总览 · ← 返回运行 20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2
节点 n4
括号真实细胞按 t 混抽(坐标原样)+ 共有细胞类型的类型特异加性表达位移(无全局回退),f=0 关闭机制退化为纯 mix。
| 运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。 | 20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2 |
|---|---|
| 父节点 | n1 |
| 子节点 | n6、n7 |
| 操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。 | 改进 |
| 状态 | 已打分 |
| 分数 | 搜索目标分 59.01(+10.3) · proxy 59.01(+10.3) · 3 次复测均分 58.86 |
| 审查 | 未审查 |
| 用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。 | 13 分 |
| 程序版本 | 184446411c07a149fa59bcb04fc572aaa5c81143 (programs.git) |
方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。
来自 programs.git 184446411c:solution/METHOD.md
括号真实细胞按 t 混抽(坐标原样)+ 共有细胞类型的类型特异加性表达位移(无全局回退),f=0 关闭机制退化为纯 mix。
方法(family T2HI-01:type-specific expression interpolation)
interp_bracket从 manifest 取目标两侧的输入 (a, b, t),t = (target − t_a)/(t_b − t_a)(只用时间差,视图无关)。- 细胞数 n = log 线性插值夹到 [min_cells, max_cells](proxy 上 = 17,616)。
mix_indices按 (1−t, t) 从两侧分层(按 celltype)无放回混抽真实细胞,坐标原样保留。- 机制:对两括号中都有 ≥30 个细胞的类型 k(proxy 上为 5 个共有类型), delta_k = mean_b[k] − mean_a[k](log 空间,按抽样行计算);a 侧 k 型细胞 +t·delta_k, b 侧 k 型细胞 −(1−t)·delta_k,使每个共有类型的伪批量落到线性插值点。 非共有类型(a 侧 28 个、b 侧 17 个)不位移(FALLBACK=none,见下)。
- 单输入 / 目标不被括号夹住:退化为 copy_last(分层抽 anchor 阶段)。
- 开关:环境变量 T2HI_SHIFT(默认 1.0;0 = 关闭机制)、T2HI_MODE(add/mult)、 T2HI_FALLBACK(none/global)、T2HI_MASK(all/nonzero)。提交默认 add + none + all + 1.0。
对照与查分(proxy A 半,seed 0,6 次查询)
| 配置 | 总分 | 表达 | 状态 | 形状 | 邻域 | de_score | variogram |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 父节点 copy_last | 48.68 | 44.3 | 51.3 | 49.4 | 49.8 | −0.404 | 0.054 |
| 机制关(SHIFT=0,纯 mix) | 58.90 | 63.8 | 65.9 | 53.3 | 52.6 | 0.326 | 0.0275 |
| 机制开(提交默认,add+fb-none) | 58.59 | 65.0 | 63.8 | 53.3 | 52.3 | 0.359 | 0.0329 |
| add + 全局回退(28 类型也位移) | 53.55 | 65.5 | 49.8 | 51.0 | 47.9 | 0.380 | 0.0773 |
| mult(线性空间乘性,保零) | 58.53 | 63.5 | 65.8 | 53.3 | 51.6 | 0.315 | 0.0274 |
| add + 只移非零元 | 58.75 | 63.8 | 66.0 | 53.3 | 52.0 | 0.326 | 0.0274 |
机制生效的证据
- 位移只作用于 5 个共有类型(约 3.5k/17.6k 个细胞),实际改变了这些细胞的 500 个基因值; 四组分变化:表达 63.8→65.0(de_score 0.326→0.359,de_direction 0.519→0.541,方向正确), 状态 65.9→63.8(variogram 0.0275→0.0329,零位抬高破坏共变),形状不变(坐标未动), 邻域 52.6→52.3(表达-位置配对轻微失配)。
- 对照(SHIFT=0)恢复纯 mix 的全部指标,符合预期;与 PLAN 不同点是基座为 mix 而非 copy_last (copy_last 基座 + 加性位移即 add 全局回退一行的近似,已验证大幅劣化)。
结论与已知弱点
- 机制在 DE 上真实有效(+1.2 表达组分),但等量地损害 variogram/邻域,总分 58.59 与纯 mix 58.90 的差在噪声(~1 分)内;相对父节点 copy_last 48.68 是明确改进(+9.9)。
- 全局回退位移(把 28 个 a-独有类型也推向全局差)确定有害(−5.4),不要再用。
- mult 保零但不改 DE 排序(mix 的伪批量已在插值点附近),无收益。
- 未验证:不同 t / 括号(final 视图 3 输入时 bracket 由时间差决定,代码路径相同); SHIFT∈(0,1) 的细扫(预期在 58.6–58.9 之间,噪声内)。
- 生物学知识来源:仅使用视图内两个已发布括号阶段的实测差值,无外部/文献先验。
调研员的计划
| 名称 | type-specific expression interpolation on copy_last (heart interp) |
|---|---|
| 动机 | Parent node 1 scores 48.68 with expression_change 44.26 (de_score skill 0.414, de_direction skill 0.472, both below floor 0.5). The negative DE arises because copy_last predicts zero real change; sampling noise then registers as anti-correlated spurious change. Node 2 (mix) shows expression_change can reach 63.90 by incorporating the upper bracket's expression signal. Applying a targeted, type-specific expression shift from the two brackets should recover DE scores while preserving spatial structure (coordinates unchanged). |
| 做法 | 1) Load both input stages from the manifest (lower bracket E8.25_late and upper bracket, likely E9.5). 2) Determine interpolation fraction f = (target_time - lower_time) / (upper_time - lower_time) from manifest metadata; if unavailable, default f = 0.25 (E8.5 target between E8.25 and E9.5). 3) For each cell type present in BOTH stages, compute per-gene mean expression difference delta_g = mean_upper[type,g] - mean_lower[type,g]. 4) For each cell in the lower stage, add f * delta_g[cell_type, :] to its expression vector; clip negatives to 0. Cells whose type is absent from the upper bracket remain unshifted. 5) Keep coordinates from E8.25_late unchanged. 6) Stratified sample by cell type to max_cells (same as parent). 7) Single-stage fallback: if only one input stage exists, output it unchanged (degenerates to copy_last). 8) Quick validation: run vec-score once; confirm de_score and de_direction raw values become positive and expression_change group exceeds 50. Then full run. Total runtime should be < 30 s. |
| 风险 | 1) If the upper bracket has very few cells per type, per-type means are noisy and the shift may be poorly estimated; Engineer should check that each shared type has >= 30 cells in both stages, else fall back to global per-gene mean shift. 2) If the interpolation fraction is wrong (e.g., target is not E8.5), the shift magnitude is off; however DE metrics are rank-based so direction matters more than magnitude. 3) Shifting expression without moving coordinates could slightly degrade neighborhood_mmd if the shift creates expression-position mismatch; monitor local_spatial group. 4) If expression_change improves but cell_state drops (mmd_u worsens because shifted cells leave the lower-stage distribution), reduce f. Engineer should check all four groups after first vec-score query. |
代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。
对比:父节点版本 6b309b4ac0。改动的文件:solution/EXECUTION.json +1 −0、solution/METHOD.md +44 −0、solution/README.md +0 −4、solution/run.py +111 −15
diff --git a/solution/EXECUTION.json b/solution/EXECUTION.jsonnew file mode 100644index 0000000..6d8012e--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/EXECUTION.json@@ -0,0 +1 @@+{"gpu": false}\ No newline at end of filediff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..91a6e1a--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@+括号真实细胞按 t 混抽(坐标原样)+ 共有细胞类型的类型特异加性表达位移(无全局回退),f=0 关闭机制退化为纯 mix。++# 方法(family T2HI-01:type-specific expression interpolation)++1. `interp_bracket` 从 manifest 取目标两侧的输入 (a, b, t),t = (target − t_a)/(t_b − t_a)(只用时间差,视图无关)。+2. 细胞数 n = log 线性插值夹到 [min_cells, max_cells](proxy 上 = 17,616)。+3. `mix_indices` 按 (1−t, t) 从两侧分层(按 celltype)无放回混抽真实细胞,坐标原样保留。+4. **机制**:对两括号中都有 ≥30 个细胞的类型 k(proxy 上为 5 个共有类型),+ delta_k = mean_b[k] − mean_a[k](log 空间,按抽样行计算);a 侧 k 型细胞 +t·delta_k,+ b 侧 k 型细胞 −(1−t)·delta_k,使每个共有类型的伪批量落到线性插值点。+ 非共有类型(a 侧 28 个、b 侧 17 个)**不位移**(FALLBACK=none,见下)。+5. 单输入 / 目标不被括号夹住:退化为 copy_last(分层抽 anchor 阶段)。+6. 开关:环境变量 T2HI_SHIFT(默认 1.0;0 = 关闭机制)、T2HI_MODE(add/mult)、+ T2HI_FALLBACK(none/global)、T2HI_MASK(all/nonzero)。提交默认 add + none + all + 1.0。++# 对照与查分(proxy A 半,seed 0,6 次查询)++| 配置 | 总分 | 表达 | 状态 | 形状 | 邻域 | de_score | variogram |+|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|+| 父节点 copy_last | 48.68 | 44.3 | 51.3 | 49.4 | 49.8 | −0.404 | 0.054 |+| 机制关(SHIFT=0,纯 mix) | 58.90 | 63.8 | 65.9 | 53.3 | 52.6 | 0.326 | 0.0275 |+| **机制开(提交默认,add+fb-none)** | **58.59** | **65.0** | 63.8 | 53.3 | 52.3 | **0.359** | 0.0329 |+| add + 全局回退(28 类型也位移) | 53.55 | 65.5 | 49.8 | 51.0 | 47.9 | 0.380 | 0.0773 |+| mult(线性空间乘性,保零) | 58.53 | 63.5 | 65.8 | 53.3 | 51.6 | 0.315 | 0.0274 |+| add + 只移非零元 | 58.75 | 63.8 | 66.0 | 53.3 | 52.0 | 0.326 | 0.0274 |++## 机制生效的证据++- 位移只作用于 5 个共有类型(约 3.5k/17.6k 个细胞),实际改变了这些细胞的 500 个基因值;+ 四组分变化:表达 63.8→65.0(de_score 0.326→0.359,de_direction 0.519→0.541,方向正确),+ 状态 65.9→63.8(variogram 0.0275→0.0329,零位抬高破坏共变),形状不变(坐标未动),+ 邻域 52.6→52.3(表达-位置配对轻微失配)。+- 对照(SHIFT=0)恢复纯 mix 的全部指标,符合预期;与 PLAN 不同点是基座为 mix 而非 copy_last+ (copy_last 基座 + 加性位移即 add 全局回退一行的近似,已验证大幅劣化)。++## 结论与已知弱点++- 机制在 DE 上真实有效(+1.2 表达组分),但等量地损害 variogram/邻域,总分 58.59 与纯 mix+ 58.90 的差在噪声(~1 分)内;相对父节点 copy_last 48.68 是明确改进(+9.9)。+- 全局回退位移(把 28 个 a-独有类型也推向全局差)确定有害(−5.4),不要再用。+- mult 保零但不改 DE 排序(mix 的伪批量已在插值点附近),无收益。+- 未验证:不同 t / 括号(final 视图 3 输入时 bracket 由时间差决定,代码路径相同);+ SHIFT∈(0,1) 的细扫(预期在 58.6–58.9 之间,噪声内)。+- 生物学知识来源:仅使用视图内两个已发布括号阶段的实测差值,无外部/文献先验。diff --git a/solution/README.md b/solution/README.mddeleted file mode 100644index 49dbaae..0000000--- a/solution/README.md+++ /dev/null@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@-# copy_last(T2:heart:val_interp)--输出目标之前最近的输入阶段(proxy 与 final 都是 E8.25_late),表达和坐标原样。E8.25_late 有 58,716 个细胞,超过榜上限 17,616,按细胞类型分层无放回抽到上限。-proxy 预期 ≈ 48.6(seed 0 实测 48.64;表达 44.1 / 状态 51.4 / 形状 49.4 / 邻域 49.6)。低于地板 50 的原因:地板是整份参考阶段本身,de_score 恰为 0;抽样后的子集相对参考阶段有抽样噪声造成的假差异(`_de_raw` 0.196),de_score 变负。合规上限迫使抽样,所以这是合法 copy_last 的实际地板。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pyindex 0595dc9..76e3c3b 100644--- a/solution/run.py+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -1,20 +1,51 @@ #!/usr/bin/env python3-"""copy_last (T2): the latest input at or before the target, with its own coordinates.+"""Type-specific expression interpolation on a real-cell bracket mix (T2 heart interp). -Interpolation boards take the lower bracket stage, extrapolation boards the-last input; this is the floor's reference stage on the proxy. Cells are drawn-stratified by cell type only when the stage exceeds the board's max_cells.-Expression and coordinates are unchanged.+Base: stratified mix of real cells from the two bracket stages at fraction+t = (target - t_a) / (t_b - t_a), coordinates kept as measured (family of the+`mix` seed). Mechanism (PLAN T2HI-01): every sampled cell additionally gets a+per-cell-type, per-gene shift derived from the observed bracket difference+delta_k = mean_b[k] - mean_a[k]; cells from the lower bracket move +t*delta_k,+cells from the upper bracket move -(1-t)*delta_k, so each type's pseudobulk+lands at the interpolated state. Types with too few cells in either bracket+fall back to the global (all-cell) bracket difference; types missing from one+bracket are not shifted.++Mechanism off: env T2HI_SHIFT=0 disables the shift and yields the plain mix.+Single input stage / unbracketed target: degenerates to copy_last. """ from __future__ import annotations import argparse+import os import numpy as np -from src.task2_spatial.sample import take-from src.task2_spatial.view_io import anchor_entry, load_manifest, panel_genes, read_stage, write_t2+from src.task2_spatial.sample import interp_count, mix_indices, take+from src.task2_spatial.view_io import (+ anchor_entry,+ interp_bracket,+ load_manifest,+ panel_genes,+ read_stage,+ write_t2,+)++SHIFT = float(os.environ.get("T2HI_SHIFT", "1.0"))+MODE = os.environ.get("T2HI_MODE", "add")+FALLBACK = os.environ.get("T2HI_FALLBACK", "none") # "global" or "none"+MIN_TYPE_CELLS = int(os.environ.get("T2HI_MIN_TYPE_CELLS", "30"))+++def _copy_anchor(view, manifest, genes, rng, out, seed):+ stage = read_stage(view, anchor_entry(manifest), genes)+ n = int(np.clip(stage.n, manifest["min_cells"], manifest["max_cells"]))+ if n <= stage.n:+ rows = np.sort(take(stage.labels, n, rng))+ else:+ rows = np.sort(rng.choice(stage.n, size=n, replace=True))+ write_t2(out, stage.X[rows].toarray(), stage.coords[rows], genes, seed=seed) def main() -> None:@@ -24,16 +55,81 @@ def main() -> None: parser.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0) args = parser.parse_args() + rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed) manifest = load_manifest(args.data) genes = panel_genes(args.data, manifest)- stage = read_stage(args.data, anchor_entry(manifest), genes)- n = int(np.clip(stage.n, manifest["min_cells"], manifest["max_cells"]))- rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)- if n <= stage.n:- rows = np.sort(take(stage.labels, n, rng))- else: # fewer cells than min_cells: resample with replacement- rows = np.sort(rng.choice(stage.n, size=n, replace=True))- write_t2(args.out, stage.X[rows].toarray(), stage.coords[rows], genes, seed=args.seed)+ a_entry, b_entry, t = interp_bracket(manifest)+ if b_entry is None or t is None:+ _copy_anchor(args.data, manifest, genes, rng, args.out, args.seed)+ return++ A = read_stage(args.data, a_entry, genes)+ B = read_stage(args.data, b_entry, genes)+ lo, hi = int(manifest["min_cells"]), int(manifest["max_cells"])+ n = interp_count(A.n, B.n, t, lo, hi)+ rows_a, rows_b = mix_indices(A.labels, B.labels, t, n, rng)++ Xa = np.asarray(A.X[rows_a].todense(), dtype=np.float32)+ Xb = np.asarray(B.X[rows_b].todense(), dtype=np.float32)+ coords = np.vstack([A.coords[rows_a], B.coords[rows_b]])+ lab_a = np.asarray(A.labels)[rows_a].astype(str)+ lab_b = np.asarray(B.labels)[rows_b].astype(str)++ if SHIFT > 0.0 and Xa.shape[0] > 0 and Xb.shape[0] > 0:+ idx_a = {k: np.flatnonzero(lab_a == k) for k in set(lab_a)}+ idx_b = {k: np.flatnonzero(lab_b == k) for k in set(lab_b)}+ if MODE == "add":+ global_delta = Xb.mean(0) - Xa.mean(0) if FALLBACK == "global" else np.zeros(Xa.shape[1], np.float32)+ deltas: dict[str, np.ndarray] = {}+ for k in set(lab_a) | set(lab_b):+ ia, ib = idx_a.get(k), idx_b.get(k)+ if ia is not None and ib is not None and len(ia) >= MIN_TYPE_CELLS and len(ib) >= MIN_TYPE_CELLS:+ deltas[k] = Xb[ib].mean(0) - Xa[ia].mean(0)+ else:+ deltas[k] = global_delta+ mask = os.environ.get("T2HI_MASK", "all") # "all" or "nonzero"+ for k, ia in idx_a.items():+ d = np.float32(t * SHIFT) * deltas[k]+ if mask == "nonzero":+ Xa[ia] += d * (Xa[ia] > 0)+ else:+ Xa[ia] += d+ for k, ib in idx_b.items():+ d = np.float32((1.0 - t) * SHIFT) * deltas[k]+ if mask == "nonzero":+ Xb[ib] -= d * (Xb[ib] > 0)+ else:+ Xb[ib] -= d+ else: # multiplicative in linear space: preserves the zero pattern+ Ea = np.expm1(Xa, dtype=np.float64)+ Eb = np.expm1(Xb, dtype=np.float64)+ eps = 1e-6+ gm_a, gm_b = Ea.mean(0), Eb.mean(0)+ gm_t = (1.0 - t) * gm_a + t * gm_b+ gfac_a = np.clip((gm_t + eps) / (gm_a + eps), 0.05, 20.0)+ gfac_b = np.clip((gm_t + eps) / (gm_b + eps), 0.05, 20.0)+ for k in set(lab_a) | set(lab_b):+ ia, ib = idx_a.get(k), idx_b.get(k)+ if ia is not None and ib is not None and len(ia) >= MIN_TYPE_CELLS and len(ib) >= MIN_TYPE_CELLS:+ m_a = Ea[ia].mean(0)+ m_b = Eb[ib].mean(0)+ m_t = (1.0 - t) * m_a + t * m_b+ fac_a = np.clip((m_t + eps) / (m_a + eps), 0.05, 20.0)+ fac_b = np.clip((m_t + eps) / (m_b + eps), 0.05, 20.0)+ else:+ fac_a, fac_b = gfac_a, gfac_b+ # blend factor toward 1.0 by SHIFT (shift strength damping)+ fac_a = 1.0 + SHIFT * (fac_a - 1.0)+ fac_b = 1.0 + SHIFT * (fac_b - 1.0)+ if ia is not None:+ Ea[ia] *= np.clip(fac_a, 0.0, None)+ if ib is not None:+ Eb[ib] *= np.clip(fac_b, 0.0, None)+ Xa = np.log1p(Ea).astype(np.float32)+ Xb = np.log1p(Eb).astype(np.float32)++ X = np.clip(np.vstack([Xa, Xb]), 0.0, None)+ write_t2(args.out, X, coords, genes, seed=args.seed) if __name__ == "__main__":
调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。
用到的知识库条目
| 编号 | 标题 | 出处 |
|---|---|---|
| k016 | Degenerate-solution checks for population predictions | notes/handover/02_知识学习路线.md |
| k007 | Interval staging and held-out-window filtering of external data | notes/official/来件/virtualembryo.ai/rules.md |
| k023 | Time-split validation with a held-out intermediate or next time point | notes/handover/02_知识学习路线.md |
分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。
| 改了什么 | 把基座从 copy_last 换成括号两侧真实细胞按 t 分层混抽(坐标原样),再对两侧都 >=30 细胞的 5 个共有类型加类型特异 log 空间位移(a 侧 +t*delta_k、b 侧 -(1-t)*delta_k,delta_k = 括号均值差),非共有类型不位移、无全局回退。与 PLAN 的差别:PLAN 设想 copy_last 基座,实际用 mix 基座,因此 +10.33 的大头来自 mix,不是来自位移机制。 |
|---|---|
| 各组分数的变化 | cell_state:变好:51.33→64.53(+13.20)。mmd_u 0.0544→0.0325(得分 +1.56),variogram 0.0535→0.0305(得分 +1.74),主要由 mix 基座带来;消融显示位移机制反而使 variogram 0.0275→0.0329(零位抬高破坏共变),组 65.9→63.8。 expression_change:变好:44.26→65.47(+21.21)。de_score 原始值 -0.404→0.383(得分 +2.62),de_direction -0.119→0.539(得分 +2.68)。据 Engineer 消融,纯 mix 已达 de_score 0.326 / 组 63.8,位移机制只再贡献约 +1.2 组分(在噪声边缘)。 local_spatial:变好:49.75→52.72(+2.97)。neighborhood_mmd 0.0982→0.0873(得分 +0.74),门 =1。消融显示位移机制使其 52.6→52.3(表达-位置轻微失配),机制对该组是小幅负作用。 shape_scale:变好:49.37→53.31(+3.94)。d2_shape 0.0457→0.0395(+0.35 分),occupancy_dice 0.805→0.832(+0.52 分),scale_log_ratio 0.490→0.469(+0.11 分)。坐标未动,收益来自混合两朵真实点云。 |
| family_id | T2HI-01 |
| 假设是否成立 | unclear |
| 经验 |
|
| mechanism_active | 是 |
| 下一步建议 |
|
对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。
只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。
分析员
| 角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。 | 分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。 | 3 |
| 工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。 | 共 3 次:bash 1、read 1、write 1 |
| 用时 | 1 分 |
| token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。 | 输入 16,640 · 输出 1,280 · 思考 1,962 |
| 任务(第一行) | 分析节点 n4 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | ANALYSIS.json written |
| 原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/analyst.jsonl 16 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/analyst.stderr |
工程师
| 角色 | 工程师 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 20 |
| 工具调用 | 共 26 次:bash 16、edit 8、write 2 |
| 用时 | 10 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 49,784 · 输出 8,397 · 思考 11,512 |
| 任务(第一行) | 按计划修改程序:type-specific expression interpolation on copy_last (heart interp) |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | 完成。 **做了什么**:在父节点 copy_last(48.68)基础上实现 PLAN 家族 T2HI-01:按 t=0.4 混抽括号两侧真实细胞(坐标原样),再对 5 个共有细胞类型施加类型特异加性位移(a 侧 +t·delta_k,b 侧 −(1−t)·delta_k),非共有类型不位移、无全局回退。 **查分**(6/20 次,proxy A 半,seed 0):提交配置 58.59;机制关(纯 mix)58.90;全局回退位移 53.55(确定有害);mult 58.53;非零掩码 58.75。机制使 de_score 0.326→0.359、表达组 63.8→65.0,但 variogram 等量受损,总分与纯 mix 差在噪声内;相对父节点 +9.9。确定性、vec-check、默认输出与查分文件逐字节一致均已验证。 **下一步最值得试**:位移的收益被零位抬高的 variogram 损失抵消——值得试"稀疏感知"位移(按目标均值重采样非零模式而非加常数),或在 mix 基座上只对 DE 强基因(|delta| 大)位移;另外邻域组(52)仍低于 mix 家族上限,坐标不动的表达位移天然受此制约。 |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/engineer.jsonl 104 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/engineer.stderr |
调研员
| 角色 | 调研员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 1 |
| 工具调用 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 8,788 · 输出 1,079 · 思考 3,572 |
| 任务(第一行) | 为节点 n4(改进,父节点 n1)写改进计划 PLAN.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | l per-gene mean shift. 2) If the interpolation fraction is wrong (e.g., target is not E8.5), the shift magnitude is off; however DE metrics are rank-based so direction matters more than magnitude. 3) Shifting expression without moving coordinates could slightly degrade neighborhood_mmd if the shift creates expression-position mismatch; monitor local_spatial group. 4) If expression_change improves but cell_state drops (mmd_u worsens because shifted cells leave the lower-stage distribution), reduce f. Engineer should check all four groups after first vec-score query.", "family_id": "T2HI-01", "mechanism": "Per-cell-type, per-gene expression shift derived from the observed temporal difference between the two bracket stages, scaled by the interpolation fraction. This injects the correct direction of gene expression change into the prediction.", "vs_constant_shift": "The shift varies by both gene AND cell type (a different vector per type), derived from actual observed inter-stage differences. A constant shift applies one vector to all cells regardless of type. Here, e.g., cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells receive different shift vectors reflecting their distinct temporal trajectories.", "mechanism_evidence": "1) de_score and de_direction raw values should flip from negative to positive (currently -0.40 and -0.12). 2) Per-type shift vectors should have non-trivial dispersion (std across types > 0.1 for at least 50 genes), confirming type-specificity. 3) expression_change group should rise above 50 while local_spatial stays >= 49. 4) Compare per-gene dp correlation with the bracket-difference direction: Spearman rho(dp, delta) should be significantly positive.", "mechanism_off_control": "Set interpolation fraction f = 0 in the script (one flag or constant). With f = 0, no shift is applied and the output is identical to copy_last (parent node 1). Expected: all eight metrics return to parent values (score ~48.7, expression_change ~44.3).", "sources": [] } ``` |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/researcher.jsonl 5 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-094241-search-t2-heart-interp-g24-D-s2/nodes/4/researcher.stderr |