总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C

节点 n27

改了什么

方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md：这个程序做了什么、为什么。

来自 programs.git 3c114c9d50:solution/METHOD.md

调研员的计划

代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别：绿色是新增，红色是删除。

对比：父节点版本 50cdac1f61。改动的文件：solution/METHOD.md +7 −9、solution/run.py +28 −18

diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdindex 29534f7..1fc32a8 100644--- a/solution/METHOD.md+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -1,11 +1,9 @@ ## 改了什么-相对父节点（纯 copy_last）做了两处改动：-1. 分层抽样（stratified sampling）：按细胞类型比例精确分配输出细胞数，改善 cell_state 指标（实验表 attempt 2 验证：51.22 vs 49.68）。-2. 稀疏逐类型伪批量位移：当有两个输入阶段时，计算同名类型的 delta，但只保留每个类型中 |delta| 最大的 5% 基因（TOP_GENE_FRAC=0.05），其余基因位移置零。对这些基因施加 alpha=0.08 的位移并 clip≥0。第 0 轮（alpha=0.12 全基因位移）使 covariation 从 48.44 暴跌到 36.87；第 1 轮（alpha=0.02 全基因位移）仍使 covariation 降至 44.87。本轮改为只移动最显著的 5% 基因，预期 95% 基因不动从而保持基因间共变结构，同时给 DE 基因提供方向信号改善 de_recovery。只有一个输入阶段时退化为分层 copy。+相对父节点（纯分层抽样 copy_last）做了两处改动：+1. 分层抽样加入 min_per_type=3 逻辑：确保稀有类型至少分配 3 个细胞，超出时从分配最多的类型扣减。实验表 Attempt 2 验证此逻辑使 direction 从 49.87 提升到 51.17。+2. 极保守稀疏位移：仅当两个输入阶段都存在时，对同名类型中细胞数 ≥20 的类型，取 |delta| 最大的 2% 基因（TOP_GENE_FRAC=0.02），施加 alpha=0.015 的位移。有效位移量 = 2% × 0.015 = 0.03%，是父节点（5% × 0.08 = 0.4%）的 1/13，预期 covariation 损失 <0.2 分（噪声内），同时为 de_recovery 和 direction 提供微弱方向信号。 ## 用到的知识与出处-- 方法卡 k018：收缩系数 alpha∈[0,1]，alpha=1 低于 copy_last，需保守取值。-- 方法卡 k012：pseudobulk_shift 定义。-- 第 0 轮反馈：全基因常数位移严重破坏 covariation。-- 第 1 轮反馈：即使 alpha=0.02，全基因位移仍使 covariation 损失 ~3.6 分。-- 实验表 attempt 2：分层抽样本身（无位移）得分 48.9971，优于当前 48.00。-- 稀疏位移思路：只移动最显著变化的基因可最大限度保留整体共变结构（类似 empirical Bayes 基因级收缩，参考 k018 "Optionally shrink per gene"）。+- 实验表 Attempt 2（score 49.34，direction 51.17）：min_per_type=3 逻辑对 direction 有正向贡献。+- 父节点 ANALYSIS lessons：全基因位移和 5% 稀疏位移均使 covariation 损失超过收益；需更极端稀疏化。+- 方法卡 k018：alpha 需保守，收缩系数 ∈[0,1]。+- 第 0 轮实验：经验贝叶斯软收缩（触及所有基因）比硬阈值更差，确认只有极稀疏硬阈值可行。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pyindex c8f2657..533e610 100644--- a/solution/run.py+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ #!/usr/bin/env python3-"""Stratified copy + conservative per-type pseudobulk shift (alpha=0.12).--When two input stages exist, compute per-type delta = mean(last|c) - mean(prev|c)-and shift cells of same-name types by alpha * delta in log space, clipped >= 0.-Stratified sampling preserves type proportions exactly.-Falls back to plain stratified copy with one input stage.-"""+"""Stratified copy_last: output max cells with exact type-proportional sampling."""  from __future__ import annotations @@ -23,9 +17,11 @@ from src.task1_temporal.view_io import (     write_prediction, ) -ALPHA = 0.08-MIN_CELLS_PER_TYPE = 5-TOP_GENE_FRAC = 0.05+ALPHA = 0.015+TOP_GENE_FRAC = 0.02+MIN_CELLS_SHIFT = 20++   def stratified_sample(labels: np.ndarray, n_out: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:@@ -33,8 +29,24 @@ def stratified_sample(labels: np.ndarray, n_out: int, rng: np.random.Generator)     type_counts = np.array([(labels == t).sum() for t in unique_types])     props = type_counts / type_counts.sum()     allocations = np.floor(props * n_out).astype(int)-    remainder = n_out - allocations.sum()-    if remainder > 0:+    min_per_type = 3+    for i in range(len(unique_types)):+        if allocations[i] < min_per_type and type_counts[i] >= min_per_type:+            allocations[i] = min_per_type+    total_alloc = allocations.sum()+    if total_alloc > n_out:+        excess = total_alloc - n_out+        order = np.argsort(-(allocations - np.floor(props * n_out)))+        for idx in order:+            if excess <= 0:+                break+            reducible = allocations[idx] - min_per_type+            if reducible > 0:+                take = min(reducible, excess)+                allocations[idx] -= take+                excess -= take+    elif total_alloc < n_out:+        remainder = n_out - total_alloc         frac = props * n_out - allocations         top_idx = np.argsort(-frac)[: int(remainder)]         allocations[top_idx] += 1@@ -75,27 +87,25 @@ def main() -> None:         else:             X_out = np.array(X_last, dtype=np.float32) -        common_types = set(labels) & set(prev_labels)-        for ct in common_types:+        for ct in set(labels) & set(prev_labels):             mask_prev = prev_labels == ct             mask_last = labels == ct             n_prev = int(mask_prev.sum())             n_last = int(mask_last.sum())-            if n_prev < MIN_CELLS_PER_TYPE or n_last == 0:+            if n_prev < MIN_CELLS_SHIFT or n_last < MIN_CELLS_SHIFT:                 continue             X_prev_ct = prev.X[mask_prev]             if sp.issparse(X_prev_ct):                 mean_prev = np.asarray(X_prev_ct.mean(axis=0)).flatten().astype(np.float32)             else:                 mean_prev = np.asarray(X_prev_ct, dtype=np.float32).mean(axis=0)-            X_ct = X_out[mask_last]-            mean_last = X_ct.mean(axis=0)+            mean_last = np.asarray(X_out[mask_last].mean(axis=0)).flatten()             delta = mean_last - mean_prev             if np.abs(delta).max() < 1e-8:                 continue             thresh = np.percentile(np.abs(delta), 100.0 * (1.0 - TOP_GENE_FRAC))             sparse_delta = np.where(np.abs(delta) >= thresh, delta, 0.0)-            X_out[mask_last] = np.clip(X_ct + ALPHA * sparse_delta, 0, None)+            X_out[mask_last] = np.clip(X_out[mask_last] + ALPHA * sparse_delta, 0, None)          rows = stratified_sample(labels, n_out, rng)         write_prediction(X_out[rows], genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)

调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果（只列标题和编号）。

没有记录调研来源。

分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json：改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。

对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计：轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录；原始记录只给路径。

只给统计和最后回答的摘录；完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。

分析员

ANALYSIS.json written

native

stream

Looking at the results: Round 1 pure stratified copy scored 48.87. Attempt 2 (same approach but with `min_per_type=3` and explicit `max_cells`) scored 49.34 with notably better direction (51.17 vs 49.87). The difference is the min_per_type enforcement ensuring rare types are represented.

I'll add the min_per_type logic and a very conservative sparse shift (top 2% genes, alpha=0.015) that should be ~13x less disruptive to covariation than the parent's 5%/0.08 while still providing directional signal.

<<<<<<< SEARCH
def stratified_sample(labels: np.ndarray, n_out: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:
    unique_types = np.unique(labels)
    type_counts = np.array([(labels == t).sum() for t in unique_types])
    props = type_counts / type_counts.sum()
    allocations = np.floor(props * n_out).astype(int)
    remainder = n_out - allocations.sum()
    if remainder > 0:
        frac = props * n_out - allocations
        top_idx = np.argsort(-frac)[: int(remainder)]
        allocations[top_idx] += 1
    rows_list = []
    for i, t in enumerate(unique_types):
        type_idx = np.where(labels == t)[0]
        n_sample = min(int(allocations[i]), len(type_idx))
        if n_sample > 0:
            chosen = rng.choice(type_idx, size=n_sample, replace=False)
            rows_list.append(chosen)
    rows = np.concatenate(rows_list)
    rng.shuffle(rows)
    return rows
=======
def stratified_sample(labels: np.ndarray, n_out: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:
    unique_types = np.unique(labels)
    type_counts = np.array([(labels == t).sum() for t in unique_types])
    props = type_counts / type_counts.sum()
    allocations = np.floor(props * n_out).astype(int)
    min_per_type = 3
    for i in range(len(unique_types)):
        if allocations[i] < min_per_type and type_counts[i] >= min_per_type:
            allocations[i] = min_per_type
    total_alloc = allocations.sum()
    if total_alloc > n_out:
        excess = total_alloc - n_out
        order = np.argsort(-(allocations - np.floor(props * n_out)))
        for idx in order: