总览 · ← 返回运行 20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native
节点 n21
改了什么
| 运行?一次完整的自动搜索或 Agent 会话,有自己的锁定配置和证据包。 | 20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native |
|---|---|
| 父节点 | n13 |
| 子节点 | n24 |
| 操作?种子:人写的起点;改进:在父节点上改;草稿:从头写;修复:修父节点的报错。 | 改进 |
| 状态 | 已打分 |
| 分数 | 搜索目标分 51.40(+0.6) · proxy 53.57(+0.1) · proxy2 53.57(+0.1) · X3 47.06(+1.7) |
| 审查 | 未审查 |
| 用时?从运行开始到结束(或到现在)的挂钟时间。 | 6 分 |
| 程序版本 | ba15b1d7c07eefd550c2c4dd199783098d34078b (programs.git) |
方法说明?节点程序自带的 METHOD.md:这个程序做了什么、为什么。
来自 programs.git ba15b1d7c0:solution/METHOD.md
改了什么
移除父节点新增的按类型均值平移(beta=0.1)及其伴随的稠密化操作。父节点 ANALYSIS 明确证明该操作使 covariation 从 51.96 降至 45.62(-6.34),且未改善 de_recovery(49.41→49.06)。回退后恢复纯加权抽样输出,预期 covariation 回到 ~51.96,整体榜分恢复到 ~51.4–51.75 水平。同时消除稠密化带来的内存(2.78GB→~1.26GB)和时间(4.0s→~1.5s)开销。
用到的知识与出处
父节点 13 ANALYSIS next_suggestions 第 1 条(回退按类型平移,恢复 covariation);父节点 13 effect_by_group 数据(covariation -6.34 远超噪声)。
调研员的计划
| 名称 | native r0: Change 1: Replace: rows = rng.choice(last.n_obs, size=n_target, replace=True, p=weights) X = last.X[rows] |
|---|---|
| 动机 | OpenEvolve native generation (route C), parent 13, round 0 of 3, half-A score 51.4704 |
| 做法 | ## 改了什么 移除父节点新增的按类型均值平移(beta=0.1)及其伴随的稠密化操作。父节点 ANALYSIS 明确证明该操作使 covariation 从 51.96 降至 45.62(-6.34),且未改善 de_recovery(49.41→49.06)。回退后恢复纯加权抽样输出,预期 covariation 回到 ~51.96,整体榜分恢复到 ~51.4–51.75 水平。同时消除稠密化带来的内存(2.78GB→~1.26GB)和时间(4.0s→~1.5s)开销。 ## 用到的知识与出处 父节点 13 ANALYSIS next_suggestions 第 1 条(回退按类型平移,恢复 covariation);父节点 13 effect_by_group 数据(covariation -6.34 远超噪声)。 |
代码改动?这个节点的程序和父节点程序的逐行差别:绿色是新增,红色是删除。
对比:父节点版本 072ba208ee。改动的文件:solution/METHOD.md +2 −2、solution/run.py +0 −16
diff --git a/solution/METHOD.md b/solution/METHOD.mdindex 62765a2..5913d24 100644--- a/solution/METHOD.md+++ b/solution/METHOD.md@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ ## 改了什么-回退第 0 轮的噪声和权重改动(噪声严重破坏 covariation:51.96→34.41),恢复父节点权重(heart 1.6、reduced 0.15、gut 0.9)。在此基础上新增确定性按类型均值放大:对抽样后的每个细胞加 beta×(该类型均值−全局均值),beta=0.1。此操作是确定性的、按类型统一方向的平移,不引入随机噪声,因此保留类型内协方差结构;同时放大类型间差异基因信号,针对 de_recovery(父节点最弱分组 49.41)。+移除父节点新增的按类型均值平移(beta=0.1)及其伴随的稠密化操作。父节点 ANALYSIS 明确证明该操作使 covariation 从 51.96 降至 45.62(-6.34),且未改善 de_recovery(49.41→49.06)。回退后恢复纯加权抽样输出,预期 covariation 回到 ~51.96,整体榜分恢复到 ~51.4–51.75 水平。同时消除稠密化带来的内存(2.78GB→~1.26GB)和时间(4.0s→~1.5s)开销。 ## 用到的知识与出处-父节点 ANALYSIS next_suggestions 第 2 条(叠加保守扰动提升 de_recovery);方法卡 T1 平移幅度节(位移应收缩,beta=0.1 是保守收缩);第 0 轮实验证明随机噪声破坏 covariation,确定性按类型平移是更安全的替代。+父节点 13 ANALYSIS next_suggestions 第 1 条(回退按类型平移,恢复 covariation);父节点 13 effect_by_group 数据(covariation -6.34 远超噪声)。diff --git a/solution/run.py b/solution/run.pyindex 731157f..4710196 100644--- a/solution/run.py+++ b/solution/run.py@@ -77,22 +77,6 @@ def main() -> None: rows = rng.choice(last.n_obs, size=n_target, replace=True, p=weights) X = last.X[rows]-- if hasattr(X, "toarray"):- X = X.toarray()- X = np.asarray(X, dtype=np.float32)-- labels_arr = np.asarray(labels)- sampled_labels = labels_arr[rows]- global_mean = X.mean(axis=0)- beta = 0.1- for t in np.unique(sampled_labels):- mask = sampled_labels == t- if mask.sum() > 1:- type_mean = X[mask].mean(axis=0)- X[mask] += beta * (type_mean - global_mean)- X = np.clip(X, 0.0, None)- write_prediction(X, genes, args.out, seed=args.seed)
调研来源?调研员查到并用到的知识条目和文献检索结果(只列标题和编号)。
没有记录调研来源。
分析结果?分析员写的 ANALYSIS.json:改了什么、各组分数怎么变、假设是否成立、经验和下一步建议。
| 改了什么 | 回退父节点 13 新增的按类型均值平移(beta=0.1)及配套稠密化/clip 操作,恢复纯加权抽样后直接写出 X[rows](保持稀疏)。 |
|---|---|
| 各组分数的变化 | X3:噪声内偏正:47.06 vs 45.36(+1.70,略低于 2 分噪声) cell_state:略变坏:51.23 vs 53.28(-2.05,刚超过 2 分噪声线) covariation:明显变好:51.96 vs 45.62(+6.34,远超噪声,完全恢复到平移前水平) de_recovery:噪声内:49.41 vs 49.06(+0.35) direction:噪声内:53.15 vs 53.68(-0.53) proxy:噪声内:53.57 vs 53.50(+0.07) proxy2:噪声内:53.57 vs 53.50(+0.07) |
| 假设是否成立 | 是 |
| 经验 |
|
| 下一步建议 |
|
对话摘要?每个角色和大模型对话的统计:轮数、工具调用、用时、token 数和最后的回答摘录;原始记录只给路径。
只给统计和最后回答的摘录;完整对话请到原始记录位置里列出的文件看。
分析员
| 角色?调研员写计划、工程师改代码、分析员解读分数、审查员检查作弊。 | 分析员 alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 1 次 |
| 轮数?大模型一共回复了几轮(每轮可以调用多个工具)。 | 3 |
| 工具调用?大模型调用读文件、执行命令等工具的次数,按工具名统计。 | 共 2 次:bash 1、write 1 |
| 用时 | 不到 1 分 |
| token 数?输入 / 输出(含思考)的 token 数,来自接口返回的用量。 | 输入 5,573 · 输出 878 · 思考 495 |
| 任务(第一行) | 分析节点 n21 的打分结果,写 ANALYSIS.json |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | ANALYSIS.json written |
| 原始记录位置?完整对话记录在 Spark 上的文件路径;看板不复制原始内容。 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native/nodes/21/analyst.jsonl 6 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native/nodes/21/analyst.stderr |
native
| 角色 | native alibaba-token-plan-cn/qwen3.8-max |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 3 次 |
| 轮数 | 0 |
| 工具调用 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | 4 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 64,656 · 输出 2,820 · 思考 9,121 |
| 任务(第一行) | — |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | — |
| 原始记录位置 | — |
stream
| 角色 | stream |
|---|---|
| 调用次数 | 0 次 |
| 轮数 | 3 |
| 工具调用 | 共 0 次:— |
| 用时 | 4 分 |
| token 数 | 输入 64,656 · 输出 2,820 · 思考 9,121 |
| 任务(第一行) | — |
| 最后的回答(摘录) | Looking at the results across all rounds:
- **Round 0 (pure weighted sampling, replace=True)**: score 51.47, covariation 51.37, de_recovery 49.35, X3 47.31, proxy 53.55
- **Round 1 (stratified without replacement)**: score 51.13, covariation 50.99, de_recovery 48.89, X3 47.41, proxy 52.99
- **Attempt 1 (original best, weighted replace=True, weights 1.6/0.15/0.9)**: score 51.75, covariation 51.96, de_recovery 49.41, X3 47.06, proxy 53.57
The stratified approach hurt proxy/proxy2 (52.99 vs 53.55) and covariation (50.99 vs 51.37). The original weighted sampling with replacement was better. But the best ever was Attempt 1 with the same weights. The difference between Round 0 (51.47) and Attempt 1 (51.75) is within noise (~2 points).
Key insight: the weighted sampling with replacement (original approach) consistently outperforms stratified sampling on proxy/proxy2 and covariation. Let me revert to weighted sampling with replacement, but try slightly stronger heart upweighting (1.7) and slightly lower reduced (0.12) to push cell_state and direction higher while keeping covariation intact. The original weights 1.6/0.15/0.9 scored best overall. Let me keep those exact weights and use replace=True, which is the proven best configuration.
The only difference between Round 0 and Attempt 1 is random seed behavior - they should be identical. The 0.28 difference is noise. So I should just revert to the simple weighted sampling approach.
To add value beyond pure reversion, I'll add a subtle improvement: sample with replacement but use a **temperature-scaled** weight distribution that's slightly sharper, which should improve cell_state separation without touching expression values. Specifically, raise weights to a power slightly > 1 to sharpen composition differences.
Actually, let me be more careful. The data shows:
- Weights 1.6/0.15/0.9 → 51.75 (attempt 1), 51.47 (round 0) - noise range
- Weights 1.8/0.08/0.85 → 51.41 (attempt 2) - slightly worse
- Stratified → 51.13 - worse
The safest move is to revert to weighted sampling with replace=True at the original weights. To differentiate and potentially improve, I'll try a small tweak: use weights 1.65/0.13/0.92 (very slightly sharper than 1.6/0.15/0.9) which should marginally improve cell_state/direction without harming covariation much.
Actually, given noise is ~2 points, any small weight change is meaningless. Let me instead try something structurally different that could actually help: **keep weighted sampling with replacement** (proven best for covariation) but add **stratified sampling within each type** to ensure diversity within types is preserved even with replacement at the global level. This is a hybrid: sample the number of cells per type using weights (with replacement across types), then within each type sample without replacement.
Wait - that's essentially what Round 1 did and it was worse. The issue is that without-replacement within types reduces diversity when n_take is close to len(idx).
Let me just revert to the proven best: weighted sampling with replacement, original weights.
```diff
<<<<<<< SEARCH
labels_arr = np.asarray(labels)
unique_types = np.unique(labels_arr)
type_info = []
for t in unique_types:
idx = np.where(labels_arr == t)[0]
w = family_weight(str(t))
type_info.append((idx, w))
total_weighted = sum(len(idx) * w for idx, w in type_info)
if total_weighted == 0:(只摘前 40 行) |
| 原始记录位置 | /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native/nodes/21/native/0/stream.jsonl 3 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native/nodes/21/native/1/stream.jsonl 4 KB /home/spark-longxinyang/vec/runs/formal/20261002-034201-search-t1-abc-r1-C-native/nodes/21/native/2/stream.jsonl 6 KB |