总览 · ← 返回运行 20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1
节点 n22 在终选来历上
growth_dynamics v2 — METHOD
| 运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。 | 20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1 |
|---|---|
| 父节点 | n19 |
| 子节点 | n24、n25 |
| 操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。 | 改进 |
| 状态 | 已打分 |
| 分数 | 搜索目标分 58.19(+9.3) · X3 57.73(+10.7) · proxy10 59.13(+6.4) · 3 次复测均分 58.16 |
| 审查 | 通过 1 越界读取:未发现问题——run.py 仅通过 src.task1_temporal.view_io 的 load_manifest/panel_genes/inputs_by_time(include_external=True)/read_stage/write_prediction 读写数据(run.py:34,140-154,339),external 均在 view_manifest_X3.json 声明内;无绝对路径、'..'、/mnt、/home、data/raw、downloads、打分器路径,无联网。; 2 硬编码目标统计量:未发现问题——HEART_TYPES/EDGE… |
| 用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。 | 17 分 |
| 程序版本 | f387a23b05f016f2286a2e9394c2d148bc27f86f (programs.git) |
方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。
来自 programs.git f387a23b05:solution/METHOD.md
growth_dynamics v2 — METHOD
组成趋势×簇级OT生长权重重采样+门控型级位移外推;单输入退路=心脏解剖组成先验+型内复杂度选择。
方法(family_id = growth_dynamics)
统一管线:对末阶段每个细胞算权重 w_i = w_type(i) × G_cluster(i)^γ × exp(λ·z_i),
按型做 largest-remainder 配额、型内按 w_i 有放回/不放回抽样(λ=0.15,γ=1.0),输出真实末阶段细胞。
两输入路径(X3):
- 组成趋势:
w_t = c1_t · clip((n1_t+3)/(n0_t+3), 0.2, 5)^T,T = clip(Δt_out/Δt_in, 0, 1.5)(只用时间差;X3 上 T=1.5)。 - 生长权重(机制):HVG2500+PCA25 上非平衡 Sinkhorn OT(reg=0.05,reg_m=0.3 固定,跳过父节点自适应),源边际失衡 → 逐源细胞 g_i(clip [0.4,2.5])→ 5-NN 传到末阶段全部细胞 → KMeans(20, random_state=seed) 聚类 → 逐簇中位数 G_c(PLAN 的 Leiden 换成 KMeans:更快且严格确定,见"偏差")。
final = trend × G_c^γ。 - 型内成熟度倾斜:细胞在型级伪批量差方向(mean_last − mean_first,覆盖基因)上的投影,型内 z 分数,×exp(0.15·z)。
- 位移:型级伪批量差 × β·T(β=1.0),稀疏门控(只加在该细胞已表达基因上,父节点教训),clip ≥0;非覆盖基因不动。
单输入路径(proxy10):生长不可辨识(无 OT)。组成 = 心脏解剖先验重加权(HEART_TYPES ×1.6,Surface Ectoderm/EXEM/Paraxial Mesoderm ×0.25,Neural Tube 剔除;同 src/task1_temporal/reweight.py 的 run2 验证规则);型内选择 = 细胞复杂度(log 总 counts)z 分数倾斜 λ=0.15。无位移。不再用父节点的 copy_last 退路。
机制生效证据(X3,seed 0,A 半)
- 簇级 G_c:std=0.052(≥0.05 阈值),range [0.475, 0.642];KMeans 20 簇的中位数聚合比父节点 NN 平滑(std 0.047)对比度略升。reg_m 从父节点的 1.0 降到 0.3 提高了源级 g 对比度。
- growth-on vs growth-off(GROWTH_OFF=1,同一程序同一 seed,其余全同):
- on:58.90(de_score 14.89 / de_dir 13.48 / mmd_u 0.0214→20.27 / variogram 0.001474→10.26)
- off:57.69(14.56 / 13.63 / 0.02227→19.79 / 0.001619→9.72)
- 差 +1.21,在 ±2 噪声内 → 机制弱活性:方向为正,主要落在 mmd_u(+0.48)和 variogram(+0.55),但不可辨识为确定收益。如实报告。
- γ=2.0(加强生长):56.82,比 γ=1.0 差 → 对比度加强反而放大噪声,保持 γ=1.0。
- 位移门控是关键:β·T=1.5 稠密位移 variogram 崩到 3.47(总 49.75),门控后 10.26(总 58.90)——与父节点"稀疏门控保护共变结构"的教训一致。
查分记录(A 半,seed 0)
| 配置 | X3 | proxy10 |
|---|---|---|
| 父节点 19 | 47.03 | 52.75 |
| v1 稠密位移 γ=1 | 49.75 | — |
| 提交:门控位移 γ=1 growth-on | 58.90 | — |
| 门控 growth-off(对照) | 57.69 | — |
| 门控 γ=2 | 56.82 | — |
| 单输入:prolif 倾斜 λ=0.15 | — | 58.15 |
| 提交:complexity 倾斜 λ=0.15 | — | 58.79 |
| complexity λ=0.5 | — | 54.43 |
| HEART_WEIGHT 2.2 / EDGE 0.2 | — | 58.55 |
节点分估计 = (58.79 + 2×58.90)/3 ≈ 58.9(父 48.94)。
偏差与未验证
- PLAN 的 Leiden 聚类换成 KMeans(k=20):确定性更强、无 igraph 依赖、X3 2174 细胞下快;聚类目的(G_c 去噪聚合)等价。
- 未验证:reg_m<0.3、簇数扫描、λ 在两输入路径上的扫描、β<1.0、单输入 prolif vs complexity 在 B 半的表现(A 半差 0.64,噪声内,选了 mmd 更好的 complexity)。
- 单输入路径(58.8)仍低于节点 3/7 的 63.7/64.3:其"型内成熟度选择"具体实现不可见,本次用心脏先验+复杂度倾斜逼近,未完全恢复。
确定性 / 视图无关
np.random.default_rng(seed)、KMeans(random_state=seed)、randomized_svd(random_state=seed);无全局随机态。只用时间差(Δt_out/Δt_in)与视图内数据;不读 external/、不读绝对阶段名分支。两视图 vec-check 通过;X3 全程 <20s,proxy <5s,纯 CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。
知识来源
- 心脏解剖先验(心脏侧类型上调、表面/边缘类型下调、Neural Tube 剔除):E9.5 心脏解剖取样的通用谱系知识,与 src reweight.py(run2 已验证)一致,不含保留阶段测量。
- 增殖基因列表:GO:0007049(细胞周期)通用注释(最终配置未使用,保留在代码里作 TILT_MODE=prolif 分支)。
- 非平衡 OT 生长权重 = 边际失衡:Waddington-OT 生长项的标准做法(Séjourné et al. Sinkhorn divergences 框架)。
调研员的计划
| 名称 | growth_dynamics v2: 型级聚合生长权重+组成趋势融合+单输入继承组成重加权 |
|---|---|
| 动机 | 父节点19最大损失在proxy10(-10.92),完全因单输入退路为copy_last,丢掉了节点3/7/13/16已验证的组成重加权收益(proxy10 63.66→52.75)。X3上生长权重对比度不足(NN平滑后std 0.047<0.05),growth-on vs off在±2噪声内(47.16 vs 47.41),机制惰性。两项结构问题需同时修复。 |
| 做法 | 步骤1(单输入路径,保proxy10):实现与节点7/13/16相同的组成重加权+型内成熟度选择作为单输入退路(不再用copy_last)。具体:Leiden聚类(resolution 0.5-1.0)→型频率趋势外推w_t = c1_t · clip((c1_t+5)/(c0_t+5), 0.2, 5)^T(T clip 1.5,平滑s=3)→按权重有放回重采样真实细胞→型内按z_fate相关表达程序排序选细胞(λ=0.15)。单输入无频率趋势时用均匀采样代替(仍优于copy_last因有型内选择)。步骤2(两输入路径,X3):保留非平衡Sinkhorn OT(reg=0.05),但reg_m直接设0.3(跳过自适应,因父节点已证2.0/1.0对比度不足);关键改动:(a)对末阶段细胞做Leiden聚类(k≈15-25),将逐细胞g_i按簇取中位数得到簇级生长G_c;(b)将G_c与组成趋势权重相乘:final_weight_c = trend_c × (G_c)^γ,γ∈{0.5,1.0,2.0}(初值1.0)控制生长信号强度;(c)按final_weight_c有放回重采样真实末阶段细胞;(d)可选位移:保留父节点稀疏门控残差解码(α=0.6,位移只加已表达基因),但若查分显示α>0伤害variogram则设α=0(纯组成)。步骤3(vec-score筛选):先跑X3 A半,确认(a)组成路径≥节点3的48.71;(b)growth-on vs off差值方向;再跑proxy10 A半。步骤4:若G_c std仍<0.1,试reg_m=0.15或GROWTH_SHARP=4(g→g^4归一化)。单输入退路:只有1个输入阶段时走步骤1的组成重加权。 |
| 风险 | 1) 组成重加权实现与节点7/13/16不一致导致proxy10未恢复到63+:Engineer应对比节点7的proxy10 A半分数确认。2) X3间隔仅0.25天,即使reg_m=0.3,簇级生长对比度仍可能不足(G_c std<0.1):此时γ=0(生长关闭)应等于纯组成趋势,不应比节点3差。3) 30分钟内实现两路径(组成+生长)可能紧张:优先保证单输入组成路径正确(占分数主体),两输入路径可简化为仅用G_c调制重采样概率,不做位移。4) Leiden聚类引入随机性:固定random_state=seed。 |
代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。
对比:父节点版本 7f050577dd。改动的文件:solution/METHOD.md +55 −67、solution/run.py +271 −144
diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdindex 32b3a5a..5d63ab8 100644--- a/solution/METHOD.md+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -1,70 +1,58 @@-growth_dynamics 最小版:两输入阶段做非平衡 Sinkhorn OT,取逐细胞生长权重 g_i(源边际失衡)驱动重采样 + 重心速度 α 外推(残差解码回真实细胞,稀疏门控);单输入退路为 copy_last。--## 方法族与机制--family_id = growth_dynamics(PLAN 指定的最小实现)。机制:非平衡最优传输(POT-`ot.sinkhorn_unbalanced`,reg=0.05)在 25 维 PCA 空间(2500 HVG,两阶段合并拟合,-randomized SVD,random_state=seed)耦合相邻两输入阶段;每个源细胞的耦合行和 /-(1/n) 给出局部生长权重 g_i(clip [0.4,2.5]),重心差给出速度 v_i(范数 clip 到-2×中位数)。(v,g) 经 5-NN 传到末阶段全部细胞;外推 z_pred = z_last + α·v,-α = 0.8·clip(Δt_out/Δt_train, 1, 1.5)(只用时间差,视图无关);输出 N_out 个细胞-按 p ∝ g 有放回重采样(机制关闭时均匀采样);解码为残差式:真实末阶段细胞的稀疏-表达 + PCA 逆投影位移,位移只加在该细胞已表达的基因上(稀疏门控,默认开),-clip ≥0;非 HVG 覆盖基因原样保留。单输入阶段(proxy10)生长不可辨识,退路为-copy_last 均匀子采样。--reg_m 自适应:依次尝试 2.0 → 1.0 → 0.5,取第一个使 std(g_src) ≥ 0.05 的(PLAN-风险 1 的处置);X3 上实际选中 reg_m=1.0。--## 机制生效证据(X3_qiu_heart_early,seed 0,A 半)--- g_i 分布(NN 平滑后):mean 0.845,std 0.047,min 0.705,max 0.928;- 15.4% 细胞 g∉[0.8,1.2]。std > 0.05 在源细胞层面成立(reg_m=1.0 时 g_src- std=0.057),NN 平滑后略降 → 机制活性偏弱。-- 机制改变的内容:只改变被抽样细胞的组成(g 高的亚状态被过采样),不改变表达- 解码路径。生长开 vs 关(同一位移,均匀重采样):- - growth-on:47.16(cell_state 49.19,covariation 48.36,mmd_u 0.03475)- - growth-off:47.41(cell_state 48.89,covariation 48.57)- 差值在 ±2 噪声内 → 生长重采样在 X3 上**惰性到轻微有害**,未产生可测收益。-- 位移外推(α)扫描:α=1.2 无门控 46.16(variogram 42.1,稠密位移破坏共变);- α=1.2 门控 47.16;α=0.6 门控 47.24;α=0(纯生长重采样)47.38;均 ≤ copy_last- 参考 47.92(节点 1)。OT 重心速度方向在 X3 上未带来 mmd/DE 收益。--## 查分记录(A 半)--| 配置 | X3 |-|---|---|-| resid 无门控 α=1.2 growth-on / off | 46.16 / 46.18 |-| resid 无门控 α=0.6 | 46.66 |-| 纯生长重采样 α=0 / sharpen^4 | 47.38 / 44.41 |-| 门控 α=1.2 / α=0.6 | 47.16 / 47.24 |-| 门控 α=1.2 growth-off(对照,提交配置) | 47.41 |--proxy10(copy_last 退路,提交配置):52.97(种子 copy_last 节点 1 为 52.75,-噪声内一致)。--## 验证过 / 未验证--- 验证过:X3 与 proxy 两视图 vec-check 通过;seed 0 下跨 cwd 重跑输出逐位相同- (确定性);只用时间差与视图数据(视图无关);纯 CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false),- X3 全程 <40s、proxy <5s。-- 未验证:α、λ、reg 的系统扫描(时间预算内只做了上述点);blend 解码(实现了- GROWTH_DECODE=blend 但未查分);生长机制在输入间隔更长/细胞更多的视图(如- proxy2、final)上是否更强——X3 两阶段同为 Qiu 心脏细胞、间隔仅 0.25 天,- 生长信号弱。--## 结论与下一步--按 PLAN 要求提交时机制保持打开(growth-on、门控残差解码)。诚实结论:在 X3 上-该机制族的最小版未跑赢 copy_last(≈47.2 vs 47.9,噪声内),瓶颈是 0.25 天间隔-下非平衡 OT 的生长权重对比度太低(std≈0.05),以及重心速度对 mmd 无收益。-下一步最值得试:(1) 把生长权重按细胞类型聚合(去噪)再与组成趋势重加权(节点-7/13/16 已证明有效)组合;(2) 更低 reg_m / KL 权重扫描提高 g 对比度;(3) 在-proxy2(0.5 天间隔、跨数据集)上检验生长信号是否更可辨识。+# growth_dynamics v2 — METHOD++组成趋势×簇级OT生长权重重采样+门控型级位移外推;单输入退路=心脏解剖组成先验+型内复杂度选择。++## 方法(family_id = growth_dynamics)++统一管线:对末阶段每个细胞算权重 `w_i = w_type(i) × G_cluster(i)^γ × exp(λ·z_i)`,+按型做 largest-remainder 配额、型内按 w_i 有放回/不放回抽样(λ=0.15,γ=1.0),输出真实末阶段细胞。++**两输入路径(X3)**:+1. 组成趋势:`w_t = c1_t · clip((n1_t+3)/(n0_t+3), 0.2, 5)^T`,`T = clip(Δt_out/Δt_in, 0, 1.5)`(只用时间差;X3 上 T=1.5)。+2. 生长权重(机制):HVG2500+PCA25 上非平衡 Sinkhorn OT(reg=0.05,**reg_m=0.3 固定**,跳过父节点自适应),源边际失衡 → 逐源细胞 g_i(clip [0.4,2.5])→ 5-NN 传到末阶段全部细胞 → KMeans(20, random_state=seed) 聚类 → 逐簇中位数 G_c(PLAN 的 Leiden 换成 KMeans:更快且严格确定,见"偏差")。`final = trend × G_c^γ`。+3. 型内成熟度倾斜:细胞在型级伪批量差方向(mean_last − mean_first,覆盖基因)上的投影,型内 z 分数,×exp(0.15·z)。+4. 位移:型级伪批量差 × β·T(β=1.0),**稀疏门控**(只加在该细胞已表达基因上,父节点教训),clip ≥0;非覆盖基因不动。++**单输入路径(proxy10)**:生长不可辨识(无 OT)。组成 = 心脏解剖先验重加权(HEART_TYPES ×1.6,Surface Ectoderm/EXEM/Paraxial Mesoderm ×0.25,Neural Tube 剔除;同 src/task1_temporal/reweight.py 的 run2 验证规则);型内选择 = 细胞复杂度(log 总 counts)z 分数倾斜 λ=0.15。无位移。不再用父节点的 copy_last 退路。++## 机制生效证据(X3,seed 0,A 半)++- 簇级 G_c:std=0.052(≥0.05 阈值),range [0.475, 0.642];KMeans 20 簇的中位数聚合比父节点 NN 平滑(std 0.047)对比度略升。reg_m 从父节点的 1.0 降到 0.3 提高了源级 g 对比度。+- growth-on vs growth-off(GROWTH_OFF=1,同一程序同一 seed,其余全同):+ - on:**58.90**(de_score 14.89 / de_dir 13.48 / mmd_u 0.0214→20.27 / variogram 0.001474→10.26)+ - off:**57.69**(14.56 / 13.63 / 0.02227→19.79 / 0.001619→9.72)+ - 差 +1.21,在 ±2 噪声内 → 机制**弱活性**:方向为正,主要落在 mmd_u(+0.48)和 variogram(+0.55),但不可辨识为确定收益。如实报告。+- γ=2.0(加强生长):56.82,比 γ=1.0 差 → 对比度加强反而放大噪声,保持 γ=1.0。+- 位移门控是关键:β·T=1.5 稠密位移 variogram 崩到 3.47(总 49.75),门控后 10.26(总 58.90)——与父节点"稀疏门控保护共变结构"的教训一致。++## 查分记录(A 半,seed 0)++| 配置 | X3 | proxy10 |+|---|---|---|+| 父节点 19 | 47.03 | 52.75 |+| v1 稠密位移 γ=1 | 49.75 | — |+| **提交:门控位移 γ=1 growth-on** | **58.90** | — |+| 门控 growth-off(对照) | 57.69 | — |+| 门控 γ=2 | 56.82 | — |+| 单输入:prolif 倾斜 λ=0.15 | — | 58.15 |+| **提交:complexity 倾斜 λ=0.15** | — | **58.79** |+| complexity λ=0.5 | — | 54.43 |+| HEART_WEIGHT 2.2 / EDGE 0.2 | — | 58.55 |++节点分估计 = (58.79 + 2×58.90)/3 ≈ 58.9(父 48.94)。++## 偏差与未验证++- PLAN 的 Leiden 聚类换成 KMeans(k=20):确定性更强、无 igraph 依赖、X3 2174 细胞下快;聚类目的(G_c 去噪聚合)等价。+- 未验证:reg_m<0.3、簇数扫描、λ 在两输入路径上的扫描、β<1.0、单输入 prolif vs complexity 在 B 半的表现(A 半差 0.64,噪声内,选了 mmd 更好的 complexity)。+- 单输入路径(58.8)仍低于节点 3/7 的 63.7/64.3:其"型内成熟度选择"具体实现不可见,本次用心脏先验+复杂度倾斜逼近,未完全恢复。++## 确定性 / 视图无关++`np.random.default_rng(seed)`、KMeans(random_state=seed)、randomized_svd(random_state=seed);无全局随机态。只用时间差(Δt_out/Δt_in)与视图内数据;不读 external/、不读绝对阶段名分支。两视图 vec-check 通过;X3 全程 <20s,proxy <5s,纯 CPU(EXECUTION.json gpu=false)。 ## 知识来源 -未使用任何保留阶段/保留基因型的测量信息;未用外部数据(X3 视图挂载的-external/ 未读取——输入本身即 Qiu E8.75/E9.0,输出目标 E9.5 在禁窗外但无对应-外部数据可用)。方法为通用算法知识(非平衡 OT:Séjourné et al. sinkhorn-divergences 框架;生长权重 = 边际失衡,Waddington-OT 生长项的标准做法)。+- 心脏解剖先验(心脏侧类型上调、表面/边缘类型下调、Neural Tube 剔除):E9.5 心脏解剖取样的通用谱系知识,与 src reweight.py(run2 已验证)一致,不含保留阶段测量。+- 增殖基因列表:GO:0007049(细胞周期)通用注释(最终配置未使用,保留在代码里作 TILT_MODE=prolif 分支)。+- 非平衡 OT 生长权重 = 边际失衡:Waddington-OT 生长项的标准做法(Séjourné et al. Sinkhorn divergences 框架)。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pyindex 58e5c44..823659c 100644--- a/solution/run.py+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -1,19 +1,24 @@-"""growth_dynamics draft: unbalanced OT growth weights + barycentric velocity extrapolation.--Two-input path: HVG -> PCA(25) -> unbalanced Sinkhorn OT between the two input-stages -> per-source-cell growth g_i (row marginal imbalance) and barycentric-velocity v_i -> transfer (v, g) to last-stage cells via 5-NN -> extrapolate-z_pred = z_last + alpha * v (alpha = damp * clip(dt_out/dt_train, 1, 1.5)) ->-resample N_out cells with probability proportional to g -> decode to gene space.--Single-input path: growth is not identifiable from one stage; fall back to-copy_last (uniform subsample of the last input stage).--Mechanism control: GROWTH_OFF=1 sets all g_i = 1 (uniform resampling), keeping-the velocity displacement identical. Kept ON for submission.--Only time differences (not absolute times) and view data are used; deterministic-under --seed.+"""growth_dynamics v2: composition trend x cluster-level growth weights + type displacement.++Two-input path (X3-style):+ 1. Type-frequency trend between the two inputs: w_t = c1_t * clip((n1+s)/(n0+s), 0.2, 5)^T,+ T = clip(dt_out/dt_in, 0, 1.5), s = 3 (uses only time differences).+ 2. Unbalanced Sinkhorn OT (reg=0.05, reg_m=0.3) between the two inputs in PCA(25)/HVG(2500)+ space -> per-source-cell growth g_i (row marginal imbalance) -> 5-NN transfer to last-stage+ cells -> KMeans(20) clusters on last stage -> per-cluster median G_c.+ final per-cell weight = w_type(i) * G_cluster(i)^gamma, gamma = 1.0.+ GROWTH_OFF=1 sets G_c = 1 (pure composition trend) - mechanism control.+ 3. Within-type maturity tilt: project cells on the type-level pseudobulk delta+ (mean last - mean first), z-score within type, weight *= exp(lambda*z), lambda = 0.15.+ 4. Type-level displacement: x_out = clip(x + beta * T * delta_t, 0), beta = 1.0,+ optionally gated to genes already expressed in the cell (GATE env).++Single-input path (proxy10-style): heart-anatomy composition prior reweighting+(heart types x1.6, surface/edge types x0.25, Neural Tube dropped) + within-type+proliferation-program tilt (lambda = 0.15); no OT (growth unidentifiable), no+displacement (no second stage to difference).++Deterministic under --seed; only view data and time differences are used. """ from __future__ import annotations @@ -28,29 +33,44 @@ sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))) from src.task1_temporal import view_io # noqa: E402 - # --- hyperparameters (PLAN.json) --- N_HVG = 2500 N_PCA = 25 MAX_TRAIN = 3000 OT_REG = 0.05-OT_REG_M = 2.0-OT_REG_M_FALLBACK = 1.0-OT_REG_M_FALLBACK2 = 0.5+OT_REG_M = 0.3 G_CLIP = (0.4, 2.5)-G_STD_MIN = 0.05-ALPHA_DAMP = float(os.environ.get("GROWTH_DAMP", "0.8"))-T_CLIP = (1.0, 1.5)-V_NORM_CLIP = 2.0 # clip displacement norm to 2x median+K_CLUSTERS = 20 K_TRANSFER = 5-LAMBDA_RESID = 0.4-DECODE = os.environ.get("GROWTH_DECODE", "resid") # "resid" | "blend"+GAMMA = float(os.environ.get("GROWTH_GAMMA", "1.0")) GROWTH_OFF = os.environ.get("GROWTH_OFF", "0") == "1"-GROWTH_SHARP = float(os.environ.get("GROWTH_SHARP", "1.0"))+SMOOTH = 3.0+T_CLIP = (0.0, 1.5)+RATIO_CLIP = (0.2, 5.0)+LAMBDA_TILT = float(os.environ.get("TILT_LAMBDA", "0.15"))+BETA_DISP = float(os.environ.get("DISP_BETA", "1.0"))+GATE_DISP = os.environ.get("DISP_GATE", "1") == "1"+HEART_WEIGHT = float(os.environ.get("HEART_WEIGHT", "1.6"))+EDGE_WEIGHT = float(os.environ.get("EDGE_WEIGHT", "0.25"))++HEART_TYPES = {+ "OFT/RV-CM", "IFT-CM", "AVC-CM", "SV-CM", "LV-CM", "RV-CM", "V-CM",+ "Endothelium", "Endocardium", "BEC",+ "aSHF", "pSHF", "aPHM", "pPHM",+ "JCF", "Pericardium", "Proepicardium",+}+EDGE_TYPES = {"Surface Ectoderm", "EXEM", "Paraxial Mesoderm"}+DROP_TYPES = {"Neural Tube"}++# cell-cycle / proliferation program (general GO:0007049 knowledge, not stage-specific)+PROLIF_GENES = [+ "Mki67", "Top2a", "Cdk1", "Ccnb1", "Ccna2", "Birc5", "Ube2c", "Pcna",+ "Mcm2", "Mcm3", "Mcm4", "Mcm5", "Mcm6", "Mcm7", "Mcm10", "Rrm2", "Tyms",+ "E2f1", "Ccnf", "Gins1", "Pola1", "Prim1", "Cdk4", "Ccnd1", "Ccne1",+] def hvg_indices(X: sparse.csr_matrix, mask: np.ndarray, n_hvg: int) -> np.ndarray:- """Top variable genes among covered genes (seurat-style on log data).""" sub = X[:, mask] mean = np.asarray(sub.mean(axis=0)).ravel() sq = np.asarray(sub.multiply(sub).mean(axis=0)).ravel()@@ -64,14 +84,41 @@ def hvg_indices(X: sparse.csr_matrix, mask: np.ndarray, n_hvg: int) -> np.ndarra return np.sort(idx[keep]) -def fit_pca(A: np.ndarray, k: int, seed: int):- from sklearn.utils.extmath import randomized_svd-- mean = A.mean(axis=0)- C = A - mean- _, _, Vt = randomized_svd(C, k, random_state=seed, n_oversamples=30)- comp = Vt.astype(np.float32)- return mean.astype(np.float32), comp+def largest_remainder(weights: np.ndarray, n: int) -> np.ndarray:+ weights = np.clip(np.asarray(weights, dtype=np.float64), 0, None)+ if n <= 0 or weights.sum() <= 0:+ return np.zeros(len(weights), dtype=int)+ raw = weights / weights.sum() * n+ out = np.floor(raw).astype(int)+ short = int(n - out.sum())+ order = np.argsort(-(raw - out))+ for i in order[:short]:+ out[i] += 1+ return out+++def z_within(scores: np.ndarray, groups: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:+ """z-score `scores` within each group label (stable, deterministic)."""+ z = np.zeros_like(scores, dtype=np.float64)+ for g in np.unique(groups):+ m = groups == g+ s = scores[m]+ if m.sum() < 3:+ continue+ sd = s.std()+ if sd > 1e-9:+ z[m] = (s - s.mean()) / sd+ return np.clip(z, -4.0, 4.0)+++def type_alloc(labels: np.ndarray, type_w: dict, n_out: int, rng) -> dict:+ """Per-type integer allocation proportional to abundance * type_w, then+ within-type sampling handled by caller. Returns {type: (pool_idx, n_take)}."""+ types = [str(t) for t in np.unique(labels) if str(t) not in DROP_TYPES]+ counts = np.array([(labels == t).sum() for t in types], dtype=np.float64)+ w = np.array([type_w.get(t, 1.0) for t in types], dtype=np.float64)+ alloc = largest_remainder(counts * w, n_out)+ return {t: (np.flatnonzero(labels == t), int(n)) for t, n in zip(types, alloc) if n > 0} def main() -> None:@@ -86,130 +133,210 @@ def main() -> None: def _tm(tag): print(f"[time] {tag} {time.time() - _t0:.1f}s", file=sys.stderr)+ view = args.data rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed) manifest = view_io.load_manifest(view) genes = view_io.panel_genes(view, manifest)+ gene_pos = {g: i for i, g in enumerate(genes)} entries = view_io.inputs_by_time(manifest, include_external=True) last = entries[-1] adata_last = view_io.read_stage(view, last, genes, missing="fill")- n_out = view_io.target_n_cells(manifest, adata_last.n_obs)-- if len(entries) < 2:- # single-input fallback: copy_last (uniform subsample of real cells)- idx = view_io.sample_rows(adata_last.n_obs, n_out, rng)- view_io.write_prediction(adata_last.X[idx], genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)- return-- first = entries[-2]- adata_first = view_io.read_stage(view, first, genes, missing="fill")-+ labels_last = view_io.labels_of(adata_last)+ n_last = adata_last.n_obs+ n_out = view_io.target_n_cells(manifest, n_last)++ two = len(entries) >= 2+ adata_first = None+ if two:+ first = entries[-2]+ adata_first = view_io.read_stage(view, first, genes, missing="fill")+ labels_first = view_io.labels_of(adata_first) _tm("read")- cov = np.asarray(adata_last.var["covered"], dtype=bool) & np.asarray(- adata_first.var["covered"], dtype=bool- )- hvg = hvg_indices(adata_last.X, cov, N_HVG)-- _tm("hvg")- # subsample for training- def sub(a, n):- if a.n_obs <= n:- return np.arange(a.n_obs)- return np.sort(rng.choice(a.n_obs, size=n, replace=False))-- i0 = sub(adata_first, MAX_TRAIN)- i1 = sub(adata_last, MAX_TRAIN)- X0 = np.asarray(adata_first.X[i0][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32)- X1 = np.asarray(adata_last.X[i1][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32)-- mean, comp = fit_pca(np.vstack([X0, X1]), N_PCA, args.seed)- Z0 = (X0 - mean) @ comp.T- Z1 = (X1 - mean) @ comp.T- Z1_full = (np.asarray(adata_last.X[:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32) - mean) @ comp.T-- _tm("pca")- # --- unbalanced OT: growth + barycentric velocity on source cells ---- import ot as pot-- a = np.full(Z0.shape[0], 1.0 / Z0.shape[0])- b = np.full(Z1.shape[0], 1.0 / Z1.shape[0])- d = Z0[:, None, :] - Z1[None, :, :]- M = (d * d).sum(-1).astype(np.float64)- M /= max(np.median(M), 1e-8)-- P = rs = None- for reg_m in (OT_REG_M, OT_REG_M_FALLBACK, OT_REG_M_FALLBACK2):- P = pot.sinkhorn_unbalanced(a, b, M, reg=OT_REG, reg_m=reg_m)++ # ---------- type-level composition weights ----------+ if two:+ dt_in = max(float(last["time"]) - float(first["time"]), 1e-6)+ dt_out = max(float(manifest["target"]["time"]) - float(last["time"]), 0.0)+ T = float(np.clip(dt_out / dt_in, *T_CLIP))+ n0 = np.array([(labels_first == t).sum() for t in np.unique(labels_first)])+ cnt0 = {str(t): float(c) for t, c in zip(np.unique(labels_first), n0)}+ cnt1 = {str(t): float((labels_last == t).sum()) for t in np.unique(labels_last)}+ type_w = {}+ for t, c1 in cnt1.items():+ ratio = (c1 + SMOOTH) / (cnt0.get(t, 0.0) + SMOOTH)+ type_w[t] = c1 * float(np.clip(ratio, *RATIO_CLIP)) ** T+ type_w = {t: w / max(cnt1[t], 1.0) for t, w in type_w.items()} # per-cell weight+ deltas = None+ else:+ T = 0.0+ hw = {"heart": HEART_WEIGHT, "edge": EDGE_WEIGHT}+ type_w = {}+ for t in np.unique(labels_last):+ t = str(t)+ if t in HEART_TYPES:+ type_w[t] = hw["heart"]+ elif t in EDGE_TYPES:+ type_w[t] = hw["edge"]+ else:+ type_w[t] = 1.0++ # ---------- growth weights (two-input only) ----------+ growth_cell = np.ones(n_last, dtype=np.float64)+ diag = {"T": T, "G_std": 0.0, "reg_m": OT_REG_M}+ if two and not GROWTH_OFF:+ cov = np.asarray(adata_last.var["covered"], dtype=bool) & np.asarray(+ adata_first.var["covered"], dtype=bool+ )+ hvg = hvg_indices(adata_last.X, cov, N_HVG)++ def sub(a, n):+ if a.n_obs <= n:+ return np.arange(a.n_obs)+ return np.sort(rng.choice(a.n_obs, size=n, replace=False))++ i0 = sub(adata_first, MAX_TRAIN)+ i1 = sub(adata_last, MAX_TRAIN)+ X0 = np.asarray(adata_first.X[i0][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32)+ X1 = np.asarray(adata_last.X[i1][:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32)+ from sklearn.utils.extmath import randomized_svd++ A = np.vstack([X0, X1])+ mean = A.mean(axis=0)+ C = A - mean+ _, _, Vt = randomized_svd(C, N_PCA, random_state=args.seed, n_oversamples=30)+ comp = Vt.astype(np.float32)+ Z0 = ((X0 - mean) @ comp.T).astype(np.float32)+ Z1 = ((X1 - mean) @ comp.T).astype(np.float32)+ Z1_full = (+ (np.asarray(adata_last.X[:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float32) - mean) @ comp.T+ ).astype(np.float32)+ _tm("pca")++ import ot as pot++ a = np.full(Z0.shape[0], 1.0 / Z0.shape[0])+ b = np.full(Z1.shape[0], 1.0 / Z1.shape[0])+ d = Z0[:, None, :] - Z1[None, :, :]+ M = (d * d).sum(-1).astype(np.float64)+ M /= max(np.median(M), 1e-8)+ P = pot.sinkhorn_unbalanced(a, b, M, reg=OT_REG, reg_m=OT_REG_M) rs = P.sum(axis=1)- if np.std(rs * Z0.shape[0]) >= G_STD_MIN:- break- g_src = np.clip(rs * Z0.shape[0], *G_CLIP)-- rs_safe = np.maximum(rs, 1e-12)- v_src = (P @ Z1) / rs_safe[:, None] - Z0- vn = np.linalg.norm(v_src, axis=1)- med = np.median(vn[vn > 0]) if np.any(vn > 0) else 1.0- scale = np.minimum(1.0, (V_NORM_CLIP * med) / np.maximum(vn, 1e-12))- v_src = v_src * scale[:, None]-- _tm("ot")- # --- transfer (v, g) to every last-stage cell via k-NN in PCA space ---- from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors-- nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=K_TRANSFER).fit(Z0)- _, ind = nn.kneighbors(Z1_full)- v_full = v_src[ind].mean(axis=1)- g_full = np.clip(g_src[ind].mean(axis=1), *G_CLIP)-- # --- extrapolation scale from time differences only ---- dt_train = max(float(last["time"]) - float(first["time"]), 1e-6)- dt_out = max(float(manifest["target"]["time"]) - float(last["time"]), 0.0)- T = float(np.clip(dt_out / dt_train, *T_CLIP))- alpha = ALPHA_DAMP * T-- z_pred = Z1_full + alpha * v_full-- # --- growth-weighted resampling ---- if GROWTH_OFF:- sel = view_io.sample_rows(Z1_full.shape[0], n_out, rng)+ g_src = np.clip(rs * Z0.shape[0], *G_CLIP)++ from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors++ nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=K_TRANSFER).fit(Z0)+ _, ind = nn.kneighbors(Z1_full)+ g_full = np.clip(g_src[ind].mean(axis=1), *G_CLIP)++ from sklearn.cluster import KMeans++ km = KMeans(n_clusters=min(K_CLUSTERS, n_last), random_state=args.seed, n_init=10).fit(Z1_full)+ cl = km.labels_+ G_c = np.ones(km.n_clusters)+ for c in range(km.n_clusters):+ m = cl == c+ if m.sum():+ G_c[c] = np.median(g_full[m])+ growth_cell = G_c[cl] ** GAMMA+ diag["G_std"] = float(G_c.std())+ diag["G_min"] = float(G_c.min())+ diag["G_max"] = float(G_c.max())+ _tm("ot")++ # ---------- within-type tilt ----------+ tilt = np.zeros(n_last, dtype=np.float64)+ if two:+ # project on type-level pseudobulk delta direction (maturity along observed change)+ cov = np.asarray(adata_last.var["covered"], dtype=bool) & np.asarray(+ adata_first.var["covered"], dtype=bool+ )+ for t in np.unique(labels_last):+ m = labels_last == t+ mf = labels_first == t+ if m.sum() < 3 or mf.sum() < 3:+ continue+ dl = np.asarray(adata_last.X[m].mean(axis=0)).ravel() - np.asarray(+ adata_first.X[mf].mean(axis=0)+ ).ravel()+ dl = dl * cov+ nrm = np.linalg.norm(dl)+ if nrm < 1e-9:+ continue+ Xs = adata_last.X[m]+ proj = np.asarray(Xs @ (dl / nrm)).ravel()+ tilt[m] = z_within(proj, labels_last[m]) else:- p = g_full**GROWTH_SHARP+ mode = os.environ.get("TILT_MODE", "complexity")+ if mode == "complexity":+ score = np.log1p(np.asarray(adata_last.X.sum(axis=1)).ravel())+ tilt = z_within(score, labels_last)+ else:+ idx = np.array([gene_pos[g] for g in PROLIF_GENES if g in gene_pos], dtype=np.int64)+ covl = np.asarray(adata_last.var["covered"], dtype=bool)[idx]+ idx = idx[covl]+ if idx.size:+ sub = adata_last.X[:, idx]+ score = np.asarray(sub.mean(axis=1)).ravel()+ tilt = z_within(score, labels_last)+ w_tilt = np.exp(LAMBDA_TILT * tilt)++ # ---------- per-cell weights and allocation ----------+ cell_type_w = np.array([type_w.get(str(t), 1.0) for t in labels_last], dtype=np.float64)+ cell_w = cell_type_w * growth_cell * w_tilt+ types_kept = [t for t in np.unique(labels_last) if str(t) not in DROP_TYPES]+ wt = np.array([max(cell_w[labels_last == t].mean(), 1e-9) for t in types_kept])+ cnt = np.array([(labels_last == t).sum() for t in types_kept], dtype=np.float64)+ alloc = largest_remainder(cnt * wt, n_out)++ sel = []+ for t, n in zip(types_kept, alloc):+ if n <= 0:+ continue+ pool = np.flatnonzero(labels_last == t)+ p = cell_w[pool] p = p / p.sum()- sel = rng.choice(Z1_full.shape[0], size=n_out, replace=True, p=p)- sel = np.sort(sel)-- # --- decode to gene space ---- full = np.zeros((n_out, len(genes)), dtype=np.float32)- rows = adata_last.X[sel].toarray().astype(np.float64)- non_hvg = np.setdiff1d(np.flatnonzero(cov), hvg)- if non_hvg.size:- full[:, non_hvg] = rows[:, non_hvg]- if DECODE == "blend":- decoded = z_pred[sel] @ comp + mean- nn2 = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=K_TRANSFER).fit(Z1_full)- _, ind2 = nn2.kneighbors(z_pred[sel])- Xr = np.asarray(adata_last.X[:, hvg].todense(), dtype=np.float64)- nn_mean = Xr[ind2].mean(axis=1)- Xh = (1.0 - LAMBDA_RESID) * decoded + LAMBDA_RESID * nn_mean- else: # "resid": keep real sparse cell, add gene-space displacement- disp = (alpha * v_full[sel]) @ comp # n_out x len(hvg)- if os.environ.get("GROWTH_GATE", "1") == "1":- disp = disp * (rows[:, hvg] > 0)- Xh = rows[:, hvg] + disp- full[:, hvg] = np.maximum(Xh, 0.0).astype(np.float32)- X_out = sparse.csr_matrix(full)-+ take = rng.choice(pool, size=int(n), replace=pool.size < n, p=p)+ sel.append(take)+ sel = np.sort(np.concatenate(sel)) if sel else view_io.sample_rows(n_last, n_out, rng)+ n_out = len(sel)++ # ---------- type-level displacement (two-input only) ----------+ if two and BETA_DISP > 0:+ cov = np.asarray(adata_last.var["covered"], dtype=bool) & np.asarray(+ adata_first.var["covered"], dtype=bool+ )+ rows = adata_last.X[sel].toarray().astype(np.float32)+ sel_labels = labels_last[sel]+ for t in np.unique(sel_labels):+ m = sel_labels == t+ mf = labels_first == t+ if mf.sum() < 3:+ continue+ dl = (+ np.asarray(adata_last.X[labels_last == t].mean(axis=0)).ravel()+ - np.asarray(adata_first.X[mf].mean(axis=0)).ravel()+ ).astype(np.float32)+ dl = dl * cov+ disp = (BETA_DISP * T) * dl+ blk = rows[m]+ if GATE_DISP:+ disp = disp[None, :] * (blk > 0)+ rows[m] = np.maximum(blk + disp, 0.0)+ X_out = sparse.csr_matrix(rows)+ else:+ X_out = adata_last.X[sel] _tm("decode")- # diagnostics to stderr (not part of output)+ print(- f"[growth_dynamics] n_out={n_out} T={T:.3f} alpha={alpha:.3f} "- f"g: mean={g_full.mean():.3f} std={g_full.std():.3f} min={g_full.min():.3f} "- f"max={g_full.max():.3f} frac_out_0.8_1.2={np.mean((g_full < 0.8) | (g_full > 1.2)):.3f} "- f"decode={DECODE} growth_off={GROWTH_OFF}",+ f"[growth_v2] two={two} n_out={n_out} T={diag['T']:.3f} G_std={diag['G_std']:.4f} "+ f"G_range=({diag.get('G_min', 1):.3f},{diag.get('G_max', 1):.3f}) gamma={GAMMA} "+ f"beta={BETA_DISP} gate={GATE_DISP} lambda={LAMBDA_TILT} growth_off={GROWTH_OFF}", file=sys.stderr, )- view_io.write_prediction(X_out.tocsr(), genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+ view_io.write_prediction(X_out, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed) if __name__ == "__main__":
调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。
用到的知识库条目
| 编号 | 标题 | 出处 |
|---|---|---|
| k031 | Offline OT toolkit in the sandbox: moscot TemporalProblem, wot OTModel, POT, geomloss | 10.1038/s41586-024-08453-2 (moscot); 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.006 (Waddington-OT) |
| k041 | Within-stage pseudotime and graph toolkit offline: scanpy DPT/PAGA/Leiden, Palantir, CellRank 2 | 10.1186/s13059-019-1663-x (PAGA); 10.1038/s41587-019-0068-4 (Palantir); 10.1038/s41592-024-02303-9 (CellRank 2) |
| k018 | Damped per-type shift: shrinkage alpha on the observed delta | notes/plan/cards/T1.md |
分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。
| 改了什么 | 重写 run.py 为统一重采样管线:两输入路径用型频率趋势外推 w_t=c1·clip((c1+3)/(c0+3),0.2,5)^T(T=clip(Δt_out/Δt_in,0,1.5))× KMeans-20 簇级非平衡 OT 生长权重 G_c(reg_m 由自适应改为固定 0.3,γ=1.0)× 型内成熟度倾斜 exp(0.15·z),再加稀疏门控的型级伪批量位移(β=1.0);单输入路径弃 copy_last,改为硬编码心脏解剖先验(HEART_TYPES ×1.6 / EDGE_TYPES ×0.25 / DROP Neural Tube)+ 型内复杂度倾斜 λ=0.15,无位移。保留 GROWTH_OFF=1 对照。 |
|---|---|
| 各组分数的变化 | cell_state:变好最多,+14.76(64.57 vs 49.81)。X3 mmd_u 0.03396→0.02139,得分 +5.34(14.65→19.99);proxy10 mmd_u 0.0405→0.03305,得分 +2.61(15.53→18.14)。细胞状态分布确实被拉近真值,是本次收益主体。 covariation:小幅变好,+2.80(51.40 vs 48.59),刚超 T1 ≈2 分噪声。X3 variogram 0.001647→0.001508,得分 +0.51;proxy10 0.001233→0.001123,得分 +0.66。两尺子各单项都在噪声内,方向一致;对比 Engineer 记录的稠密位移崩溃(variogram 得分 3.47)说明稀疏门控至少守住了共变结构。 de_recovery:变好,+11.51(56.42 vs 44.92)。X3 de_score -0.273→0.182,得分 +3.76(10.53→14.29);proxy10 de_score 0.0164→0.139,得分 +1.12(12.63→13.75,刚过地板 12.5,幅度接近噪声)。主要贡献来自 X3,与组成趋势外推+门控位移一致。 direction:变好,+5.55(57.75 vs 52.19)。proxy10 de_direction 0.1785→0.3018,得分 +2.00(14.67→16.66);X3 -0.028→0.0806,得分 +1.08(12.24→13.32)。两尺子同向且都超出单项噪声。 |
| family_id | growth_dynamics |
| 假设是否成立 | unclear |
| 经验 |
|
| mechanism_active | 否 |
| 下一步建议 |
|
对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。
只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。
分析员
| 角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。 | 分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。 | 8 |
| 工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。 | 共 8 次:bash 6、write 1、edit 1 |
| 用时 | 2 分 |
| token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。 | 输入 23,364 · 输出 2,473 · 思考 3,930 |
| 任务(第一行) | 分析节点 n22 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | ANALYSIS.json written |
| 原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/analyst.jsonl 40 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/analyst.stderr |
工程师
| 角色 | 工程师 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 23 |
| 工具调用 | 共 29 次:bash 22、read 4、write 2、edit 1 |
| 用时 | 13 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 64,536 · 输出 11,604 · 思考 14,509 |
| 任务(第一行) | 按计划修改程序:growth_dynamics v2: 型级聚合生长权重+组成趋势融合+单输入继承组成重加权 |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | 完成。做了什么、结果、下一步: **做了什么**(节点 22,improve 自 19):重写 run.py 为统一重采样管线。两输入路径(X3):组成趋势权重(s=3,T=clip(Δt比,0,1.5))× KMeans-20 簇级非平衡 OT 生长权重 G_c(reg_m=0.3,γ=1.0)× 型内成熟度倾斜(λ=0.15),加**稀疏门控**型级伪批量位移(β=1.0);单输入路径(proxy10):弃 copy_last,改为心脏解剖组成先验重加权 + 型内复杂度选择。GROWTH_OFF 对照保留。 **查分**(A 半,seed 0,用 10/20 次):X3 **58.90**(父 47.03;growth-off 对照 57.69,机制弱活性 +1.2 在噪声内但方向正,主要落在 mmd_u/variogram;稠密位移会崩 variogram 到 3.47,门控是关键);proxy10 **58.79**(父 52.75)。节点分估计 ≈58.9(父 48.94,树最佳 56.41)。两视图 vec-check 通过,跨 cwd 确定性验证通过,X3 <20s / proxy <5s 纯 CPU。 **下一步最值得试**:(1) proxy10 单输入路径仍差节点 3/7 约 5 分——其"型内成熟度选择"具体形式(可能比 exp 倾斜更强的排序选择,或非复杂度轴)值得复原;(2) X3 上 β·T 位移幅度扫描(β=0.5 / T 上限 1.0)与门控方式;(3) 生长机制在更长间隔视图(proxy2,0.5 天)上验证可辨识性后再决定是否保留。 |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/engineer.jsonl 162 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/engineer.stderr |
调研员
| 角色 | 调研员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 1 |
| 工具调用 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 20,970 · 输出 1,179 · 思考 1,633 |
| 任务(第一行) | 为节点 n22(改进,父节点 n19)写改进计划 PLAN.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | {
"name": "growth_dynamics v2: 型级聚合生长权重+组成趋势融合+单输入继承组成重加权",
"motivation": "父节点19最大损失在proxy10(-10.92),完全因单输入退路为copy_last,丢掉了节点3/7/13/16已验证的组成重加权收益(proxy10 63.66→52.75)。X3上生长权重对比度不足(NN平滑后std 0.047<0.05),growth-on vs off在±2噪声内(47.16 vs 47.41),机制惰性。两项结构问题需同时修复。",
"approach": "步骤1(单输入路径,保proxy10):实现与节点7/13/16相同的组成重加权+型内成熟度选择作为单输入退路(不再用copy_last)。具体:Leiden聚类(resolution 0.5-1.0)→型频率趋势外推w_t = c1_t · clip((c1_t+5)/(c0_t+5), 0.2, 5)^T(T clip 1.5,平滑s=3)→按权重有放回重采样真实细胞→型内按z_fate相关表达程序排序选细胞(λ=0.15)。单输入无频率趋势时用均匀采样代替(仍优于copy_last因有型内选择)。步骤2(两输入路径,X3):保留非平衡Sinkhorn OT(reg=0.05),但reg_m直接设0.3(跳过自适应,因父节点已证2.0/1.0对比度不足);关键改动:(a)对末阶段细胞做Leiden聚类(k≈15-25),将逐细胞g_i按簇取中位数得到簇级生长G_c;(b)将G_c与组成趋势权重相乘:final_weight_c = trend_c × (G_c)^γ,γ∈{0.5,1.0,2.0}(初值1.0)控制生长信号强度;(c)按final_weight_c有放回重采样真实末阶段细胞;(d)可选位移:保留父节点稀疏门控残差解码(α=0.6,位移只加已表达基因),但若查分显示α>0伤害variogram则设α=0(纯组成)。步骤3(vec-score筛选):先跑X3 A半,确认(a)组成路径≥节点3的48.71;(b)growth-on vs off差值方向;再跑proxy10 A半。步骤4:若G_c std仍<0.1,试reg_m=0.15或GROWTH_SHARP=4(g→g^4归一化)。单输入退路:只有1个输入阶段时走步骤1的组成重加权。",
"expected_groups": ["cell_state", "de_recovery", "direction"],
"risks": "1) 组成重加权实现与节点7/13/16不一致导致proxy10未恢复到63+:Engineer应对比节点7的proxy10 A半分数确认。2) X3间隔仅0.25天,即使reg_m=0.3,簇级生长对比度仍可能不足(G_c std<0.1):此时γ=0(生长关闭)应等于纯组成趋势,不应比节点3差。3) 30分钟内实现两路径(组成+生长)可能紧张:优先保证单输入组成路径正确(占分数主体),两输入路径可简化为仅用G_c调制重采样概率,不做位移。4) Leiden聚类引入随机性:固定random_state=seed。",
"family_id": "growth_dynamics",
"mechanism": "非平衡OT的源边际失衡给出逐细胞生长权重,按Leiden簇聚合去噪后与组成频率趋势相乘,驱动状态依赖的重采样(扩张亚状态被过采样、收缩亚状态被欠采样)。",
"vs_constant_shift": "常数位移对每型施加同一向量、全局比例统一缩放;本方案的组成权重由两阶段频率趋势×簇级生长权重联合决定,是状态相关、数据驱动的——不同簇即使属同一型也可有不同权重,且生长权重来自OT耦合的边际失衡而非预设。",
"mechanism_evidence": "Engineer应报告:(1)簇级G_c的std和极差(std≥0.1为有效信号);(2)growth-on vs growth-off(γ=0)的X3分数差及四组分变化;(3)被过采样/欠采样的簇及其频率变化幅度;(4)与纯组成趋势(节点3等价配置)的对比。若G_c std<0.05且on/off差<1分,机制仍为惰性,如实报告。",
"mechanism_off_control": "环境变量GROWTH_OFF=1:设所有G_c=1(即final_weight_c = trend_c),重采样退化为纯组成趋势。同一程序、同一seed,预期X3分数差在±2内(若机制惰性)或>2(若生长信号有效)。单输入路径不受此开关影响(无OT)。",
"sources": []
} |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/researcher.jsonl 5 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/researcher.stderr |
审查员
| 角色 | 审查员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数 | 7 |
| 工具调用 | 共 13 次:read 8、bash 3、glob 1、write 1 |
| 用时 | 1 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 24,995 · 输出 1,666 · 思考 2,468 |
| 任务(第一行) | 审查节点 n22 的程序是否越界读取、写死目标、钻评分器漏洞 |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | REVIEW.json written |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/reviewer.jsonl 103 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261003-093415-search-t1-r2-D-s1/nodes/22/reviewer.stderr |