1,代价按中位数归一,每阶段 ≤3000 细胞);δ_i = 重心映射 − z0_i;对每个末阶段细胞取 k=15 个最近源细胞,softmax(−d²/h)(h=中位 k 距)加权平均 δ 得 dz_j。z_pred = z_last + scale·dz,scale 默认常数 1.0(auto 模式=时间差之比 clip[0,2],X3 上为 2.0,实测略差)。+- 解码后处理(PLAN 步骤 7 的修改,实测必要):直接把解码值写回会摧毁表达纹理(cell_state 8.9、covariation 8.4,总 28.0,远低于 copy_last)。改为 (a) 每个 HVG 基因把解码值的秩映射到末阶段该基因的经验分位数(恢复稀疏与边缘分布),(b) 与末阶段真实值按 γ=0.5 线性混合(纯解码 γ=1 时 covariation 48 但 cell_state 35;混合把 cell_state 拉到 68,代价是 covariation 降到 28.6)。clamp ≥0。+- 单输入退路:无转移,输出=该阶段 encode-decode(自编码对照),符合 PLAN 步骤 8。+- 视图无关:只用时间差与数据;seed 确定(np.random.default_rng(seed)、torch.manual_seed(seed),纯 CPU)。++## 机制生效证据++- `[mech]` 日志:||dz|| mean=0.4097,**within-population CV=0.337 > 0.3**(PLAN 证据标准 1):位移确实随细胞潜位置变化,不是每型常数。+- 机制开/关对照(同一程序 `--transition-scale 0` vs 默认,X3 A 半,seed 0):+  - 关(scale=0,纯解码无 QM 时):28.0;关+QM+γ1 未单测;+  - 开:scale=1, γ=1, QM:42.98;scale=2, γ=1, QM:42.02;**scale=1, γ=0.5, QM(默认):48.92**。+  - scale=0 与 scale>0 输出不同(dz≠0),机制在跑;转移主要改变 covariation/de_recovery 方向(de_recovery 44.9→41.7,direction 49.8→49.1),而 QM+γ 混合主要修复 cell_state。+- 输出零值率/库大小:nnz/cell 2273 vs 输入 1974(混合使部分零被填),在格式检查内合规。++## 验证与未验证++- 已验证:X3 视图(E8.75+E9.0→E9.5)vec-check 通过,5 次 vec-score(28.0 / 42.0 / 43.0 / 48.9 / 48.9-默认复现同哈希)。默认输出与打分过的 g05 配置逐位相同。+- 未验证:final(E8.5+E9.5→E10.5)与 proxy 视图未跑分(本节点只挂 X3 尺子);代码路径对单输入(proxy)有退路、对大细胞数有 cap(train 10k/阶段、OT 3k/阶段、kNN 分块),但耗时只在 X3(~3.5k 细胞,1–1.5 min)实测。γ、kl、scale 只做了粗网格,B 半与多 seed 未测。+- 生物学知识来源:未使用禁窗(9.5<E≤13.5)或保留阶段的任何测量信息;方法只依赖视图内输入阶段数据与通用 ML 组件,无外部先验写入。++## 下一步++γ=0.5 的线性混合牺牲了 covariation(48→28.6);更优方向是用潜位移做"真实细胞选择/组成调制"(对 z_pred 取最近真实末阶段细胞)而非数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把解码 dz 投回基因空间做保稀疏位移(与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合)。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..33b0567--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@+"""Gaussian VAE latent transition (family: generative_latent).++Train a small Gaussian VAE on HVGs of the input stage(s), couple the last two+input stages with entropic OT in latent space, build a per-cell displacement+field by kNN-weighted local regression over the source stage's displacements,+extrapolate the last stage's latents toward the target and decode. Non-HVG+genes keep the last stage's values. Single-input fallback: autoencode the only+input stage (no transition). Everything is computed from the view; only time+DIFFERENCES are used, so the program is view/time-shift invariant.+"""+from __future__ import annotations++import argparse+import json+from pathlib import Path++import numpy as np+from scipy import sparse+++# ---------------------------------------------------------------- data view++def load_manifest(view: Path) -> dict:+    return json.loads((view / "manifest.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8"))+++def panel_genes(view: Path, manifest: dict) -> list[str]:+    text = (view / manifest["genes_file"]).read_text(encoding="utf-8")+    return [ln.strip() for ln in text.splitlines() if ln.strip()]+++def covered_mask(view: Path, entry: dict, genes: list[str]) -> np.ndarray:+    if entry.get("genes_file"):+        text = (view / entry["genes_file"]).read_text(encoding="utf-8")+        have = {ln.strip() for ln in text.splitlines() if ln.strip()}+        return np.fromiter((g in have for g in genes), dtype=bool, count=len(genes))+    return np.ones(len(genes), dtype=bool)+++def read_input(view: Path, entry: dict, genes: list[str]) -> sparse.csr_matrix:+    """CSR float32 on the panel in panel order (self-contained; no src dep)."""+    import anndata as ad++    a = ad.read_h5ad(view / entry["path"])+    names = [str(g) for g in a.var_names]+    X = a.X+    X = X.tocsr() if sparse.issparse(X) else sparse.csr_matrix(np.asarray(X))+    X = X.astype(np.float32)+    if names == genes:+        return X.tocsr()+    pos = {g: i for i, g in enumerate(names)}+    cols = np.array([pos.get(g, -1) for g in genes], dtype=np.int64)+    keep = cols >= 0+    sub = X.tocsc()[:, cols[keep]].tocsc()+    keep_idx = np.flatnonzero(keep)+    per_col = np.zeros(len(genes), dtype=np.int64)+    per_col[keep_idx] = np.diff(sub.indptr)+    indptr = np.concatenate([[0], np.cumsum(per_col)])+    full = sparse.csc_matrix((sub.data, sub.indices, indptr), shape=(X.shape[0], len(genes)))+    return full.tocsr()+++# ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VAE++def make_vae(d_total: int, d_in: int, latent: int):+    import torch.nn as nn++    class VAE(nn.Module):+        def __init__(self):+            super().__init__()+            self.enc = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(d_total, 256), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(256, 64), nn.ReLU())+            self.mu = nn.Linear(64, latent)+            self.logvar = nn.Linear(64, latent)+            self.dec = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(latent, 64), nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(64, 256), nn.ReLU(),+                                     nn.Linear(256, d_in))++        def forward(self, x):+            h = self.enc(x)+            return self.mu(h), self.logvar(h).clamp(-8.0, 2.0)++    return VAE()+++def train_vae(Xh: np.ndarray, cov: np.ndarray | None, latent: int, kl: float,+              epochs: int, seed: int):+    import torch++    torch.manual_seed(seed)+    torch.set_num_threads(4)+    d_in = Xh.shape[1]+    d_total = d_in + (0 if cov is None else cov.shape[1])+    model = make_vae(d_total, d_in, latent)+    opt = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3)+    X = torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Xh, dtype=np.float32))+    if cov is not None:+        X = torch.cat([X, torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(cov, dtype=np.float32))], dim=1)+    n = X.shape[0]+    g = torch.Generator().manual_seed(seed)+    bs = 256+    model.train()+    for _ in range(epochs):+        perm = torch.randperm(n, generator=g)+        for i in range(0, n, bs):+            xb = X[perm[i:i + bs]]+            mu, logvar = model(xb)+            z = mu + torch.randn_like(mu) * torch.exp(0.5 * logvar)+            rec = model.dec(z)+            mse = ((rec - xb[:, :d_in]) ** 2).mean()+            kll = (-0.5 * (1 + logvar - mu.pow(2) - logvar.exp())).sum(-1).mean()+            loss = mse + kl * kll+            opt.zero_grad()+            loss.backward()+            opt.step()+    model.eval()+    return model, d_in+++def encode_mean(model, d_in: int, Xh: np.ndarray, cov: np.ndarray | None) -> np.ndarray:+    import torch++    with torch.no_grad():+        X = torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Xh, dtype=np.float32))+        if cov is not None:+            X = torch.cat([X, torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(cov, dtype=np.float32))], dim=1)+        mu, _ = model(X)+        return mu.numpy().astype(np.float64)+++def decode(model, Z: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:+    import torch++    with torch.no_grad():+        return model.dec(torch.from_numpy(np.ascontiguousarray(Z, dtype=np.float32))).numpy()+++# --------------------------------------------------------------------- main++def main(argv=None):+    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()+    ap.add_argument("--data", required=True)+    ap.add_argument("--out", required=True)+    ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, required=True)+    ap.add_argument("--hvg", type=int, default=2000)+    ap.add_argument("--latent", type=int, default=20)+    ap.add_argument("--kl", type=float, default=0.005)+    ap.add_argument("--epochs", type=int, default=100)+    ap.add_argument("--quantile-match", type=int, default=1)+    ap.add_argument("--k", type=int, default=15)+    ap.add_argument("--ot-reg", type=float, default=0.1)+    ap.add_argument("--ot-cap", type=int, default=3000)+    ap.add_argument("--train-cap", type=int, default=10000)+    ap.add_argument("--transition-scale", type=float, default=1.0,+                    help="-1: auto = clip(dt_target/dt_input, 0, 2); 0 disables the mechanism (control)")+    ap.add_argument("--no-covariate", action="store_true")+    ap.add_argument("--blend-gamma", type=float, default=0.5,+                    help="HVG output = (1-g)*last-stage real values + g*quantile-matched decode")+    args = ap.parse_args(argv)++    view = Path(args.data)+    man = load_manifest(view)+    genes = panel_genes(view, man)+    rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)++    inputs = sorted(man["inputs"], key=lambda e: e["time"])+    masks = [covered_mask(view, e, genes) for e in inputs]+    Xs = [read_input(view, e, genes) for e in inputs]++    n_last = Xs[-1].shape[0]+    n_out = int(np.clip(n_last, man["min_cells"], man["max_cells"]))+    rows_out = np.sort(rng.choice(n_last, size=n_out, replace=n_out > n_last))++    # HVGs among genes covered by every input stage+    cov_all = np.logical_and.reduce(masks)+    var_tot = np.zeros(len(genes), dtype=np.float64)+    for X in Xs:+        Xc = X[:, cov_all]+        m = np.asarray(Xc.mean(axis=0)).ravel()+        m2 = np.asarray(Xc.multiply(Xc).mean(axis=0)).ravel()+        var_tot[cov_all] += np.maximum(m2 - m * m, 0)+    cand = np.flatnonzero(cov_all)+    order = cand[np.argsort(-var_tot[cand], kind="stable")]+    hvg = np.sort(order[: args.hvg])++    # standardisation stats over all input cells+    S = sparse.vstack([X[:, hvg] for X in Xs]).tocsr()+    mu_g = np.asarray(S.mean(axis=0)).ravel().astype(np.float64)+    sd_g = np.sqrt(np.maximum(np.asarray(S.multiply(S).mean(axis=0)).ravel() - mu_g ** 2, 0))+    sd_g[sd_g < 1e-6] = 1.0+    del S++    A = [np.asarray(X[:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32) for X in Xs]+    A = [((D - mu_g) / sd_g).astype(np.float32) for D in A]+    use_cov = not args.no_covariate+    n_st = len(A)++    def cov_of(si: int, n: int) -> np.ndarray | None:+        if not use_cov:+            return None+        c = np.zeros((n, n_st), dtype=np.float32)+        c[:, si] = 1.0+        return c++    # train (cap cells per stage)+    train_parts, cov_parts = [], []+    for si, D in enumerate(A):+        n = D.shape[0]+        idx = np.arange(n) if n <= args.train_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n, args.train_cap, replace=False))+        train_parts.append(D[idx])+        cov_parts.append(cov_of(si, len(idx)))+    Xt = np.vstack(train_parts)+    covt = np.vstack([c for c in cov_parts if c is not None]) if use_cov else None+    model, d_in = train_vae(Xt, covt, args.latent, args.kl, args.epochs, args.seed)+    del Xt, covt, train_parts, cov_parts++    Z = [encode_mean(model, d_in, D, cov_of(si, D.shape[0])) for si, D in enumerate(A)]++    scale = args.transition_scale+    if scale < 0:+        if n_st >= 2:+            dt_in = inputs[-1]["time"] - inputs[0]["time"]+            dt_tg = man["target"]["time"] - inputs[-1]["time"]+            scale = float(np.clip(dt_tg / dt_in, 0.0, 2.0)) if dt_in > 0 else 1.0+        else:+            scale = 0.0++    # ---- latent displacement field (needs >=2 stages and scale > 0)+    dz_out = None+    if n_st >= 2 and scale > 0:+        import ot++        Z0f, Z1f = Z[-2], Z[-1]+        n0, n1 = Z0f.shape[0], Z1f.shape[0]+        i0 = np.arange(n0) if n0 <= args.ot_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n0, args.ot_cap, replace=False))+        i1 = np.arange(n1) if n1 <= args.ot_cap else np.sort(rng.choice(n1, args.ot_cap, replace=False))+        P0, P1 = Z0f[i0], Z1f[i1]+        M = ((P0[:, None, :] - P1[None, :, :]) ** 2).sum(-1)+        M /= max(np.median(M), 1e-8)+        a = np.full(len(i0), 1.0 / len(i0))+        b = np.full(len(i1), 1.0 / len(i1))+        Pi = ot.sinkhorn(a, b, M, args.ot_reg, numItermax=300, stopThr=1e-8)+        Pi = np.nan_to_num(Pi, nan=0.0, posinf=0.0, neginf=0.0)+        rs = Pi.sum(axis=1, keepdims=True)+        rs[rs <= 0] = 1.0+        delta = (Pi / rs) @ P1 - P0                      # per-source-cell displacement+        # kNN-weighted local regression: dz for every last-stage cell (chunked)+        dz_all = np.zeros_like(Z1f)+        k = min(args.k, len(i0))+        for s in range(0, n1, 1024):+            Zq = Z1f[s:s + 1024]+            d2 = ((Zq[:, None, :] - P0[None, :, :]) ** 2).sum(-1)+            knn = np.argpartition(d2, k - 1, axis=1)[:, :k]+            dk = np.take_along_axis(d2, knn, axis=1)+            h = max(np.median(dk[:, -1]), 1e-8)+            w = np.exp(-dk / h)+            w /= w.sum(axis=1, keepdims=True)+            dz_all[s:s + 1024] = np.einsum("ij,ijk->ik", w, delta[knn])+        dz_out = dz_all[rows_out]+        nrm = np.linalg.norm(dz_all, axis=1)+        print(f"[mech] ||dz|| mean={nrm.mean():.4f} cv={nrm.std() / max(nrm.mean(), 1e-9):.4f} "+              f"scale={scale:.3f} ||delta||={np.linalg.norm(delta, axis=1).mean():.4f}", flush=True)++    # ---- predict latents for output cells, decode+    Zp = Z[-1][rows_out].copy()+    if dz_out is not None:+        Zp += scale * dz_out+    Dp = decode(model, Zp.astype(np.float32)) * sd_g + mu_g+    Dp[~np.isfinite(Dp)] = 0.0+    if args.quantile_match:+        # per-gene quantile match: map decoded ranks onto the last stage's+        # empirical marginal (restores sparsity / value distribution per gene)+        E = np.asarray(Xs[-1][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32)  # n_last x hvg+        E.sort(axis=0)+        q = (np.argsort(np.argsort(Dp, axis=0), axis=0).astype(np.float64) + 0.5) / Dp.shape[0]+        idx = np.minimum((q * E.shape[0]).astype(np.int64), E.shape[0] - 1)+        Dp = np.take_along_axis(E, idx, axis=0).astype(np.float32)+        del E+    np.maximum(Dp, 0.0, out=Dp)+    Dp[Dp < 0.01] = 0.0++    # ---- assemble full-panel output: last stage's values, HVGs blended+    Xout = Xs[-1][rows_out].toarray().astype(np.float32)+    g = float(np.clip(args.blend_gamma, 0.0, 1.0))+    if g > 0:+        Xout[:, hvg] = (1.0 - g) * Xout[:, hvg] + g * Dp+    Xout[~np.isfinite(Xout)] = 0.0++    import anndata as ad+    import pandas as pd+    adata = ad.AnnData(X=sparse.csr_matrix(Xout),+                       obs=pd.DataFrame(index=[f"c{i}" for i in range(Xout.shape[0])]),+                       var=pd.DataFrame(index=list(genes)))+    adata.X.eliminate_zeros()+    adata.write_h5ad(args.out)+    print(f"[out] {adata.shape} nnz/cell={adata.X.nnz / adata.shape[0]:.0f} "+          f"input nnz/cell={Xs[-1].nnz / n_last:.0f}", flush=True)+++if __name__ == "__main__":+    main()

调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。

用到的知识库条目

编号标题出处
k035Latent generative models offline: scVI (scvi-tools) and diffusion/flow generators (scDiffusion, CFGen)10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 (scVI); 10.1038/s41587-021-01206-w (scvi-tools); 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae518 (scDiffusion); arXiv:2407.11734 (CFGen)
k030Why latent world models (JEPA/OPF) are not a T1 starting pointnotes/competition/03_solution_landscape.md
k032Neural ODE population dynamics from snapshots: TrajectoryNet, PRESCIENT, MIOFlow, scNODEarXiv:2002.04461 (TrajectoryNet); 10.1038/s41467-021-23518-w (PRESCIENT); arXiv:2206.14928 (MIOFlow); 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae393 (scNODE)

分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。

改了什么新建 generative_latent 方案:HVG2000 上训练 Gaussian VAE(kl=0.005, latent=20, CPU),末两输入阶段潜码做 entropic-OT 耦合 + kNN(k=15) 局部回归得逐细胞位移 dz,外推解码后按基因分位数匹配回末阶段边缘分布,再以 γ=0.5 与末阶段真实值混合;非 HVG 保留末阶段值。
各组分数的变化cell_state:变好:68.25 vs 50.07(+18.18,主要来自 QM+γ=0.5 与真实值混合,非潜位移本身)
covariation:变坏:28.78 vs 52.52(-23.74,PLAN 期望该组变好,实际大幅恶化)
de_recovery:变坏:42.11 vs 51.38(-9.27,远超 T1 约 2 分噪声)
direction:噪声内:49.19 vs 49.14(+0.05)
family_idgenerative_latent
假设是否成立否
经验
  1. VAE kl 权重 0.1 会使潜空间塌缩(||dz||≈0.001,位移机制失效),降到 0.005 后 ||dz||≈0.41、within-pop CV=0.337,位移才真正随细胞状态变化。
  2. 解码值直接写回会摧毁表达纹理( Engineer 实测总分 28.0);按基因分位数匹配回真实边缘分布是必要修复(28.0→42~43),但纯解码仍不敌 copy_last 类基线。
  3. 在 X3 上,γ=0.5 与末阶段真实值线性混合把 cell_state 拉到 ~68(+18),但同一操作把 covariation 从 48 压到 28.6(-24):数值混合保边缘分布、毁基因间相关结构,两组呈此消彼长。
  4. 总榜分 49.05 vs best_seed 50.65(-1.60)在 T1 约 2 分噪声内,但分组结构变化巨大且方向相反,说明总分可能掩盖组间的相互抵消,评估必须看分组。
  5. Engineer 只在 X3 上调参(γ、kl、scale 粗网格),B 半与多 seed 未测;本节点 T1:val 即 X3 组件,调参视图与打分视图重合,存在过拟合 X3 的风险。
  6. 耗时 131.6s vs 对照 10.7s(约 12 倍),CPU 训练 VAE + POT sinkhorn 是主要开销;内存 1.61GB 未超对照。
mechanism_active是
下一步建议
  1. 针对 covariation:放弃 γ 数值混合,改用潜位移做真实细胞选择——对 z_pred 在末阶段真实细胞潜码中取最近邻(或其 kNN 加权)作为输出,预期同时保住 cell_state 与基因相关结构;可在 X3 上先与 γ=0.5 版对比 covariation/de_recovery。
  2. 针对 de_recovery(-9.27):把潜位移 dz 经 VAE 解码器 Jacobian 或直接差分 decode(z+dz)-decode(z) 投回基因空间,作为保稀疏的加性位移叠加到末阶段真实值上,而不是替换/混合整个 HVG 表达。
  3. 针对机制强度:在 B 半与至少 2 个 seed 上复测默认配置,确认 ||dz|| CV>0.3 与 48.9 的分数不是 X3/A 半特异;再对 γ∈{0.3,0.5,0.7} 与 scale∈{0.5,1} 做小组网格,报告四分组分数而非总分。

对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。

只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。

分析员

角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。3
工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。共 2 次:bash 1、write 1
用时不到 1 分
token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。输入 11,208 · 输出 1,112 · 思考 702
任务(第一行)分析节点 n15 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json
最后的回答(摘录)
ANALYSIS.json written
原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/analyst.jsonl 8 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/analyst.stderr

工程师

角色工程师 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数21
工具调用共 25 次:bash 21、write 4
用时23 分
token 数输入 52,875 · 输出 13,414 · 思考 13,062
任务(第一行)按计划修改程序:Gaussian VAE latent transition for E9.5→E10.5 prediction
最后的回答(摘录)
完成。draft 了 generative_latent 家族:Gaussian VAE 潜空间 + entropic-OT 耦合 + kNN 局部回归逐细胞位移(||dz|| CV=0.337,机制非恒定),解码后按基因分位数匹配回真实边缘分布,再以 γ=0.5 与末阶段真实值混合。

查分(X3 A 半,5/20 次):机制关 28.0 → 纯解码+QM 42.0/43.0 → 默认(γ=0.5, scale=1, kl=0.005)**48.92**(cell_state 68.1, direction 49.2, de_recovery 42.1, covariation 28.6),vec-check 通过,默认输出与打分文件同哈希。

下一步最值得试:用潜位移做真实细胞选择/组成调制(对 z_pred 取最近真实细胞)替代数值混合,可同时保住 cell_state 与 covariation;或把潜位移投回基因空间做保稀疏位移,与节点 4/5/9 的强部件组合。
原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/engineer.jsonl 109 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/engineer.stderr

调研员

角色调研员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数1
工具调用共 0 次:—
用时1 分
token 数输入 10,891 · 输出 1,162 · 思考 2,950
任务(第一行)为节点 n15(草稿,父节点 nNone)写改进计划 PLAN.json,思路 generative_latent
最后的回答(摘录)
lls × 2000 genes should be <3 min GPU; set hard 5-min timeout. 4) Dense HVG output destroys sparsity pattern: mitigated by only replacing HVG genes. 5) With only 2 snapshots, transition direction is weakly identified (k030); keep scale conservative. 6) POT sinkhorn may be slow for large types: cap at 2000 cells/type.",
  "family_id": "generative_latent",
  "mechanism": "Gaussian VAE learns a 20-dim latent representation of input cells; a kNN-weighted local regression in latent space produces per-cell displacement vectors that depend on each cell's latent position (not just its type label), then the decoder maps displaced latents back to correlated gene expression.",
  "vs_constant_shift": "Per-type constant shift adds the same vector to every cell of a type. Here, dz varies within a type based on the cell's latent coordinates and its local neighborhood's observed E8.5→E9.5 displacements. Two cells of the same type at different latent positions receive different dz vectors. The decoder also produces correlated multi-gene changes rather than independent per-gene offsets.",
  "mechanism_evidence": "1) Report within-type coefficient of variation of ||dz||: if >0.3, displacement is genuinely cell-state-dependent. 2) Report per-group scores separately for zero-transition vs full-transition: covariation and de_recovery should improve with transition if the decoder captures gene correlations. 3) Report zero-value rate and library-size distribution of output vs input. 4) Report reconstruction MSE of zero-transition control vs copy_last to verify decoder quality.",
  "mechanism_off_control": "Set --transition-scale 0 (or equivalently skip the displacement step): the program encodes E9.5 cells to latent z and immediately decodes back without any shift. Expected: output ≈ input (autoencoding), scores should be within 2 points of copy_last. If zero-transition output is identical to full-transition output (scale>0), the transition mechanism is not running.",
  "sources": []
}
```
原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/researcher.jsonl 5 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-D/nodes/15/researcher.stderr