Virtual Embryo Challenge更新于 10-03 18:47(北京时间) / 每 5 分钟更新

总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C

节点 n49 在终选来历上

改了什么

运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C
父节点(种子,没有父节点)
子节点n52
操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。草稿
状态已打分
分数搜索目标分 52.29 · X3 52.29 · 3 次复测均分 50.13
审查通过 1 越界读取:未发现问题。run.py 只通过 src.task1_temporal.view_io 的 load_manifest/panel_genes/read_stage/write_prediction 访问视图数据(run.py:35, g37_common.py:16),无绝对路径、.. 、/mnt、/home、data/raw、打分器路径,无联网代码。; 2 硬编码目标统计量:未发现问题。全部数值均为算法超参(N_HVG/N_PCS/SIGMA/ALPHA 等,run.py:37-47);growth_rates 的 logistic 参数(g37_common.py:94-…
用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。10 分
程序版本3d0c226e44b0c2a3fa2698d1de7a03ca5e2539e3 (programs.git)

方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。

来自 programs.git 3d0c226e44:solution/METHOD.md

改了什么

从 ot_moscot(Waddington-OT 耦合 + 重心位移外推)完全替换为 stochastic_bridge 方向的最小实现:在联合 PCA 空间中训练 Schrödinger 桥条件流匹配([SF]²M, Tong et al. 2024)的速度场 v(z,t),路径为 x_t=(1-t)x0+t·x1+σ√(t(1-t))ε,条件速度 u_t=(x1-x0)+σ(1-2t)/(2√(t(1-t)))ε。训练 600 步小型 MLP(128 hidden, SiLU),随机配对。推理时取 t=1 处的漂移,乘以阻尼系数 α=0.7·dt_out/dt_in 推进,加 σ_out·√α 的受控噪声维持扩散。解码:PCA 位移→HVG 基因空间(乘 components 和 sd),只加在非零条目上(addnz),夹到 ≥0。单输入阶段退化为生长加权重抽样复制。机制对照通过环境变量 SB_MECHANISM 实现:full(默认,漂移+噪声)、det(σ=0 确定性 CFM)、noise_only(无漂移只加噪声)。

用到的知识与出处

  • Tong A. et al. Simulation-free Schrödinger bridges for score and flow matching. arXiv:2307.03672 (2024):[SF]²M 条件流匹配公式、熵正则桥路径。
  • 知识条目 k034(torchcfm / OT-CFM / SF2M):PCA 空间训练、解码加回残差、proxy 单阶段退化策略。
  • 方向库 stochastic_bridge 条目:最小实现要求(固定小 σ、t=1 局部漂移推一小步、解码后加回残差)、失败方式(桥外延续是额外假设)、对照设计(σ=0 与纯噪声)。
  • 父节点 ot_moscot 的 addnz 解码策略(G37 在 X3 上验证)和生长加权重抽样(WOT birth-death 模型, Schiebinger 2019)。
  • 通用知识:无禁窗阶段数据;增殖/凋亡基因列表来自 moscot(阶段无关的基因功能注释)。

调研员的计划

名称native r0: Change 1: Replace:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""ot_moscot: Waddington-OT / moscot TemporalProblem coupling, extrapolate
动机OpenEvolve native generation (route C), parent 2, round 0 of 3, half-A score 52.3528
做法## 改了什么
从 ot_moscot(Waddington-OT 耦合 + 重心位移外推)完全替换为 stochastic_bridge 方向的最小实现:在联合 PCA 空间中训练 Schrödinger 桥条件流匹配([SF]²M, Tong et al. 2024)的速度场 v(z,t),路径为 x_t=(1-t)x0+t·x1+σ√(t(1-t))ε,条件速度 u_t=(x1-x0)+σ(1-2t)/(2√(t(1-t)))ε。训练 600 步小型 MLP(128 hidden, SiLU),随机配对。推理时取 t=1 处的漂移,乘以阻尼系数 α=0.7·dt_out/dt_in 推进,加 σ_out·√α 的受控噪声维持扩散。解码:PCA 位移→HVG 基因空间(乘 components 和 sd),只加在非零条目上(addnz),夹到 ≥0。单输入阶段退化为生长加权重抽样复制。机制对照通过环境变量 SB_MECHANISM 实现:full(默认,漂移+噪声)、det(σ=0 确定性 CFM)、noise_only(无漂移只加噪声)。
## 用到的知识与出处
- Tong A. et al. Simulation-free Schrödinger bridges for score and flow matching. arXiv:2307.03672 (2024):[SF]²M 条件流匹配公式、熵正则桥路径。
- 知识条目 k034(torchcfm / OT-CFM / SF2M):PCA 空间训练、解码加回残差、proxy 单阶段退化策略。
- 方向库 stochastic_bridge 条目:最小实现要求(固定小 σ、t=1 局部漂移推一小步、解码后加回残差)、失败方式(桥外延续是额外假设)、对照设计(σ=0 与纯噪声)。
- 父节点 ot_moscot 的 addnz 解码策略(G37 在 X3 上验证)和生长加权重抽样(WOT birth-death 模型, Schiebinger 2019)。
- 通用知识:无禁窗阶段数据;增殖/凋亡基因列表来自 moscot(阶段无关的基因功能注释)。

代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。

对比:这个提交的上一版(种子程序:相对空仓库)。改动的文件:solution/EXECUTION.json +1 −0、solution/METHOD.md +8 −0、solution/README.md +4 −0、solution/g37_common.py +101 −0、solution/run.py +181 −0

diff --git a/solution/EXECUTION.json b/solution/EXECUTION.jsonnew file mode 100644index 0000000..9d5125c--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/EXECUTION.json@@ -0,0 +1 @@+{"gpu": false}diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..88bee6e--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@+## 改了什么+从 ot_moscot(Waddington-OT 耦合 + 重心位移外推)完全替换为 stochastic_bridge 方向的最小实现:在联合 PCA 空间中训练 Schrödinger 桥条件流匹配([SF]²M, Tong et al. 2024)的速度场 v(z,t),路径为 x_t=(1-t)x0+t·x1+σ√(t(1-t))ε,条件速度 u_t=(x1-x0)+σ(1-2t)/(2√(t(1-t)))ε。训练 600 步小型 MLP(128 hidden, SiLU),随机配对。推理时取 t=1 处的漂移,乘以阻尼系数 α=0.7·dt_out/dt_in 推进,加 σ_out·√α 的受控噪声维持扩散。解码:PCA 位移→HVG 基因空间(乘 components 和 sd),只加在非零条目上(addnz),夹到 ≥0。单输入阶段退化为生长加权重抽样复制。机制对照通过环境变量 SB_MECHANISM 实现:full(默认,漂移+噪声)、det(σ=0 确定性 CFM)、noise_only(无漂移只加噪声)。+## 用到的知识与出处+- Tong A. et al. Simulation-free Schrödinger bridges for score and flow matching. arXiv:2307.03672 (2024):[SF]²M 条件流匹配公式、熵正则桥路径。+- 知识条目 k034(torchcfm / OT-CFM / SF2M):PCA 空间训练、解码加回残差、proxy 单阶段退化策略。+- 方向库 stochastic_bridge 条目:最小实现要求(固定小 σ、t=1 局部漂移推一小步、解码后加回残差)、失败方式(桥外延续是额外假设)、对照设计(σ=0 与纯噪声)。+- 父节点 ot_moscot 的 addnz 解码策略(G37 在 X3 上验证)和生长加权重抽样(WOT birth-death 模型, Schiebinger 2019)。+- 通用知识:无禁窗阶段数据;增殖/凋亡基因列表来自 moscot(阶段无关的基因功能注释)。diff --git a/solution/README.md b/solution/README.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..dc1cbaf--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/README.md@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@+# ot_moscot++Waddington-OT / moscot:两个最新输入阶段在联合 PCA 上做非平衡熵 OT 耦合(WOT 增殖/凋亡先验生长),最新阶段按 g^Δt 重抽样,每个细胞沿“kNN 平滑位置 − 耦合祖先均值”再走一个等比例步长,只加在非零基因上,夹到 ≥0。+来自 G37 候选 modeling/candidates/T1/ot_moscot;addnz 解码是在 X3 上选的(详见 METHOD.md)。纯 CPU,final 约 70 s、6.7 GB。diff --git a/solution/g37_common.py b/solution/g37_common.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..8c991b3--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/g37_common.py@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@+"""Helpers of the ot_moscot seed (copy of modeling/candidates/T1/ot_moscot/g37_common.py, G37; stage_pair reads every+input stage of the view).++- ``stage_pair``: the two latest input stages (official, or external in proxy2 / test views) and the gene mask on+  which both are really measured (external stages lack part of the panel; filled columns must not drive dynamics);+- ``embed``: HVG -> z-score (clip 10) -> PCA, fitted on the input stages only (scanpy-style preprocessing);+- ``knn_mean``: per-cell kNN average in the embedding (smooths single-cell noise before taking displacements);+- ``growth_rates``: Waddington-OT / moscot prior growth from proliferation and apoptosis gene scores.+"""++from __future__ import annotations++import numpy as np+from scipy import sparse++from src.task1_temporal.view_io import covered_mask, inputs_by_time, read_stage+++def stage_pair(view, manifest: dict, genes: list[str]):+    """(prev, last, mask, dt_in) for the two latest inputs; prev None with a single input stage."""+    stages = inputs_by_time(manifest, include_external=True)  # every input stage, whatever its source+    last_e = stages[-1]+    last = read_stage(view, last_e, genes)+    mask = covered_mask(view, last_e, genes)+    if len(stages) < 2:+        return None, last, mask, None, last_e+    prev_e = stages[-2]+    prev = read_stage(view, prev_e, genes)+    mask &= covered_mask(view, prev_e, genes)+    return prev, last, mask, float(last_e["time"] - prev_e["time"]), last_e+++def _gene_moments(X: sparse.csr_matrix):+    n = X.shape[0]+    mean = np.asarray(X.mean(axis=0)).ravel()+    sq = np.asarray(X.multiply(X).sum(axis=0)).ravel() / n+    return mean, np.maximum(sq - mean ** 2, 0.0)+++def embed(mats: list, mask: np.ndarray, n_hvg: int, n_pcs: int, seed: int):+    """PCA coordinates of each matrix in ``mats`` (same order), fitted on all of them together.++    Returns (list of Z, info) with info = {hvg, mean, std, components} so displacements can be decoded."""+    from sklearn.decomposition import PCA++    allX = sparse.vstack(mats).tocsr()+    mean, var = _gene_moments(allX)+    var = np.where(mask, var, -1.0)+    hvg = np.sort(np.argsort(var)[::-1][:n_hvg])+    sub = allX[:, hvg].toarray().astype(np.float32)+    mu, sd = mean[hvg].astype(np.float32), np.sqrt(var[hvg]).astype(np.float32)+    sd[sd == 0] = 1.0+    sub -= mu+    sub /= sd+    np.clip(sub, -10, 10, out=sub)+    pca = PCA(n_components=n_pcs, svd_solver="randomized", random_state=seed)+    Z = pca.fit_transform(sub).astype(np.float32)+    out, start = [], 0+    for M in mats:+        out.append(Z[start:start + M.shape[0]])+        start += M.shape[0]+    return out, {"hvg": hvg, "mu": mu, "sd": sd, "components": pca.components_.astype(np.float32)}+++def knn_mean(Z: np.ndarray, X: sparse.csr_matrix, rows: np.ndarray, k: int) -> np.ndarray:+    """Dense (len(rows), n_genes): mean expression of the k nearest cells (in Z, the cell itself included)."""+    from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors++    nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=k).fit(Z)+    idx = nn.kneighbors(Z[rows], return_distance=False)+    W = sparse.csr_matrix((np.full(idx.size, 1.0 / k, dtype=np.float32), idx.ravel(),+                           np.arange(0, idx.size + 1, k)), shape=(len(rows), Z.shape[0]))+    return np.asarray((W @ X).todense(), dtype=np.float32)+++# Waddington-OT prior growth (Schiebinger et al. 2019, Cell; as implemented in moscot.base.problems.birth_death):+# birth = generalised logistic of the proliferation score, death = of the apoptosis score, g = exp(birth - death) / day.+def _gen_logistic(p, sup, inf, center, width):+    return inf + (sup - inf) / (1 + np.exp(-(p - center) / width))+++def growth_rates(adata_list: list, genes: list[str], mask: np.ndarray, seed: int) -> list[np.ndarray]:+    """Per-day growth rate of every cell of each AnnData (scores computed on all of them jointly)."""+    import anndata as ad+    import scanpy as sc+    from moscot.utils.data import apoptosis_markers, proliferation_markers++    ok = set(np.asarray(genes)[mask])+    joint = ad.concat(adata_list, join="inner")+    prolif = [g for g in proliferation_markers("mouse") if g in ok]+    apopt = [g for g in apoptosis_markers("mouse") if g in ok]+    sc.tl.score_genes(joint, prolif, score_name="proliferation", random_state=seed)+    sc.tl.score_genes(joint, apopt, score_name="apoptosis", random_state=seed)+    birth = _gen_logistic(joint.obs["proliferation"].to_numpy(float), 1.7, 0.3, 0.25, 0.5)+    death = _gen_logistic(joint.obs["apoptosis"].to_numpy(float), 1.7, 0.3, 0.1, 0.2)+    g = np.exp(birth - death)+    out, start = [], 0+    for a in adata_list:+        out.append(g[start:start + a.n_obs])+        start += a.n_obs+    return outdiff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..4f70ea5--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@+#!/usr/bin/env python3+"""stochastic_bridge: Schrödinger bridge conditional flow matching ([SF]²M) in PCA space.++Draft node for the stochastic_bridge direction. Trains a small time-dependent velocity field+v(z, t) by regressing the conditional vector field of a Schrödinger bridge between the two+latest input stages in PCA space (Tong et al. 2024, arXiv:2307.03672). The bridge path is+x_t = (1-t)*x0 + t*x1 + sigma*sqrt(t*(1-t))*eps with conditional velocity+u_t = (x1 - x0) + sigma*(1-2t)/(2*sqrt(t*(1-t)))*eps.++At inference, the learned drift at t=1 is evaluated on the output cells and used to push them+forward by a damped fraction of the target interval. A controlled noise term (proportional to+sigma and sqrt(dt)) is added to maintain spread. The displacement is decoded back to gene space+via the PCA components and applied only to non-zero entries (addnz strategy).++Mechanism contrast (SB_MECHANISM env var, default "full"):+  "full"       - drift + noise (the stochastic bridge mechanism)+  "det"        - sigma=0, deterministic CFM (no bridge noise in training or inference)+  "noise_only" - no drift, only isotropic noise added to a copy of the last stage++One input stage: falls back to growth-weighted copy (same as parent).+"""++from __future__ import annotations++import argparse+import os+import sys+from pathlib import Path++import numpy as np++sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent))+from g37_common import embed, growth_rates, stage_pair  # noqa: E402++from src.task1_temporal.view_io import load_manifest, panel_genes, target_n_cells, write_prediction  # noqa: E402++N_HVG = 2000+N_PCS = 30+SIGMA = 0.5+N_TRAIN_STEPS = 600+LR = 1e-3+HIDDEN = 128+ALPHA = 0.7+NOISE_OUT = 0.3+N_THREADS = 8+GROWTH = True+T_EPS = 0.02+++def weighted_rows(w: np.ndarray, n: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:+    p = w / w.sum()+    return np.sort(rng.choice(len(w), size=n, replace=n > len(w), p=p))+++def build_velocity_net(d: int, hidden: int):+    import torch+    import torch.nn as nn++    class VNet(nn.Module):+        def __init__(self):+            super().__init__()+            self.net = nn.Sequential(+                nn.Linear(d + 1, hidden),+                nn.SiLU(),+                nn.Linear(hidden, hidden),+                nn.SiLU(),+                nn.Linear(hidden, d),+            )++        def forward(self, z, t):+            t_exp = t.expand(z.shape[0], 1) if t.dim() == 1 else t+            return self.net(torch.cat([z, t_exp], dim=-1))++    return VNet()+++def train_bridge(Z0: np.ndarray, Z1: np.ndarray, sigma: float, n_steps: int,+                 lr: float, hidden: int, seed: int):+    import torch++    torch.manual_seed(seed)+    torch.set_num_threads(N_THREADS)+    d = Z0.shape[1]+    net = build_velocity_net(d, hidden)+    opt = torch.optim.Adam(net.parameters(), lr=lr)+    x0 = torch.from_numpy(Z0.astype(np.float32))+    x1 = torch.from_numpy(Z1.astype(np.float32))+    n0, n1 = x0.shape[0], x1.shape[0]+    bs = min(256, n0, n1)++    for step in range(n_steps):+        i0 = torch.randint(0, n0, (bs,))+        i1 = torch.randint(0, n1, (bs,))+        a = x0[i0]+        b = x1[i1]+        t = torch.empty(bs, 1).uniform_(T_EPS, 1.0 - T_EPS)+        eps = torch.randn(bs, d)+        st = torch.sqrt(t * (1.0 - t))+        xt = (1.0 - t) * a + t * b + sigma * st * eps+        ut = (b - a) + sigma * (1.0 - 2.0 * t) / (2.0 * st) * eps+        vt = net(xt, t)+        loss = ((vt - ut) ** 2).mean()+        opt.zero_grad()+        loss.backward()+        opt.step()++    return net+++def main() -> None:+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()+    parser.add_argument("--data", required=True)+    parser.add_argument("--out", required=True)+    parser.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)+    args = parser.parse_args()++    mechanism = os.environ.get("SB_MECHANISM", "full")+    manifest = load_manifest(args.data)+    genes = panel_genes(args.data, manifest)+    prev, last, mask, dt_in, last_e = stage_pair(args.data, manifest, genes)+    dt_out = float(manifest["target"]["time"] - last_e["time"])+    rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)+    n = target_n_cells(manifest, last.n_obs)++    if prev is None:+        (g_last,) = growth_rates([last], genes, mask, args.seed)+        rows = weighted_rows(g_last ** dt_out if GROWTH else np.ones(last.n_obs), n, rng)+        write_prediction(last.X[rows], genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+        return++    (Zp, Zl), info = embed([prev.X, last.X], mask, N_HVG, N_PCS, args.seed)+    g_prev, g_last = growth_rates([prev, last], genes, mask, args.seed)+    rows = weighted_rows(g_last ** dt_out if GROWTH else np.ones(last.n_obs), n, rng)++    X = last.X[rows].toarray().astype(np.float32)++    if mechanism == "noise_only":+        hvg = info["hvg"]+        sd = info["sd"]+        noise = rng.standard_normal((n, N_PCS)).astype(np.float32) * NOISE_OUT+        dX_hvg = (noise @ info["components"]) * sd+        step = np.zeros_like(X)+        step[:, hvg] = dX_hvg+        step *= X > 0+        X += step+        np.maximum(X, 0.0, out=X)+        write_prediction(X, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+        return++    sigma_train = SIGMA if mechanism == "full" else 0.0+    net = train_bridge(Zp, Zl, sigma_train, N_TRAIN_STEPS, LR, HIDDEN, args.seed)++    import torch+    torch.set_num_threads(N_THREADS)+    net.eval()++    z_last = torch.from_numpy(Zl[rows].astype(np.float32))+    t_one = torch.ones(z_last.shape[0], 1)+    with torch.no_grad():+        drift = net(z_last, t_one).numpy()++    alpha = ALPHA * dt_out / dt_in+    dz = drift * alpha++    if mechanism == "full":+        dz += rng.standard_normal(dz.shape).astype(np.float32) * NOISE_OUT * np.sqrt(alpha)++    hvg = info["hvg"]+    sd = info["sd"]+    dX_hvg = (dz @ info["components"]) * sd+    step = np.zeros_like(X)+    step[:, hvg] = dX_hvg+    step[:, ~mask] = 0.0+    step *= X > 0+    X += step+    np.maximum(X, 0.0, out=X)+    write_prediction(X, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+++if __name__ == "__main__":+    main()

调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。

没有记录调研来源。

分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。

改了什么整包替换 run.py:从 ot_moscot(moscot 熵 OT 耦合 + 重心位移外推)换成 stochastic_bridge 的 [SF]^2M 最小实现——联合 PCA(30 PCs) 上训练 600 步 MLP(128, SiLU) 速度场,桥路径 sigma=0.5、随机配对,推理在 t=1 取漂移乘 alpha=0.7*dt_out/dt_in,并叠加 NOISE_OUT=0.3*sqrt(alpha) 的 PCA 各向同性噪声;解码仍是 addnz(乘 components 和 sd、只加非零项、clip>=0),输出细胞仍是父节点的生长加权重抽样复制;新增 SB_MECHANISM(full/det/noise_only) 开关但会话中无任何对照运行记录,README.md 仍是父节点 ot_moscot 的旧文字。
各组分数的变化board:噪声内 +1.64(50.65 -> 52.29);耗时 10.5s -> 12.3s,内存峰值 1.68 -> 1.40 GB
cell_state:变好 +15.16(50.07 -> 65.23),远超噪声
covariation:变坏 -8.83(52.52 -> 43.69),远超噪声
de_recovery:变坏 -5.85(51.38 -> 45.53),远超 T1 约 2 分噪声
direction:噪声内 +1.28(49.14 -> 50.42),PLAN 声称桥漂移主要改善这一组,未获支持
family_idstochastic_bridge
假设是否成立否
经验
  1. 在 T1 上把确定性 OT 耦合位移换成 [SF]^2M 桥漂移 + 输出端 PCA 各向同性噪声(NOISE_OUT=0.3)时,榜分只 +1.64(噪声内),但分组剧烈重排:cell_state +15.2 而 covariation -8.8、de_recovery -5.9——输出端注入的各向同性噪声换来分布层面匹配、破坏基因间协变与 DE 恢复,在总分上近似抵消。
  2. 速度场训练时 t 采样区间是 [0.02, 0.98],推理却在 t=1 求值,属于训练分布外外推,漂移方向不可靠;应在 1-T_EPS 处取值或改成少步 SDE/ODE 积分。
  3. 代码里预留 SB_MECHANISM 开关不等于做了机制对照:本节点会话中没有 det / noise_only 的任何运行与分数,导致 cell_state 的 +15 无法归因到桥漂移还是纯噪声;draft 节点必须至少各跑一次并记录四组分数。
  4. 只替换位移部件(保留父节点的 OT 耦合位移做 A/B)比整包换方法族更可归因;本节点同时改掉了配对方式(OT -> 随机)和外推方式,两个变量混在一起。
  5. 整包替换时要同步更新 README.md/METHOD.md,否则文档仍描述父节点方法,会误导后续 Researcher。
mechanism_activeunclear
下一步建议
  1. 针对 covariation/de_recovery:先跑 SB_MECHANISM=det(sigma=0)与 noise_only 各一次并记录四组分数,确认 cell_state +15.2 是否全部来自 NOISE_OUT;随后把 NOISE_OUT 从 0.3 扫到 0 / 0.05 / 0.1 / 0.2,保留能守住 covariation>=50 的最大值。
  2. 针对 direction:把推理时刻从 t=1 改为 0.98,ALPHA 扫 0.3 / 0.7 / 1.2,并把 N_TRAIN_STEPS 从 600 提到 1500(batch 256、lr 1e-3、hidden 128 不变),只有 direction 提升超过约 2 分才算有效。
  3. 针对 de_recovery:在 addnz 之上给每基因位移加限幅(clip 到 ±1 个基因 sd),防止少数主 PC 主导的位移淹没 DE 基因;并考虑用父节点的 moscot OT 耦合做训练配对替换随机配对(同一 run 内 A/B)。

对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。

只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。

分析员

角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。9
工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。共 11 次:bash 8、grep 2、write 1
用时1 分
token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。输入 20,350 · 输出 1,727 · 思考 1,895
任务(第一行)分析节点 n49 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json
最后的回答(摘录)
ANALYSIS.json written
原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/analyst.jsonl 33 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/analyst.stderr

native

角色native alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数3 次
轮数0
工具调用共 0 次:—
用时7 分
token 数输入 69,041 · 输出 7,884 · 思考 11,259
任务(第一行)—
最后的回答(摘录)—
原始记录位置—

审查员

角色审查员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数5
工具调用共 7 次:bash 3、read 3、write 1
用时不到 1 分
token 数输入 15,722 · 输出 1,159 · 思考 835
任务(第一行)审查节点 n49 的程序是否越界读取、写死目标、钻评分器漏洞
最后的回答(摘录)
REVIEW.json written
原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/reviewer.jsonl 70 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/reviewer.stderr

stream

角色stream
调用次数0 次
轮数3
工具调用共 0 次:—
用时7 分
token 数输入 69,041 · 输出 7,884 · 思考 11,259
任务(第一行)—
最后的回答(摘录)
I'll analyze the task and produce an improved version of the program. Let me first read the full current program.

<tool_call>
<function=read_file>
<parameter=path>
/home/spark-longxinyang/.local/state/vec-report/calls/2-202908-search-t1-scr-C-n49-920eaf/work/PROMPT.md
</parameter>
<parameter=offset>
630
</parameter>
</function>
</tool_call>
原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/native/0/stream.jsonl 24 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/native/1/stream.jsonl 4 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/49/native/2/stream.jsonl 1 KB