Virtual Embryo Challenge更新于 10-03 18:47(北京时间) / 每 5 分钟更新

总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C

节点 n15

改了什么

运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C
父节点(种子,没有父节点)
子节点n16
操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。草稿
状态已打分
分数搜索目标分 51.09 · X3 51.09 · 3 次复测均分 49.65
审查通过 1 越界读取:未发现问题。run.py 只通过 src.task1_temporal.view_io(load_manifest/panel_genes/read_stage 等)和 --data 指向的视图读取数据,无绝对路径、'..'、/mnt、/home、data/raw、打分器或 src/common/evaluation 访问,无联网;g37_common.py 同样只用 view_io 和 moscot/sklearn 库。; 2 硬编码目标统计量:未发现问题。run.py:43-54 的常量均为模型超参(HVG 数、latent 维、epochs、混合系数等);g37_comm…
用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。7 分
程序版本72102db813a6a6d3123718f553f529f54fc5733b (programs.git)

方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。

来自 programs.git 72102db813:solution/METHOD.md

改了什么

相对父节点(ot_moscot)的全部改动:

  1. 方法族替换为 generative_latent:小型高斯 VAE(MLP 256→128→15维latent→128→256→HVG)在所有输入阶段的 top-2000 HVG 上训练;
  2. 状态依赖位移:在 latent 空间中用 k=20 近邻匹配估计每个细胞的位移(z_last - mean(z_prev_knn)),外推 λ=0.5 * (dt_out/dt_in);
  3. 解码后与原始表达保守混合:step = (decoded - original) * 0.25,只加在非零位点(addnz),非 HVG 基因不动;
  4. 单输入阶段退化为生长加权复制;
  5. ZERO_TRANSITION=1 环境变量可关闭位移(仅编码-解码对照)。

本轮(第2轮)修复:

  • cell_state 33.61 说明解码器严重破坏细胞状态。将混合比例从 0.7 decoded / 0.3 original 改为 0.25 的步长系数(即 original + 0.25*(decoded-original)),大幅保守;
  • LAMBDA 从 1.0 降到 0.5,减少外推幅度;
  • latent dim 从 20 降到 15,减少过拟合;
  • epochs 从 8 增到 25,改善重建质量;
  • KL 权重从 0.1 降到 0.01,让 VAE 优先重建而非压缩。

用到的知识与出处

  • Lopez R. et al. scVI, Nat Methods 2018 (10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2):VAE 框架。
  • 方法卡 k035:log1p(CP10k) 无 counts,用高斯 VAE;HVG 训练,非 HVG 保留。
  • 方法卡 k030:latent 动力学弱可辨识,需保守外推。
  • 方向规格:状态依赖转移、零转移对照、解码器不跌破照抄。

调研员的计划

名称native r2: Change 1: Replace:
N_HVG = 2000
LATENT_DIM = 20
HIDDEN1 = 256
HIDDEN2 = 128
N_EPOCHS = 8
BATCH_SIZE = 512
动机OpenEvolve native generation (route C), parent 2, round 2 of 3, half-A score 51.8248
做法## 改了什么
相对父节点(ot_moscot)的全部改动:
1. 方法族替换为 generative_latent:小型高斯 VAE(MLP 256→128→15维latent→128→256→HVG)在所有输入阶段的 top-2000 HVG 上训练;
2. 状态依赖位移:在 latent 空间中用 k=20 近邻匹配估计每个细胞的位移(z_last - mean(z_prev_knn)),外推 λ=0.5 * (dt_out/dt_in);
3. 解码后与原始表达保守混合:step = (decoded - original) * 0.25,只加在非零位点(addnz),非 HVG 基因不动;
4. 单输入阶段退化为生长加权复制;
5. ZERO_TRANSITION=1 环境变量可关闭位移(仅编码-解码对照)。

本轮(第2轮)修复:
- cell_state 33.61 说明解码器严重破坏细胞状态。将混合比例从 0.7 decoded / 0.3 original 改为 0.25 的步长系数(即 original + 0.25*(decoded-original)),大幅保守;
- LAMBDA 从 1.0 降到 0.5,减少外推幅度;
- latent dim 从 20 降到 15,减少过拟合;
- epochs 从 8 增到 25,改善重建质量;
- KL 权重从 0.1 降到 0.01,让 VAE 优先重建而非压缩。

## 用到的知识与出处
- Lopez R. et al. scVI, Nat Methods 2018 (10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2):VAE 框架。
- 方法卡 k035:log1p(CP10k) 无 counts,用高斯 VAE;HVG 训练,非 HVG 保留。
- 方法卡 k030:latent 动力学弱可辨识,需保守外推。
- 方向规格:状态依赖转移、零转移对照、解码器不跌破照抄。

代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。

对比:这个提交的上一版(种子程序:相对空仓库)。改动的文件:solution/EXECUTION.json +1 −0、solution/METHOD.md +20 −0、solution/README.md +4 −0、solution/g37_common.py +101 −0、solution/run.py +223 −0

diff --git a/solution/EXECUTION.json b/solution/EXECUTION.jsonnew file mode 100644index 0000000..9d5125c--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/EXECUTION.json@@ -0,0 +1 @@+{"gpu": false}diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..70def7a--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@+## 改了什么+相对父节点(ot_moscot)的全部改动:+1. 方法族替换为 generative_latent:小型高斯 VAE(MLP 256→128→15维latent→128→256→HVG)在所有输入阶段的 top-2000 HVG 上训练;+2. 状态依赖位移:在 latent 空间中用 k=20 近邻匹配估计每个细胞的位移(z_last - mean(z_prev_knn)),外推 λ=0.5 * (dt_out/dt_in);+3. 解码后与原始表达保守混合:step = (decoded - original) * 0.25,只加在非零位点(addnz),非 HVG 基因不动;+4. 单输入阶段退化为生长加权复制;+5. ZERO_TRANSITION=1 环境变量可关闭位移(仅编码-解码对照)。++本轮(第2轮)修复:+- cell_state 33.61 说明解码器严重破坏细胞状态。将混合比例从 0.7 decoded / 0.3 original 改为 0.25 的步长系数(即 original + 0.25*(decoded-original)),大幅保守;+- LAMBDA 从 1.0 降到 0.5,减少外推幅度;+- latent dim 从 20 降到 15,减少过拟合;+- epochs 从 8 增到 25,改善重建质量;+- KL 权重从 0.1 降到 0.01,让 VAE 优先重建而非压缩。++## 用到的知识与出处+- Lopez R. et al. scVI, Nat Methods 2018 (10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2):VAE 框架。+- 方法卡 k035:log1p(CP10k) 无 counts,用高斯 VAE;HVG 训练,非 HVG 保留。+- 方法卡 k030:latent 动力学弱可辨识,需保守外推。+- 方向规格:状态依赖转移、零转移对照、解码器不跌破照抄。diff --git a/solution/README.md b/solution/README.mdnew file mode 100644index 0000000..dc1cbaf--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/README.md@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@+# ot_moscot++Waddington-OT / moscot:两个最新输入阶段在联合 PCA 上做非平衡熵 OT 耦合(WOT 增殖/凋亡先验生长),最新阶段按 g^Δt 重抽样,每个细胞沿“kNN 平滑位置 − 耦合祖先均值”再走一个等比例步长,只加在非零基因上,夹到 ≥0。+来自 G37 候选 modeling/candidates/T1/ot_moscot;addnz 解码是在 X3 上选的(详见 METHOD.md)。纯 CPU,final 约 70 s、6.7 GB。diff --git a/solution/g37_common.py b/solution/g37_common.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..8c991b3--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/g37_common.py@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@+"""Helpers of the ot_moscot seed (copy of modeling/candidates/T1/ot_moscot/g37_common.py, G37; stage_pair reads every+input stage of the view).++- ``stage_pair``: the two latest input stages (official, or external in proxy2 / test views) and the gene mask on+  which both are really measured (external stages lack part of the panel; filled columns must not drive dynamics);+- ``embed``: HVG -> z-score (clip 10) -> PCA, fitted on the input stages only (scanpy-style preprocessing);+- ``knn_mean``: per-cell kNN average in the embedding (smooths single-cell noise before taking displacements);+- ``growth_rates``: Waddington-OT / moscot prior growth from proliferation and apoptosis gene scores.+"""++from __future__ import annotations++import numpy as np+from scipy import sparse++from src.task1_temporal.view_io import covered_mask, inputs_by_time, read_stage+++def stage_pair(view, manifest: dict, genes: list[str]):+    """(prev, last, mask, dt_in) for the two latest inputs; prev None with a single input stage."""+    stages = inputs_by_time(manifest, include_external=True)  # every input stage, whatever its source+    last_e = stages[-1]+    last = read_stage(view, last_e, genes)+    mask = covered_mask(view, last_e, genes)+    if len(stages) < 2:+        return None, last, mask, None, last_e+    prev_e = stages[-2]+    prev = read_stage(view, prev_e, genes)+    mask &= covered_mask(view, prev_e, genes)+    return prev, last, mask, float(last_e["time"] - prev_e["time"]), last_e+++def _gene_moments(X: sparse.csr_matrix):+    n = X.shape[0]+    mean = np.asarray(X.mean(axis=0)).ravel()+    sq = np.asarray(X.multiply(X).sum(axis=0)).ravel() / n+    return mean, np.maximum(sq - mean ** 2, 0.0)+++def embed(mats: list, mask: np.ndarray, n_hvg: int, n_pcs: int, seed: int):+    """PCA coordinates of each matrix in ``mats`` (same order), fitted on all of them together.++    Returns (list of Z, info) with info = {hvg, mean, std, components} so displacements can be decoded."""+    from sklearn.decomposition import PCA++    allX = sparse.vstack(mats).tocsr()+    mean, var = _gene_moments(allX)+    var = np.where(mask, var, -1.0)+    hvg = np.sort(np.argsort(var)[::-1][:n_hvg])+    sub = allX[:, hvg].toarray().astype(np.float32)+    mu, sd = mean[hvg].astype(np.float32), np.sqrt(var[hvg]).astype(np.float32)+    sd[sd == 0] = 1.0+    sub -= mu+    sub /= sd+    np.clip(sub, -10, 10, out=sub)+    pca = PCA(n_components=n_pcs, svd_solver="randomized", random_state=seed)+    Z = pca.fit_transform(sub).astype(np.float32)+    out, start = [], 0+    for M in mats:+        out.append(Z[start:start + M.shape[0]])+        start += M.shape[0]+    return out, {"hvg": hvg, "mu": mu, "sd": sd, "components": pca.components_.astype(np.float32)}+++def knn_mean(Z: np.ndarray, X: sparse.csr_matrix, rows: np.ndarray, k: int) -> np.ndarray:+    """Dense (len(rows), n_genes): mean expression of the k nearest cells (in Z, the cell itself included)."""+    from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors++    nn = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=k).fit(Z)+    idx = nn.kneighbors(Z[rows], return_distance=False)+    W = sparse.csr_matrix((np.full(idx.size, 1.0 / k, dtype=np.float32), idx.ravel(),+                           np.arange(0, idx.size + 1, k)), shape=(len(rows), Z.shape[0]))+    return np.asarray((W @ X).todense(), dtype=np.float32)+++# Waddington-OT prior growth (Schiebinger et al. 2019, Cell; as implemented in moscot.base.problems.birth_death):+# birth = generalised logistic of the proliferation score, death = of the apoptosis score, g = exp(birth - death) / day.+def _gen_logistic(p, sup, inf, center, width):+    return inf + (sup - inf) / (1 + np.exp(-(p - center) / width))+++def growth_rates(adata_list: list, genes: list[str], mask: np.ndarray, seed: int) -> list[np.ndarray]:+    """Per-day growth rate of every cell of each AnnData (scores computed on all of them jointly)."""+    import anndata as ad+    import scanpy as sc+    from moscot.utils.data import apoptosis_markers, proliferation_markers++    ok = set(np.asarray(genes)[mask])+    joint = ad.concat(adata_list, join="inner")+    prolif = [g for g in proliferation_markers("mouse") if g in ok]+    apopt = [g for g in apoptosis_markers("mouse") if g in ok]+    sc.tl.score_genes(joint, prolif, score_name="proliferation", random_state=seed)+    sc.tl.score_genes(joint, apopt, score_name="apoptosis", random_state=seed)+    birth = _gen_logistic(joint.obs["proliferation"].to_numpy(float), 1.7, 0.3, 0.25, 0.5)+    death = _gen_logistic(joint.obs["apoptosis"].to_numpy(float), 1.7, 0.3, 0.1, 0.2)+    g = np.exp(birth - death)+    out, start = [], 0+    for a in adata_list:+        out.append(g[start:start + a.n_obs])+        start += a.n_obs+    return outdiff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pynew file mode 100644index 0000000..e2fd4c7--- /dev/null+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@+#!/usr/bin/env python3+"""generative_latent draft: Gaussian VAE with state-dependent latent transition.++Trains a small Gaussian VAE on HVG from all input stages, computes per-cell latent+displacements between stages via kNN matching in latent space, extrapolates the+displacement for the target interval, and decodes back to gene space. The transition+is state-dependent: each cell's displacement depends on its position in latent space+(through its local neighborhood in the earlier stage), not a constant per-type shift.++Two input stages:+  1. Select top HVG by variance across all input cells;+  2. Train a 2-layer MLP Gaussian VAE (encoder: HVG->256->128->latent, decoder mirrors);+  3. Encode all cells to get latent representations;+  4. For each last-stage cell, find k nearest prev-stage neighbors in latent space;+     displacement = z_last - mean(z_prev_neighbors);+  5. Sample output cells from last stage (growth-weighted);+  6. Extrapolate: z_target = z_last + displacement * (dt_out / dt_in);+  7. Decode z_target through the trained decoder;+  8. Blend decoded HVG with original expression; copy non-HVG genes from originals;+  9. Apply addnz constraint (only modify non-zero entries), clip at 0.++One input stage: growth-weighted copy of the latest stage (same fallback as parent).++Mechanism control: set ZERO_TRANSITION=1 to disable the latent displacement+(encode-decode only, no extrapolation). Default is 0 (mechanism active).+"""++from __future__ import annotations++import argparse+import os+import sys+from pathlib import Path++import numpy as np+from scipy import sparse++sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent))+from g37_common import growth_rates, stage_pair  # noqa: E402++from src.task1_temporal.view_io import load_manifest, panel_genes, target_n_cells, write_prediction  # noqa: E402++N_HVG = 2000+LATENT_DIM = 15+HIDDEN1 = 256+HIDDEN2 = 128+N_EPOCHS = 25+BATCH_SIZE = 512+LR = 1e-3+K_NEIGHBORS = 20+LAMBDA = 0.5+BLEND_DECODED = 0.25+ZERO_TRANSITION = int(os.environ.get("ZERO_TRANSITION", "0"))+N_THREADS = 8+++def weighted_rows(w: np.ndarray, n: int, rng: np.random.Generator) -> np.ndarray:+    p = w / w.sum()+    return np.sort(rng.choice(len(w), size=n, replace=n > len(w), p=p))+++def select_hvg(X: sparse.csr_matrix, mask: np.ndarray, n_hvg: int) -> np.ndarray:+    n = X.shape[0]+    mean = np.asarray(X.mean(axis=0)).ravel()+    sq = np.asarray(X.multiply(X).sum(axis=0)).ravel() / n+    var = np.maximum(sq - mean ** 2, 0.0)+    var = np.where(mask, var, -1.0)+    return np.sort(np.argsort(var)[::-1][:n_hvg])+++def train_vae(X_train: np.ndarray, latent_dim: int, seed: int):+    import torch+    import torch.nn as nn+    from torch.utils.data import DataLoader, TensorDataset++    torch.manual_seed(seed)+    torch.set_num_threads(N_THREADS)++    n_genes = X_train.shape[1]+    dataset = TensorDataset(torch.from_numpy(X_train))+    loader = DataLoader(dataset, batch_size=BATCH_SIZE, shuffle=True,+                        generator=torch.Generator().manual_seed(seed))++    class VAE(nn.Module):+        def __init__(self):+            super().__init__()+            self.enc = nn.Sequential(+                nn.Linear(n_genes, HIDDEN1), nn.ReLU(),+                nn.Linear(HIDDEN1, HIDDEN2), nn.ReLU(),+            )+            self.fc_mu = nn.Linear(HIDDEN2, latent_dim)+            self.fc_logvar = nn.Linear(HIDDEN2, latent_dim)+            self.dec = nn.Sequential(+                nn.Linear(latent_dim, HIDDEN2), nn.ReLU(),+                nn.Linear(HIDDEN2, HIDDEN1), nn.ReLU(),+                nn.Linear(HIDDEN1, n_genes),+            )++        def encode(self, x):+            h = self.enc(x)+            return self.fc_mu(h), self.fc_logvar(h)++        def reparameterize(self, mu, logvar):+            std = torch.exp(0.5 * logvar)+            eps = torch.randn_like(std)+            return mu + eps * std++        def decode(self, z):+            return self.dec(z)++        def forward(self, x):+            mu, logvar = self.encode(x)+            z = self.reparameterize(mu, logvar)+            return self.decode(z), mu, logvar++    model = VAE()+    optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=LR)++    model.train()+    for epoch in range(N_EPOCHS):+        total_loss = 0.0+        for (batch,) in loader:+            optimizer.zero_grad()+            recon, mu, logvar = model(batch)+            recon_loss = nn.functional.mse_loss(recon, batch, reduction="sum") / batch.shape[0]+            kl_loss = -0.5 * torch.sum(1 + logvar - mu.pow(2) - logvar.exp()) / batch.shape[0]+            loss = recon_loss + 0.01 * kl_loss+            loss.backward()+            optimizer.step()+            total_loss += loss.item()+        if epoch == 0 or epoch == N_EPOCHS - 1:+            print(f"vae epoch {epoch}: loss={total_loss / len(loader.dataset):.4f}", file=sys.stderr)++    model.eval()+    return model+++def encode_all(model, X: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:+    import torch+    with torch.no_grad():+        t = torch.from_numpy(X)+        mu, _ = model.encode(t)+    return mu.numpy()+++def decode_all(model, Z: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:+    import torch+    with torch.no_grad():+        t = torch.from_numpy(Z.astype(np.float32))+        out = model.decode(t)+    return out.numpy()+++def main() -> None:+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()+    parser.add_argument("--data", required=True)+    parser.add_argument("--out", required=True)+    parser.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=0)+    args = parser.parse_args()++    manifest = load_manifest(args.data)+    genes = panel_genes(args.data, manifest)+    prev, last, mask, dt_in, last_e = stage_pair(args.data, manifest, genes)+    dt_out = float(manifest["target"]["time"] - last_e["time"])+    rng = np.random.default_rng(args.seed)+    n = target_n_cells(manifest, last.n_obs)++    if prev is None:+        (g_last,) = growth_rates([last], genes, mask, args.seed)+        rows = weighted_rows(g_last ** dt_out, n, rng)+        write_prediction(last.X[rows], genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+        return++    import torch+    from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors++    torch.set_num_threads(N_THREADS)++    hvg = select_hvg(sparse.vstack([prev.X, last.X]).tocsr(), mask, N_HVG)+    n_hvg_actual = len(hvg)++    Xp_hvg = prev.X[:, hvg].toarray().astype(np.float32)+    Xl_hvg = last.X[:, hvg].toarray().astype(np.float32)++    mu_all = (Xp_hvg.mean(axis=0) + Xl_hvg.mean(axis=0)) / 2.0+    std_all = np.sqrt((Xp_hvg.var(axis=0) + Xl_hvg.var(axis=0)) / 2.0 + 1e-8)+    Xp_norm = (Xp_hvg - mu_all) / std_all+    Xl_norm = (Xl_hvg - mu_all) / std_all+    X_train = np.vstack([Xp_norm, Xl_norm])++    model = train_vae(X_train, LATENT_DIM, args.seed)++    Zp = encode_all(model, Xp_norm)+    Zl = encode_all(model, Xl_norm)++    (g_prev, g_last) = growth_rates([prev, last], genes, mask, args.seed)+    rows = weighted_rows(g_last ** dt_out, n, rng)++    if ZERO_TRANSITION:+        Z_target = Zl[rows]+    else:+        nn_model = NearestNeighbors(n_neighbors=K_NEIGHBORS).fit(Zp)+        _, idx = nn_model.kneighbors(Zl[rows], return_distance=True)+        anc_mean = Zp[idx].mean(axis=1)+        displacement = Zl[rows] - anc_mean+        Z_target = Zl[rows] + displacement * (LAMBDA * dt_out / dt_in)++    decoded_hvg = decode_all(model, Z_target)+    decoded_hvg = decoded_hvg * std_all + mu_all+    np.maximum(decoded_hvg, 0.0, out=decoded_hvg)++    X_out = last.X[rows].toarray()+    X_out_hvg = X_out[:, hvg].copy()+    step = (decoded_hvg - X_out_hvg) * BLEND_DECODED+    step *= X_out_hvg > 0+    X_out[:, hvg] = X_out_hvg + step+    np.maximum(X_out, 0.0, out=X_out)++    write_prediction(X_out, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)+++if __name__ == "__main__":+    main()

调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。

没有记录调研来源。

分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。

改了什么把父节点 ot_moscot 的 OT 耦合整体换成 generative_latent:在 top-2000 HVG 上训练小型高斯 VAE(256-128-15维latent-128-256),latent 空间用 k=20 近邻估计每细胞位移并以 lambda=0.5*(dt_out/dt_in) 外推,解码后仅以 step=(decoded-original)*0.25 加在非零位点(addnz),非 HVG 保持原值;单阶段退化为生长加权复制,另有 ZERO_TRANSITION=1 关闭位移的对照开关。第 2 轮相对第 1 轮把混合系数从 0.7 降到 0.25、LAMBDA 1.0->0.5、latent 20->15、epochs 8->25、KL 权重 0.1->0.01。
各组分数的变化cell_state:变好:54.28 vs 50.07,+4.21,高于噪声
covariation:轻微变好但接近噪声:54.81 vs 52.52,+2.29
de_recovery:变坏:45.16 vs 51.38,-6.22,远超 T1 约 2 分噪声
direction:噪声内:50.22 vs 49.14,+1.08(<2 分噪声)
overall:榜分 51.09 vs 50.65,+0.44,在 T1 约 2 分噪声内,整体不能算有效;耗时 20.2s vs 10.5s(翻倍,仍很快),峰值内存 1.43GB vs 1.68GB(略降)
family_idgenerative_latent
假设是否成立unclear
经验
  1. VAE 解码-重混合类方法在本任务上呈现明确的分组权衡:混合/外推越保守,cell_state 与 covariation 越好(本节点 +4.21/+2.29),但 de_recovery 越差(-6.22),因为 addnz + 0.25 步长压低了差异表达幅度;榜分净效应被两边抵消(+0.44,噪声内)。
  2. 只改非零位点(addnz)且非 HVG 基因原样拷贝,会让新出现的 DE 基因几乎无法被预测,这是 de_recovery 掉 6.22 的直接结构性原因,而非训练不足。
  3. 第 1 轮 0.7 decoded / 0.3 original 的激进混合把 cell_state 打到 33.61;改成 original + 0.25*(decoded-original) 后回到 54.28,说明解码器输出必须先与原始表达做小步长保守混合,混合系数 >=0.5 会破坏细胞身份。
  4. KL 权重 0.1 -> 0.01、epochs 8 -> 25 与混合系数改动同时发生,无法从单次实验分离各自贡献;一次只动一个保守性旋钮才能归因。
  5. CPU 上 2000 HVG + 25 epoch 的小型 VAE 只要约 20s、1.43GB,成本不是瓶颈,可以负担更长的训练或多次对照运行。
  6. 代码里放了 ZERO_TRANSITION=1 的关闭对照,但本次只跑了默认(机制开启)路径,没有 off 输出可比,因此无法证明分数变化来自 latent 位移而不是编码-解码本身。
mechanism_activeunclear
下一步建议
  1. 机制归因(针对全组,尤其 direction/de_recovery):同一节点跑 ZERO_TRANSITION=0 与 =1 两次并分别打分,若两组分数差 <2 分则位移机制无效,应放弃 latent 外推、改回父节点 ot_moscot 的耦合位移。
  2. 针对 de_recovery(-6.22):放开 addnz 限制,允许在原始为零但 HVG 解码值高的位点写入表达(例如仅在 mask 内、且 decoded 值处于该基因 top 分位时写入),或把 HVG 数从 2000 提到全部 mask 内基因,看 DE 恢复能否回到 51 而不掉 cell_state。
  3. 针对 cell_state/covariation(已 +4.21/+2.29):在 BLEND_DECODED 上做 0.15 / 0.25 / 0.35 的小扫描,并把 LAMBDA 固定在 0.5,单变量确认最优点;若 0.25 附近是峰,则该分支上限已接近,收益有限。
  4. 针对 direction(+1.08,噪声内):把外推改成按 dt_out/dt_in 严格标定并对 displacement 做幅度截断(如 clip 到 latent 每维 1 个标准差),避免长间隔外推发散,再看 direction 是否能稳定超过 2 分噪声。

对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。

只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。

分析员

角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。5
工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。共 4 次:bash 3、write 1
用时不到 1 分
token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。输入 13,277 · 输出 1,460 · 思考 471
任务(第一行)分析节点 n15 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json
最后的回答(摘录)
ANALYSIS.json written
原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/analyst.jsonl 13 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/analyst.stderr

native

角色native alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数3 次
轮数0
工具调用共 0 次:—
用时3 分
token 数输入 71,816 · 输出 6,732 · 思考 3,165
任务(第一行)—
最后的回答(摘录)—
原始记录位置—

审查员

角色审查员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max
调用次数1 次
轮数6
工具调用共 13 次:read 9、bash 2、glob 1、write 1
用时1 分
token 数输入 18,388 · 输出 1,441 · 思考 1,429
任务(第一行)审查节点 n15 的程序是否越界读取、写死目标、钻评分器漏洞
最后的回答(摘录)
REVIEW.json written
原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/reviewer.jsonl 83 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/reviewer.stderr

stream

角色stream
调用次数0 次
轮数3
工具调用共 0 次:—
用时3 分
token 数输入 71,816 · 输出 6,732 · 思考 3,165
任务(第一行)—
最后的回答(摘录)
The scores show cell_state (33.61) is catastrophically low - the VAE decoder is destroying cell identity. The blend is too aggressive (0.7 decoded) and training is insufficient. I'll make the blending much more conservative, reduce extrapolation, and improve VAE training.

<<<<<<< SEARCH
N_HVG = 2000
LATENT_DIM = 20
HIDDEN1 = 256
HIDDEN2 = 128
N_EPOCHS = 8
BATCH_SIZE = 512
LR = 1e-3
K_NEIGHBORS = 20
LAMBDA = 1.0
ZERO_TRANSITION = int(os.environ.get("ZERO_TRANSITION", "0"))
N_THREADS = 8
=======
N_HVG = 2000
LATENT_DIM = 15
HIDDEN1 = 256
HIDDEN2 = 128
N_EPOCHS = 25
BATCH_SIZE = 512
LR = 1e-3
K_NEIGHBORS = 20
LAMBDA = 0.5
BLEND_DECODED = 0.25
ZERO_TRANSITION = int(os.environ.get("ZERO_TRANSITION", "0"))
N_THREADS = 8
>>>>>>> REPLACE

<<<<<<< SEARCH
            recon_loss = nn.functional.mse_loss(recon, batch, reduction="sum") / batch.shape[0]
            kl_loss = -0.5 * torch.sum(1 + logvar - mu.pow(2) - logvar.exp()) / batch.shape[0]
            loss = recon_loss + 0.1 * kl_loss
=======
            recon_loss = nn.functional.mse_loss(recon, batch, reduction="sum") / batch.shape[0]
            kl_loss = -0.5 * torch.sum(1 + logvar - mu.pow(2) - logvar.exp()) / batch.shape[0]
            loss = recon_loss + 0.01 * kl_loss
>>>>>>> REPLACE

<<<<<<< SEARCH

(只摘前 40 行)

原始记录位置/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/native/0/stream.jsonl 17 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/native/1/stream.jsonl 3 KB
/home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-202908-search-t1-scr-C/nodes/15/native/2/stream.jsonl 4 KB