总览 · ← 返回运行 20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake
节点 n3
heart_jcf_peri reweighting, heart x1.5, edge x0.15 (fake Engineer, node 3)
| 运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。 | 20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake |
|---|---|
| 父节点 | n2 |
| 子节点 | — |
| 操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。 | 改进 |
| 状态 | 已打分 |
| 分数 | 搜索目标分 47.14(-1.6) · X3 47.14(-1.6) |
| 审查 | 未审查 |
| 用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。 | 不到 1 分 |
| 程序版本 | 94d43e0eec66171c132b4428f344d42a6dc6db8d (programs.git) |
方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。
来自 programs.git 94d43e0eec:solution/METHOD.md
heart_jcf_peri reweighting, heart x1.5, edge x0.15 (fake Engineer, node 3)
Test run only.
调研员的计划
| 名称 | relay-plan-3 |
|---|---|
| 动机 | test node 3 through the fake relay. [compliance: removed] |
| 做法 | perturb the heart / edge weights of the parent's reweighting |
| 风险 | none (fake) |
代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。
对比:父节点版本 cc8f8620e0。改动的文件:solution/METHOD.md +2 −71、solution/README.md +0 −4、solution/run.py +16 −184
diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdindex 3bc5139..55c6490 100644--- a/solution/METHOD.md+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -1,72 +1,3 @@-# composition_trend — type-level composition reweighting + within-type maturity selection+heart_jcf_peri reweighting, heart x1.5, edge x0.15 (fake Engineer, node 3) -**Provenance.** Derived from agent-produced node 33 of run `20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-A-era`-(programs.git `refs/nodes/33`, commit `10400ee`; the program behind the official T1:val 50.1, submissions.tsv-2026-10-02). The mechanism and every constant are the node's own defaults; nothing was re-tuned. What was removed,-for the seed contract only (2026-10-03):--- the external-maturity axis `A_EXT` (read manifest `source == "external"`; a view-identity read; it never fired on- final / proxy / patched X3);-- the multi-stage pooling `POOL`, the composition-trajectory axis `A_TR`, the kNN expression smoothing `A_S`, the- apoptosis / cell-level proliferation terms (all 0 in the node's submitted defaults) and the CellRank fate mode;-- the `inputs_by_time(include_external=False)` base selection: the base is simply the latest input stage by time;-- the `VEC_*` environment overrides (constants are fixed in the code).--On every current neutral view (final, proxy, X1, X3–X6) the seed and node 33 select the same cells; see the admission-record for the digest check. The mechanism-split study (`notes/reports/dev/2026-10-02_mech_split_50.md`, candidate-`r1A:CUS` = `r1A:CU`) is the analysis of exactly this procedure.--**Naming.** "trend" is descriptive, not a two-stage model: the type weights come from a single snapshot (types whose-cells are, on average, less proliferative get a larger share). On the official final view this moves the predicted-pseudobulk along the previous step's direction (cosine with E9.5 − E8.5: 0.33 for the composition part, 0.34 for the-whole procedure; mech_split §4), and in the E8.5 → E9.5 rehearsal the composition part carries most of the gain-(+10.0 of +11.4 points; mech_split §2.1). Nothing in the code reads a second stage.--Contract: `python run.py --data <view> --out <pred.h5ad> --seed <int>`; CPU only (`EXECUTION.json {"gpu": false}`).--## Method--Base = the latest input stage of the view (final: E9.5; proxy: E8.5; rulers: their last input), all cells, its own-`celltype` labels (whatever vocabulary the view provides; `Unknown` is an ordinary type).--1. **Cell scores** (generic gene-set means, z-scored over the stage, clipped at ±3): proliferation (34 cell-cycle- genes), metabolic maturity `z_met` = OXPHOS (13 genes) − glycolysis (10 genes).-2. **Within-type commitment** `z_fate`: HVG 2000 → PCA 30 → kNN 30 → diffusion map 15 → diffusion pseudotime rooted- at the most progenitor-like cell (argmax 2·z_prolif − z_met, first index on ties); z-scored, the type mean- removed, z-scored again (only the order inside a type matters).-3. **Weights.** Type layer `w_t = exp(−0.55 · z(type-mean z_prolif))` (types with < 5 cells: 1). Cell layer- `w_i = exp(1.2 · z_met_i + 0.6 · z_fate_i)`. `w = clip(w_t · w_i, 1e-6, 1e6)`.-4. **Sampling.** n = the stage's cell count clipped to [min_cells, max_cells] (final: 5,118 of 17,057). Per-type- quota ∝ the type's weight sum (largest remainder, capped by type size, overflow re-apportioned); inside a type 5- equal-frequency `z_met` strata, stratum quotas ∝ stratum weight sums, Efraimidis–Spirakis weighted sampling- without replacement inside a stratum. Expression values are copied unchanged.--Mechanism-off controls (for analysis; not code switches): `A_TP = 0` leaves the input composition (mech_split "U");-`A_CM = A_FATE = 0` with the same per-type quotas is uniform within type (mech_split "C").--## Data / knowledge used--Only the latest input stage of the view. Generic knowledge: textbook cell-cycle, OXPHOS and glycolysis gene sets-(pathway membership, not stage measurements). No held-out stage, no information from (E9.5, E13.5], no external-dataset, no `uns.celltype_palette`, no frozen probe, no pre-trained weights.--## Hyper-parameters--| Name | Value | Where it came from |-|---|---|---|-| `A_TP` | −0.55 | node 33's default (tuned by the agent on the old proxy / proxy2) |-| `A_CM` | 1.2 | node 33's default (same) |-| `A_FATE` | 0.6 | node 33's default (agent scan +0.2 … +1.0 on proxy seed 0, peak at 0.6) |-| `K_STRAT`, `MIN_TYPE_CELLS` | 5, 5 | node 33's defaults |-| HVG / PCA / kNN / diffmap | 2000 / 30 / 30 / 15 | node 33's defaults |--All were chosen on the old single-input proxy (E8.5 → E9.5), which is also where they look best; on the two-input-rulers the mechanism is near neutral (admission record).--## Known failure modes--- The type layer is a single-snapshot heuristic: it bets that low-proliferation types expand next. Where the next- step's composition change does not go that way, every ranked metric gets worse (mech_split zero-development control).-- Within-type selection pushes the sample towards OXPHOS-high / late-pseudotime cells; on patched X3 this part was- −2.4 points (MMD −1.8) on top of the composition (mech_split §3).-- Real cells only: no new expression states, no new cell types.+Test run only.diff --git a/solution/README.md b/solution/README.mddeleted file mode 100644index 7d4b398..0000000--- a/solution/README.md+++ /dev/null@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@-# composition_trend--r1-A 冠军(run 20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-A-era 节点 33,官网 50.1)的组成部分:按类型平均增殖分数重加权类型配额(增殖低的类型占比升高),型内按代谢成熟度(OXPHOS − 糖酵解)分 5 层、再按扩散伪时间偏向更“承诺”的细胞,加权无放回抽取最新输入阶段的真实细胞。表达不改;去掉了 A_EXT(读 manifest `source` 的视图身份分支)和所有环境变量开关。-纯 CPU,final 约 75 s、峰值内存约 7.3 GB(2 线程)。准入记录:`agent/seeds/T1__val/ADMISSION_2026-10-03_composition_trend.md`。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pyindex dbddc68..ac87cb6 100644--- a/solution/run.py+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -1,31 +1,13 @@ #!/usr/bin/env python3-"""composition_trend: type-level composition reweighting + within-type maturity selection of real cells (seed).+"""fake-3: heart_jcf_peri weights perturbed by the fake Engineer (test run).""" -Derived from agent-produced node 33 of run 20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-A-era (commit 10400ee, official T1:val-50.1); METHOD.md has the provenance and what was removed. Expression is never changed: the output is a weighted,-stratified sample of the latest input stage's cells.-- type layer w_t = exp(A_TP * z(mean z_prolif over the type's cells)) A_TP = -0.55- cell layer w_i = exp(A_CM * z_met_i + A_FATE * z_fate_i) A_CM = 1.2, A_FATE = 0.6- z_met = z(mean OXPHOS - mean glycolysis), z_fate = within-type centred diffusion pseudotime- sampling per-type quota by weight sum (largest remainder, capped by type size, overflow re-apportioned);- inside a type K = 5 equal-frequency z_met strata, stratum quota by weight sum, Efraimidis-Spirakis- weighted sampling without replacement inside a stratum.- n the latest stage's cell count clipped to [min_cells, max_cells] (as copy_last).----ablate (G39.7): type_layer | cell_layer (maturity, fate) | anything else = both layers off (uniform weights).--Same code path on every view: the latest input stage by time; the program reads no manifest identity field-(mode / source / board / dataset), no file or directory name, no absolute stage time, no external dataset.-Deterministic for a given --seed. CPU only.-""" from __future__ import annotations import argparse -import numpy as np-+from src.task1_temporal.reweight import heart_reweight from src.task1_temporal.view_io import (+ inputs_by_time, labels_of, load_manifest, panel_genes,@@ -34,174 +16,24 @@ from src.task1_temporal.view_io import ( write_prediction, ) -A_TP = -0.55 # type layer: lower mean proliferation -> larger share-A_CM = 1.2 # cell layer: metabolic maturity (OXPHOS - glycolysis)-A_FATE = 0.6 # cell layer: within-type diffusion pseudotime (more committed cells)-K_STRAT = 5 # z_met strata per type-MIN_TYPE_CELLS = 5--CYCLE = [- "Mki67", "Top2a", "Pcna", "Ccna2", "Ccnb1", "Ccnb2", "Ccnd1", "Ccneg", "Ccne1",- "Cdk1", "Cdk2", "Cdk4", "Cdk6", "Mcm2", "Mcm3", "Mcm4", "Mcm5", "Mcm6", "Mcm7",- "Orc1", "Cdc6", "Cdt1", "Rrm1", "Rrm2", "Tyms", "Dtl", "Cenpf", "Cenpe",- "Birc5", "Aurkb", "Plk1", "Kif20a", "Kif11", "Nusap1",-]-OXPHOS = [- "Ndufa4", "Ndufb8", "Uqcrb", "Uqcrc1", "Cox5a", "Cox6b1", "Cox7a2", "Atp5a1",- "Atp5b", "Atp5f1b", "Atp5pb", "Sdha", "Sdhb",-]-GLYC = ["Slc2a1", "Slc2a3", "Hk1", "Hk2", "Pfkp", "Pgk1", "Pgam1", "Eno1", "Ldha", "Pkma"]---def group_score(X, genes, names):- index = {g: i for i, g in enumerate(genes)}- cols = [index[g] for g in names if g in index]- if not cols:- return np.zeros(X.shape[0], dtype=np.float64)- return np.asarray(X[:, cols].mean(axis=1), dtype=np.float64).ravel()---def zscore(x):- m, s = x.mean(), x.std()- if not np.isfinite(s) or s < 1e-9:- return np.zeros_like(x)- return np.clip((x - m) / s, -3.0, 3.0)---def fate_pseudotime(adata, z_prolif, z_met, seed):- """Diffusion pseudotime rooted at the most progenitor-like cell (argmax 2 z_prolif - z_met, first index wins)."""- import anndata as ad- import scanpy as sc-- tmp = ad.AnnData(X=np.asarray(adata.X.todense(), dtype=np.float32), obs=adata.obs.copy())- sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(tmp, n_top_genes=2000)- tmp = tmp[:, tmp.var["highly_variable"]].copy()- sc.pp.pca(tmp, n_comps=30, random_state=seed)- sc.pp.neighbors(tmp, n_neighbors=30, random_state=seed)- root = int(np.argmax(2.0 * z_prolif - z_met))- tmp.uns["iroot"] = root- sc.tl.diffmap(tmp, n_comps=15, random_state=seed)- tmp.uns["iroot"] = root- sc.tl.dpt(tmp, n_branchings=0)- return np.asarray(tmp.obs["dpt_pseudotime"], dtype=np.float64)---def apportion(wsum, caps, n):- """Largest-remainder apportionment of n proportional to wsum, capped by caps, overflow redistributed."""- alloc = np.zeros(len(wsum), dtype=np.int64)- rem = int(n)- for _ in range(len(wsum) + 5):- if rem <= 0:- break- room = caps - alloc- act = room > 0- if not act.any():- break- tot = float(wsum[act].sum())- target = np.zeros(len(wsum))- if tot > 0:- target[act] = rem * wsum[act] / tot- else:- target[act] = rem / float(act.sum())- add = np.minimum(np.floor(target).astype(np.int64), room)- if add.sum() == 0:- cand = np.where(act)[0]- cand = cand[np.argsort(-target[cand], kind="stable")][:rem]- add = np.zeros(len(wsum), dtype=np.int64)- add[cand] = 1- add = np.minimum(add, room)- alloc += add- rem -= int(add.sum())- return alloc---def es_sample(rows, w, q, rng):- """Efraimidis-Spirakis weighted sample without replacement."""- if q <= 0 or len(rows) == 0:- return np.empty(0, dtype=np.int64)- if q >= len(rows):- return rows- u = rng.random(len(rows))- keys = np.log(np.maximum(u, 1e-300)) / np.maximum(w[rows], 1e-12)- return rows[np.argpartition(-keys, q - 1)[:q]]---def stratified_sample(w, z_strat, inv, n_types, n_out, K, rng):- total = len(w)- if n_out >= total:- return np.arange(total)- counts = np.bincount(inv, minlength=n_types)- n_t = apportion(np.bincount(inv, weights=w, minlength=n_types), counts, n_out)- out = []- for t in range(n_types):- nt = int(n_t[t])- if nt <= 0:- continue- rows = np.where(inv == t)[0]- if nt >= len(rows) or K < 2 or len(rows) < 2 * K:- out.append(es_sample(rows, w, nt, rng))- continue- srows = rows[np.argsort(z_strat[rows], kind="stable")]- base, extra = divmod(len(srows), K)- pos, bounds = 0, []- for k in range(K):- sz = base + (1 if k < extra else 0)- bounds.append(srows[pos:pos + sz])- pos += sz- sizes = np.array([len(b) for b in bounds], dtype=np.int64)- q = apportion(np.array([w[b].sum() for b in bounds]), sizes, nt)- for k in range(K):- if q[k] > 0:- out.append(es_sample(bounds[k], w, int(q[k]), rng))- return np.sort(np.concatenate(out)) if out else np.empty(0, dtype=np.int64)+HEART_WEIGHT = 1.5+EDGE_WEIGHT = 0.15+N_CELLS = 4000 def main() -> None:- ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()- ap.add_argument("--data", required=True)- ap.add_argument("--out", required=True)- ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)- # G39.7 mechanism-off control: type_layer -> A_TP = 0; cell_layer (or maturity / fate) -> A_CM = A_FATE = 0; any other- # name -> both layers off (uniform weights: a stratified copy of the latest stage)- ap.add_argument("--ablate", default=None)- args = ap.parse_args()-+ parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()+ parser.add_argument("--data", required=True)+ parser.add_argument("--out", required=True)+ parser.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)+ args = parser.parse_args() manifest = load_manifest(args.data) genes = panel_genes(args.data, manifest)- last = sorted(manifest["inputs"], key=lambda e: float(e["time"]))[-1] # every input stage treated alike- adata = read_stage(args.data, last, genes, missing="fill")- X = adata.X- labels = labels_of(adata) if "celltype" in adata.obs.columns else np.full(adata.n_obs, "all")-- z_prolif = zscore(group_score(X, genes, CYCLE))- z_met = zscore(group_score(X, genes, OXPHOS) - group_score(X, genes, GLYC))- uniq, inv = np.unique(labels, return_inverse=True)- counts = np.bincount(inv, minlength=len(uniq))-- def tmean(x):- return np.bincount(inv, weights=x, minlength=len(uniq)) / np.maximum(counts, 1)-- z_prolif_t = zscore(tmean(z_prolif))- raw = zscore(fate_pseudotime(adata, z_prolif, z_met, args.seed))- raw = raw - tmean(raw)[inv] # only the within-type order matters- z_fate = zscore(raw)-- a_tp, a_cm, a_fate = A_TP, A_CM, A_FATE- if args.ablate:- if args.ablate in ("type_layer", "type"):- a_tp = 0.0- elif args.ablate in ("cell_layer", "cell", "maturity", "fate"):- a_cm = a_fate = 0.0- else:- a_tp = a_cm = a_fate = 0.0- w_type = np.exp(a_tp * z_prolif_t)- w_type[counts < MIN_TYPE_CELLS] = 1.0- w = np.clip(w_type[inv] * np.exp(a_cm * z_met + a_fate * z_fate), 1e-6, 1e6)-- n_out = target_n_cells(manifest, adata.n_obs)- rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)- idx = stratified_sample(w, z_met, inv, len(uniq), n_out, K_STRAT, rng)- write_prediction(X[idx], genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+ last = read_stage(args.data, inputs_by_time(manifest)[-1], genes)+ pass+ n = target_n_cells(manifest, N_CELLS)+ X = heart_reweight(last.X, labels_of(last), n_cells=n, heart_weight=HEART_WEIGHT, edge_weight=EDGE_WEIGHT, seed=args.seed)+ write_prediction(X, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed) if __name__ == "__main__":
调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。
用到的知识库条目
| 编号 | 标题 | 出处 |
|---|---|---|
| k020 | Correcting sampling-scope (dissection) bias in composition | notes/guides/modeling_and_evaluation_guide.html |
| k036 | Composition forecasting and mixture models for population prediction | notes/competition/05_lineage_graph.md; notes/competition/09_t1_census_lineage.md; 10.1038/s41586-024-08453-2 (growth rates) |
| k015 | Composition x conditional-expression decomposition p(x|t) = sum_z p(z|t) p(x|z,t) | notes/handover/03_当前方案与Agent系统设计.md |
计划里引用的来源
- fake relay: tool protocol exercised
分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。
| 改了什么 | fake relay analysis |
|---|---|
| 假设是否成立 | unclear |
| 经验 |
|
| 下一步建议 |
|
对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。
只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。
分析员
| 角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。 | 分析员 vec-relay-claude-cli/claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。 | 1 |
| 工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | — |
| token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。 | 输入 5,438 · 输出 48 · 思考 0 |
| 任务(第一行) | 分析节点 n3 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | {"changed": "fake relay analysis", "effect_by_group": {}, "hypothesis_supported": "unclear", "failure_reason": null, "lessons": ["fake"], "next_suggestions": ["fake"], "mechanism_active": null} |
| 原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/test/20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake/nodes/3/analyst.jsonl 1 KB |
工程师
| 角色 | 工程师 fake |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 1 |
| 工具调用 | 共 6 次:bash 6 |
| 用时 | 不到 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 54 · 输出 13 · 思考 0 |
| 任务(第一行) | 按计划修改程序:relay-plan-3 |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | wrote solution/run.py with heart x1.5, edge x0.15 (ok) |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/test/20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake/nodes/3/engineer.jsonl 4 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/test/20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake/nodes/3/engineer.stderr |
调研员
| 角色 | 调研员 vec-relay-claude-cli/claude-opus-5-5 |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 2 |
| 工具调用 | 共 2 次:bash 2 |
| 用时 | 不到 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 17,671 · 输出 146 · 思考 0 |
| 任务(第一行) | 为节点 n3(改进,父节点 n2)写改进计划 PLAN.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | {"name": "relay-plan-3", "motivation": "test node 3 through the fake relay. E10.5 心脏中心肌占 28%(FAKE_MEASURED)。", "approach": "perturb the heart / edge weights of the parent's reweighting", "expected_groups": ["cell_state"], "risks": "none (fake)", "family_id": "other", "mechanism": "fake: weight perturbation", "vs_constant_shift": "fake: reweights cells, no shift", "mechanism_evidence": "fake: output differs", "mechanism_off_control": "fake: weights 1.0 reproduce the parent", "sources": ["fake relay: tool protocol exercised"]} |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/test/20261003-151511-search-t1-integration-fake/nodes/3/researcher.jsonl 2 KB |